Search by property

From cm2.liecourt.com

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Accusation" with value "The evidence". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 26 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

  • satire of Sen Johnson lie - Workflow  + (Ron Johnson lied about a pledge he had sigRon Johnson lied about a pledge he had signed, and a commenter on Twitter responded with a satirical lie. The question is whether the commenter was lying or telling the truth. I argue that the commenter was lying, but in this case the lie was a good satirical remark. A good lie.</br></br>BREAKING: Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson, one of former President Trump’s most vocal supporters, says he will seek reelection. Johnson had pledged not to run for a third time, but he, says circumstances have changed now that Democrats control the Senate.</br>https://twitter.com/AP/status/1480185599114027010?s=20</br></br>This is the satirical response. </br>Chris America</br>@Chris_America</br>·</br>22h</br>Replying to </br>@AP</br>He went back on his word? Shocking.</br>https://twitter.com/Chris_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20is_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20)
  • satire of Sen Johnson lie - Workflow  + (Ron Johnson lied about a pledge he had sigRon Johnson lied about a pledge he had signed, and a commenter on Twitter responded with a satirical lie. The question is whether the commenter was lying or telling the truth. I argue that the commenter was lying, but in this case the lie was a good satirical remark. A good lie.</br></br>BREAKING: Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson, one of former President Trump’s most vocal supporters, says he will seek reelection. Johnson had pledged not to run for a third time, but he, says circumstances have changed now that Democrats control the Senate.</br>https://twitter.com/AP/status/1480185599114027010?s=20</br></br>This is the satirical response. </br>Chris America</br>@Chris_America</br>·</br>22h</br>Replying to </br>@AP</br>He went back on his word? Shocking.</br>https://twitter.com/Chris_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20is_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20)
  • viral rumor lie - Workflow  + (Rumors are lies. This slide looks at princRumors are lies. This slide looks at principles for causing rumors </br>to go viral. One is a slogan. </br>#Disinformation 101 - helping you to understand and recognize cognitive attacks and attempts to manipulate you from an offensive perspective. The success of such attacks heavily depends on you NOT understanding and recognizing them.</br>Rumors #18</br></br>Rand Waltzman</br>@cogsec</br></br></br>The slogan type rumor (WWII rumor in England.. "England will fight to the last Frenchman") </br>is especially adapted to summarizing opinions or attitudes that are</br>already widely accepted. Slogan type rumors will gain acceptance </br>only when the ground has been prepared for them by narrative type </br>rumors or by other forms of propaganda.</br></br>Analysis of the motivation in this slogan rumor lie: We English </br>should not be fighting for the French. They aren't worth it.</br></br>note: #disinformation for finding ICoL suit materialinformation for finding ICoL suit material)
  • Cruz wants to abolish doors - Workflow  + (Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has continually Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has continually put forward a lie—that we don’t need gun control in the US. Now he is spreading a lie about that lie! He says the best way to avoid school shooting is to make schools more like prisons or military facilities, to “harden” them. The general idea, apparently, is that if a school has one point of entry, and that doorway is well guarded, a gunman might have greater difficulty killing people inside. Who needs gun control, the argument goes, when all we really need is door control.</br></br>There are a variety of reasons this is a difficult idea to take seriously.</br></br>First, I’m reasonably sure this would be a serious fire hazard in many school buildings nationwide.</br></br>Second, a lot of schools have windows.</br></br>Third, what about schools made up of several buildings, with students walking outdoors between them. Mandating “one door that goes in and out of the school” would be literally impossible.</br></br>Fourth, mass shootings don’t just happen in schools — and I’m not sure having one entry point to a grocery store is realistic.</br></br>Finally, there’s also reason to be skeptical of the underlying point. Juliette Kayyem, a veteran of the Obama administration’s Department of Homeland Security, and currently a lecturer in international security at Harvard, wrote on Twitter, “The ‘one door’ theory of schools is not how we think about education or design, but it’s also not how we think about security. It actually is bad safety planning. A ‘psychopath’ would then just target the kids backed up in line and waiting for this ‘one door’ to let them through.”</br></br>Or put another way, those looking at Cruz’s idea as a credible policy proposal are almost certainly making a mistake.</br></br>https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/latest-school-shooting-ted-cruz-focuses-doors-rcna30630</br></br>URL: https://www.salon.com/2022/05/26/ted-cruz-thinks-he-has-a-better-solution-to-uvalde-school-than-control-door-control/o-uvalde-school-than-control-door-control/)
  • Short phrase - Workflow  + (Short phrase)
  • Confirmation Bias - Workflow  + (Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn said ofTennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn said of nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson that “You have made clear that you believe judges must consider critical race theory when deciding how to sentence criminal defendants.”</br></br>Blackburn was referring to a 2015 speech in which Jackson described how she encouraged students to study federal sentencing policy as an academic area implicating many topics.</br></br>“Sentencing is just plain interesting on an intellectual level, in part because it melds together myriad types of law — criminal law, of course, but also administrative law, constitutional law, critical race theory, negotiations, and to some extent, even contracts,” Jackson said in her speech. “And if that’s not enough to prove to them that sentencing is a subject ... worth studying, I point out that sentencing policy implicates and intersects with various other intellectual disciplines as well, including philosophy, psychology, history, statistics, economics, and politics.”</br></br>In other words, she indicates that critical race theory might be one of many potential factors in play in sentencing, not a mandatory consideration.sentencing, not a mandatory consideration.)
