Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

Bull and Crow: Crow says Farmer Lies to Bull - Workflow + (The Crow is trying to convince the Bull th … The Crow is trying to convince the Bull that the Farmer does not tell the whole truth of his situation to the Bull. He provides a series of arguments that the Bull needs to believe to run away from the farmer before the farmer slaughters him. These truthful arguments are the evidence...and we all know the crow is telling the truth.we all know the crow is telling the truth.)
Bull and Crow: Bull says Crow Lies - Workflow + (The Crow tries to tell Bull why he is factually lying to himself. Bull thinks Crow is lying but in fact Bull is factually lying to himself. The evidence is self-evident by anyone with any experience with raising Cattle.)
Apple doesn't want to be forced to use usb-c - Workflow + (The EU has forced apple to use USB type c on their next devices. This will allow people to use one cable to charge all their new devices, but apple isn't happy with this. Greg Joswiak said this mandatory standard hinders innovation.)
Bull and Crow : Farmer says Crow Lies - Workflow + (The Farmer says it is OK to not reveal everything and to keep the cows happy while he is raising them by what he does and does not do.)
Trump Declassified Everything - Workflow + (The Justice Department said in a court fil … The Justice Department said in a court filing this week that the search of Mar-a-Lago resulted in the seizure of more than 100 unique documents with classification markings. But in posts on his social media platform, Trump has argued that he had declassified all of the documents in his possession."Number one, it was all declassified," he wrote in a post on August 12. "Lucky I Declassified!" he wrote in a post this Wednesday.Trump's comments about this supposed declassification have been very vague. But conservative writer John Solomon, one of the people Trump named as a representative in his dealings with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), was more specific in a Fox appearance on August 12. Solomon read a statement, which he said was from Trump's office, claiming that Trump "had a standing order...that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."This is patently false. Trump and his team have not provided any proof that Trump actually conducted some sort of broad declassification of the documents that ended up at Mar-a-Lago. What's more, eighteen former top Trump administration officials, including two former White House chiefs of staff who spoke on the record, told CNN in August that they never heard of a standing Trump declassification order when they were serving in the administration and that they now believe the claim is false. The former officials used words like "ludicrous," "ridiculous" and "bullsh*t.""Total nonsense," said one person who served as a senior White House official. "If that's true, where is the order with his signature on it? If that were the case, there would have been tremendous pushback from the Intel Community and DoD, which would almost certainly have become known to Intel and Armed Services Committees on the Hill."nd Armed Services Committees on the Hill.")
Ronald de Boer as aambassader of Qatar lies about working conditions - Workflow + (The bad working conditions and high heat h … The bad working conditions and high heat have caused a lot of working migrants to die a by Qatar so called "natural death". UN studies have found that the high temperatures and pour working conditions have a significant impact on the high death rate under migrant workers. As a tv personal Ronald de Boer supports Qatar and says that the numbers in the news and in particular 6500 workers that died is taken out of context. And supports Qatar in their work around the World Cup preparations.I believe it is a bad lie to support a dictatorship like Qatar in the harm they do to hard working immigrants. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/23/revealed-migrant-worker-deaths-qatar-fifa-world-cup-2022https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/08/qatar-failure-to-investigate-migrant-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/)
Sleep-Lies-Walker - Workflow + (The book How We Sleep by Matthew Walker i … The book How We Sleep by Matthew Walker is filled with lies that imply causation for whatis only established correlation. As such a lossof sleep is blamed on many things which can causea loss of sleep. As if the loss of sleep is always under your control. Walker seems to believe that you can justgo to sleep whenever you are told to do it.The intro shows the fallacy in his reasoning.Ultimately, asking “Why do we sleep?” was the wrong question. It implied there was a single function, one holy grail of a reason that we slept, and we went in search of it. Theories ranged from the logical (a time for conserving energy), to the peculiar (an opportunity for eyeball oxygenation), to the psychoanalytic (a non-conscious state in which we fulfill repressed wishes). This book will reveal a very different truth: sleep is infinitely more complex, profoundly more interesting, and strikingly health-relevant. We sleep for a rich litany of functions, plural—an abundant constellation of nighttime benefits that service both our brains and our bodies. There does not seem to be one major organ within the body, or process within the brain, that isn’t optimally enhanced by sleep (and detrimentally impaired when we don’t get enough). That we receive such a bounty of health benefits each night should notWalker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (p. 6). Scribner. Kindle Edition. be surprising. After all, we are awake for two-thirds of our lives, and we don’t just achieve one useful thing during