  • Bas Couwenberg - Workflow  + (Test)
  • test22222 - Workflow  + (Test)
  • test - Workflow  + (Test)
  • Test - Workflow  + (Test)
  • Test - Workflow  + (Test)
  • Test - Workflow  + (Test)
  • testing - Workflow  + (Testing)
  • Testing in Safari - Workflow  + (Testing in Safari)
  • Bull and Crow: Crow says Farmer Lies to Bull - Workflow  + (The Crow is trying to convince the Bull that the Farmer does not tell the whole truth of his situation to the Bull. He provides a series of arguments that the Bull needs to believe to run away from the farmer before the farmer slaughters him.)
  • Bull and Crow: Crow says Farmer Lies to Bull - Workflow  + (The Crow is trying to convince the Bull thThe Crow is trying to convince the Bull that the Farmer does not tell the whole truth of his situation to the Bull. He provides a series of arguments that the Bull needs to believe to run away from the farmer before the farmer slaughters him. These truthful arguments are the evidence...and we all know the crow is telling the truth.we all know the crow is telling the truth.)
  • Bull and Crow: Bull says Crow Lies - Workflow  + (The Crow tries to tell Bull why he is factually lying to himself. Bull thinks Crow is lying but in fact Bull is factually lying to himself. The evidence is self-evident by anyone with any experience with raising Cattle.)
  • Apple doesn't want to be forced to use usb-c - Workflow  + (The EU has forced apple to use USB type c on their next devices. This will allow people to use one cable to charge all their new devices, but apple isn't happy with this. Greg Joswiak said this mandatory standard hinders innovation.)
  • Bull and Crow : Farmer says Crow Lies - Workflow  + (The Farmer says it is OK to not reveal everything and to keep the cows happy while he is raising them by what he does and does not do.)
  • Trump Declassified Everything - Workflow  + (The Justice Department said in a court filThe Justice Department said in a court filing this week that the search of Mar-a-Lago resulted in the seizure of more than 100 unique documents with classification markings. But in posts on his social media platform, Trump has argued that he had declassified all of the documents in his possession.</br></br>"Number one, it was all declassified," he wrote in a post on August 12. "Lucky I Declassified!" he wrote in a post this Wednesday.</br></br>Trump's comments about this supposed declassification have been very vague. But conservative writer John Solomon, one of the people Trump named as a representative in his dealings with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), was more specific in a Fox appearance on August 12. Solomon read a statement, which he said was from Trump's office, claiming that Trump "had a standing order...that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."</br>This is patently false. Trump and his team have not provided any proof that Trump actually conducted some sort of broad declassification of the documents that ended up at Mar-a-Lago. What's more, eighteen former top Trump administration officials, including two former White House chiefs of staff who spoke on the record, told CNN in August that they never heard of a standing Trump declassification order when they were serving in the administration and that they now believe the claim is false. The former officials used words like "ludicrous," "ridiculous" and "bullsh*t."</br></br>"Total nonsense," said one person who served as a senior White House official. "If that's true, where is the order with his signature on it? If that were the case, there would have been tremendous pushback from the Intel Community and DoD, which would almost certainly have become known to Intel and Armed Services Committees on the Hill."nd Armed Services Committees on the Hill.")
  • Ronald de Boer as aambassader of Qatar lies about working conditions - Workflow  + (The bad working conditions and high heat hThe bad working conditions and high heat have caused a lot of working migrants to die a by Qatar so called "natural death". UN studies have found that the high temperatures and pour working conditions have a significant impact on the high death rate under migrant workers. </br></br>As a tv personal Ronald de Boer supports Qatar and says that the numbers in the news and in particular 6500 workers that died is taken out of context. And supports Qatar in their work around the World Cup preparations.</br>I believe it is a bad lie to support a dictatorship like Qatar in the harm they do to hard working immigrants. </br></br>https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/23/revealed-migrant-worker-deaths-qatar-fifa-world-cup-2022</br></br>https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/08/qatar-failure-to-investigate-migrant-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/)
  • Sleep-Lies-Walker - Workflow  + (The book How We Sleep by Matthew Walker iThe book How We Sleep by Matthew Walker </br>is filled with lies that imply causation for what</br>is only established correlation. As such a loss</br>of sleep is blamed on many things which can cause</br>a loss of sleep. As if the loss of sleep is always under </br>your control. Walker seems to believe that you can just</br>go to sleep whenever you are told to do it.</br></br>The intro shows the fallacy in his reasoning.</br>Ultimately, asking “Why do we sleep?” was the wrong question. </br>It implied there was a single function, one holy grail of a reason that </br>we slept, and we went in search of it. Theories ranged from </br>the logical (a time for conserving energy), </br>to the peculiar (an opportunity for eyeball oxygenation), </br>to the psychoanalytic (a non-conscious state in which we fulfill repressed wishes). </br>This book will reveal a very different truth: sleep is </br>infinitely more complex, profoundly more interesting, </br>and strikingly health-relevant. We sleep for a rich litany of functions, </br>plural—an abundant constellation of nighttime benefits that service both our brains and our bodies. </br>There does not seem to be one major organ within the body, or process within the brain, </br>that isn’t optimally enhanced by sleep (and detrimentally impaired when we don’t get enough).