that stretch of time. We accomplish myriad undertakings that promote our own well-being and survival. Why, then, would we expect sleep—and the twenty-five to thirty years, on average, it takes from our lives—to offer one function only? Through an explosion of discoveries over the past twenty years, we have come to realize that evolution did not make a spectacular blunder in conceiving of sleep. Sleep dispenses a multitude of health-ensuring benefits, yours to pick up in repeat prescription every twenty-four hours, should you choose. Within the brain, sleep enriches a diversity of functions, including our ability to learn, memorize, and make logical decisions and choices. Benevolently servicing our psychological health, sleep recalibrates our emotional brain circuits, allowing us to navigate next-day social and psychologicalWalker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (pp. 6-7). Scribner. Kindle Edition. Other questions that can draw out signs of insufficient sleep are: If you didn’t set an alarm clock, would you sleep past that time? (If so, you need more sleep than you are giving yourself.) Do you find yourself at your computer screen reading and then rereading (and perhaps rereading again) the same sentence? (This is often a sign of a fatigued, under-slept brain.) Do you sometimes forget what color the last few traffic lights were while driving? (Simple distraction is often the cause, but a lack of sleep is another culprit.)Correlation is Not Causation Lieulprit.) Correlation is Not Causation Lie)
Flowers - Workflow + (The camelia would bloom in the spring, but it not spring and he is blooming)
Bird Names for Birds - Workflow + (The concern about eponymous and honorific … The concern about eponymous and honorific common bird names is not new. But the movement to see these names changed is.Eponyms (a person after whom a discovery, invention, place, etc., is named or thought to be named) and honorific common bird names (a name given to something in honor of a person) are problematic because they perpetuate colonialism and the racism associated with it. The names that these birds currently have—for example, Bachman’s Sparrow—represent and remember people (mainly white men) who often have objectively horrible pasts and do not uphold the morals and standards the bird community should memorialize.The vast majority of eponymous common names were applied to birds by European and American naturalists during a period of time known as colonialism, when (primarily) European countries subjugated, exploited, and populated territories held by non-white peoples. To legitimize this endeavor, the concept of race as a classification system was developed, and the white “race” and civilization were considered superior to all others. The impacts of colonialism were global, and the false concept of race used to justify colonialism resulted in the reality of racism, a reality which has structured societies, interactions, and even survival ever since.Eponymous common names are essentially verbal statues. They were made to honor the benefactor in perpetuity, and as such reflect the accomplishments and values that the creator esteemed. We are not bound by either the intention or the regard; we should make decisions about who and what we honor based on our own values, values that create a more equitable world for all. By continuing to use eponymous common bird names, we continue to reference and honor our distressful colonial heritage and the racism that was a direct consequence of this malicious exploitation. This is unacceptable, and we must do better.Current events in 2020 renewed societal emphasis on social justice and have shown that the time to reevaluate is now, and are largely why this initiative formalized. We are overdue individually, as groups and communities, and as a society to reevaluate our biases, remove barriers of all kinds, and be better. Bird Names For Birds—both the initiative and the actual bird names—will not end racism. It won’t even end all of the EDI problems within the bird community. However, it is one step. It is one problem that the bird community can be self-aware of, acknowledge, and rectify. A growing movement to reexamine names bestowed on everything from college campuses to city streets has swelled to encompass birders, ornithologists, and conservationists. Doing away with honorifics, they say, and renaming birds for the qualities that make each special, could make the birding world more inclusive for those who have long been left out or pushed away. Once unthinkable, the scientific body that governs bird names is finally embarking on a process that could redefine not only what we call myriad birds but also birding itself. About 150 of the roughly 2,000 North and Central American bird species have honorifics. Most were named for naturalists, such as Alexander Wilson, a chronicler of birdlife during the early 19th century and widely considered the father of American ornithology. The handful of names that commemorate women mostly use first names; Anna’s Hummingbird is a tribute to French courtier Anna Masséna, wife of an amateur ornithologist. While these figures don’t stir up much controversy, other species are saddled with heavier burdens.Audubon’s Shearwater and Audubon’s Oriole honor renowned avian artist John James Audubon (also the namesake of this magazine), an enslaver who collected skulls from Texas battlefields during his travels. His contemporary John Kirk Townsend plundered Native American graves; his legacy lives on with Townsend’s Warbler and Townsend’s Solitaire. Scott’s Oriole carries a banner for General Winfield Scott, who willingly accepted a leading role in the genocide of Native Americans on the Trail of Tears.of Native Americans on the Trail of Tears.)
ballot stuffing lie - Workflow + (The court filing contradicts the actual vo … The court filing contradicts the actual vote that took place. It was said that there was "egregious ballot stuffing" Yet, the canidate for which it was against, actually in all the counties the court action was about.The judge threw this case out (judges threw out all the cases filed by the Trump group). More credence this is a factual lie.up). More credence this is a factual lie.)

A lie - Workflow + (The evidence)

Ornstein Filibuster Lie 2 - Workflow + (The framers feared 'the tyranny of the maj … The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'Filibuster proponents often argue that the Constitution’s framers intended to obstruct decisions by simple majorities. In defense of the filibuster, Lewis & Clark Law School professor James Huffman wrote in the Hill that James Madison “would likely think it a brilliant innovation for preventing majority tyranny.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) wrote in the New York Times in 2019 that the filibuster is “central to the order the Constitution sets forth,” citing Madison’s view that the Senate ought to function as an “additional impediment” and a “complicated check” on the House.Ornstein says this is a lie. McConnell is lying.But other than the explicit constitutional requirements for supermajorities, such as to approve treaties, the framers were foursquare for majority votes. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 22 that allowing minorities to overrule the majority would cause “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible compromises of the public good.” Congressional Research Service scholar Walter J. Oleszek has noted: “Overall, the Framers generally favored decision-making by simple majority vote. This view is buttressed by the grant of a vote to the Vice President (Article I, section 3) in those cases where the Senators are ‘equally divided.’” This provision makes clear that the Constitution’s drafters expected that most decisions would be made by majority vote.most decisions would be made by majority vote.)
Ornstein Filibuster Lie 2 - Workflow + (The framers feared 'the tyranny of the maj … The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'Filibuster proponents often argue that the Constitution’s framers intended to obstruct decisions by simple majorities. In defense of the filibuster, Lewis & Clark Law School professor James Huffman wrote in the Hill that James Madison “would likely think it a brilliant innovation for preventing majority tyranny.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) wrote in the New York Times in 2019 that the filibuster is “central to the order the Constitution sets forth,” citing Madison’s view that the Senate ought to function as an “additional impediment” and a “complicated check” on the House.Ornstein says this is a lie. McConnell is lying.But other than the explicit constitutional requirements for supermajorities, such as to approve treaties, the framers were foursquare for majority votes. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 22 that allowing minorities to overrule the majority would cause “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible compromises of the public good.” Congressional Research Service scholar Walter J. Oleszek has noted: “Overall, the Framers generally favored decision-making by simple majority vote. This view is buttressed by the grant of a vote to the Vice President (Article I, section 3) in those cases where the Senators are ‘equally divided.’” This provision makes clear that the Constitution’s drafters expected that most decisions would be made by majority vote.most decisions would be made by majority vote.)
Testing a lie about the cold winter - Workflow + (The girl said it was cold. But i looked at the temperature and it was like 26 degrees celsius. SO it was not cold)
Hunter Bidens Laptop - Workflow + (The intelligence 'experts' who falsely dis … The intelligence 'experts' who falsely discredited Hunter Biden's laptop -- and still won't say sorry.https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/giuliani-and-the-new-york-post-are-pushing-russian-disinformation-its-a-big-test-for-the-media/ Mother JonesSusan Walsh/APFight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter. A newly discovered laptop, the FBI, a trove of emails, October, a presidential election—it sounds familiar. Especially when you add in a Russian disinformation campaign. On Wednesday, the New York Post released what it hailed as a bombshell: an unidentified computer repair store owner in Delaware had come to possess a laptop that contained Hunter Biden emails (and purportedly a sex tape), the hard drive and computer was seized by the FBI, the store owner at some point passed a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani, and one of the emails suggested that Hunter, who served on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma, may have in 2015 introduced a Burisma official to his dad, Vice President Joe Biden. The story depicts this as a big scandal, and Guiliani tweeted, “Much more to come.” But the key point of the article was predicated on false information that Giuliani has been spreading for a long time—and that appears to be linked to a Russian disinformation operation that the Post neglected to note in its article. That is, the Post piece, based on an unproven smear, is in sync with Moscow’s ongoing effort to influence the 2020 election to help President Donald Trump retain power. (The FBI and other parts of the US intelligence community have stated that Vladimir Putin is once again attacking the US political system to boost Trump.) And this story presents a challenge to the American media: how to report on an orchestrated campaign to affect the election that relies on disinformation, salacious and sensational material, and the revival of allegations that have already been debunked.legations that have already been debunked.)
Washington Post's slogan vs their paywall - Workflow + (The slogan of the Washington post is: Democracy Dies in Darkness. But they do put their news behind a paywall so it isn't accessible for everyone. Are they hypocritical or is it acceptabel?)
Smoketest 12/8 - Workflow + (The work that is done is not working Or does it?)
Economic Support and Inflation - Workflow + (There is a popular narrative making the ro … There is a popular narrative making the rounds that theUS government's stimulus aid to Americans during the height pandemic had big economic benefits — but it also fueled inflation. How do we know that government aid isn’t the reason the economy’s tanking now? Just by looking around the world, and observing. If it were the case that stimulus led to inflation, then of course countries with the greatest support would have the highest inflation. But that’s not true. Europe, which offered people way, way more support than America and the UK, has lower inflation rates. And plenty of countries which offered people no support — because they’re poor nations — have skyrocketing inflation rates. It’s not about stimulus.This isn’t demand-led inflation. When people subscribe to this naive pop myth that “printing money during the pandemic caused inflation,” what are they really saying? That the economy’s cratering right now because people have too much money. LOL. Do you know anyone who has too much money? That’s an absurd thing to say.This is supply side inflation: for example, tampons and baby formula at the moment.Why? One reason is Covid — it caused labour shortages across sectors from healthcare to transportation. But the bigger picture here is about climate change and resource depletion. And the failure of industrialized capitalism, which is extractive, Exploitative. Rent-seeking. It doesn’t nourish, create, care, give birth to, just manufactures lowest-common-denominator stuff and literally turn life into death: plastic, fossil fuels, forests ripped down, oceans polluted, skies full of carbon, rivers turned to poison. They take without giving,As the resources of the planet dwindle, in anticipation, warlords and oligarchs start conflicts to try and seize what of them they can.ts to try and seize what of them they can.)
VCorpInvents Robot Lie - Workflow + (These three different comments cannot just … These three different comments cannot just be three humans. It is a bot pretending to be a human being and isn't going to tell the whole truth.Responses to one of the most popular youtube sites for investing in crypto / NFTsLisa BaldwinLisa Baldwin2 months agoI greatly appreciate your honesty and how this worked out for you. I’m trying to learn this and integrate this strategy into my portfolio, just wanna do it right. This helps a lot. Learning what not to do is as valuable as learning what to do, this video provides both but later on I was convinced to try out packages of Vcorpinvest.Com which have yielded lot more profits.takeouttakeoutMariammMariamm2 months agoYour videos are amazing and very helpful. I am a 41 year old father of 5 that's busts my but everyday doing electrical. A few years ago I got into crypto and been trying to figure trading out on my own but ended up investing instead with VCORPINVEST.COM . Your videos are a big help! Glad I could figure it out and was able to get out of debt and be with my kids more oftenstayhomestayhomestayhomeRobertsRoberts2 months agoThis was my first steps into the Cryptocurrency world and for the first time when trading I have felt confident in my decisions. I have made 3 times on my trading capital under 3 months and with the market making large moves and the support and mentoring I get from VCORPINVEST.COM I am going for even bigger goals. Platinum Academy has provided me the support I needed to really make my trading better. I’m also thinking of taking their Forex course next year so I have more eggs in more baskets.stayhomestayhomestayhomestayhome baskets. stayhomestayhomestayhomestayhome)
The anti vax group lied about the context of the film - Workflow + (They told Naomi the interview was for a informative interview but it was for an anti vaccine group.)
Test Case 1 - Workflow + (This guy told a lie.)