</br> That we receive such a bounty of health benefits each night should not</br></br>Walker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (p. 6). Scribner. Kindle Edition. </br>be surprising. After all, we are awake for two-thirds of our lives, </br>and we don’t just achieve one useful thing during that stretch of time. </br>We accomplish myriad undertakings that promote our own well-being and survival. </br>Why, then, would we expect sleep—and the twenty-five to thirty years, </br>on average, it takes from our lives—to offer one function only? </br>Through an explosion of discoveries over the past twenty years,</br> we have come to realize that evolution did not make a spectacular </br>blunder in conceiving of sleep. Sleep dispenses a multitude of </br>health-ensuring benefits, yours to pick up in repeat prescription </br>every twenty-four hours, should you choose. Within the brain, </br>sleep enriches a diversity of functions, including our ability </br>to learn, memorize, and make logical decisions and choices. </br>Benevolently servicing our psychological health, sleep recalibrates </br>our emotional brain circuits, allowing us to navigate next-day social and psychological</br></br>Walker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (pp. 6-7). Scribner. Kindle Edition. </br>Other questions that can draw out signs of insufficient sleep are: </br>If you didn’t set an alarm clock, would you sleep past that time? </br>(If so, you need more sleep than you are giving yourself.) </br>Do you find yourself at your computer screen reading and then rereading </br>(and perhaps rereading again) the same sentence? </br>(This is often a sign of a fatigued, under-slept brain.) </br>Do you sometimes forget what color the last few traffic lights were while driving? </br>(Simple distraction is often the cause, but a lack of sleep is another culprit.)</br></br>Correlation is Not Causation Lieulprit.) Correlation is Not Causation Lie)
  • Flowers - Workflow  + (The camelia would bloom in the spring, but it not spring and he is blooming)
  • Bird Names for Birds - Workflow  + (The concern about eponymous and honorific The concern about eponymous and honorific common bird names is not new. But the movement to see these names changed is.</br></br>Eponyms (a person after whom a discovery, invention, place, etc., is named or thought to be named) and honorific common bird names (a name given to something in honor of a person) are problematic because they perpetuate colonialism and the racism associated with it. The names that these birds currently have—for example, Bachman’s Sparrow—represent and remember people (mainly white men) who often have objectively horrible pasts and do not uphold the morals and standards the bird community should memorialize.</br></br>The vast majority of eponymous common names were applied to birds by European and American naturalists during a period of time known as colonialism, when (primarily) European countries subjugated, exploited, and populated territories held by non-white peoples. To legitimize this endeavor, the concept of race as a classification system was developed, and the white “race” and civilization were considered superior to all others. The impacts of colonialism were global, and the false concept of race used to justify colonialism resulted in the reality of racism, a reality which has structured societies, interactions, and even survival ever since.</br></br>Eponymous common names are essentially verbal statues. They were made to honor the benefactor in perpetuity, and as such reflect the accomplishments and values that the creator esteemed. We are not bound by either the intention or the regard; we should make decisions about who and what we honor based on our own values, values that create a more equitable world for all. By continuing to use eponymous common bird names, we continue to reference and honor our distressful colonial heritage and the racism that was a direct consequence of this malicious exploitation. This is unacceptable, and we must do better.</br></br>Current events in 2020 renewed societal emphasis on social justice and have shown that the time to reevaluate is now, and are largely why this initiative formalized. We are overdue individually, as groups and communities, and as a society to reevaluate our biases, remove barriers of all kinds, and be better. </br></br>Bird Names For Birds—both the initiative and the actual bird names—will not end racism. It won’t even end all of the EDI problems within the bird community. However, it is one step. It is one problem that the bird community can be self-aware of, acknowledge, and rectify. </br>A growing movement to reexamine names bestowed on everything from college campuses to city streets has swelled to encompass birders, ornithologists, and conservationists. Doing away with honorifics, they say, and renaming birds for the qualities that make each special, could make the birding world more inclusive for those who have long been left out or pushed away. Once unthinkable, the scientific body that governs bird names is finally embarking on a process that could redefine not only what we call myriad birds but also birding itself. </br></br>About 150 of the roughly 2,000 North and Central American bird species have honorifics. Most were named for naturalists, such as Alexander Wilson, a chronicler of birdlife during the early 19th century and widely considered the father of American ornithology. The handful of names that commemorate women mostly use first names; Anna’s Hummingbird is a tribute to French courtier Anna Masséna, wife of an amateur ornithologist. While these figures don’t stir up much controversy, other species are saddled with heavier burdens.</br></br>Audubon’s Shearwater and Audubon’s Oriole honor renowned avian artist John James Audubon (also the namesake of this magazine), an enslaver who collected skulls from Texas battlefields during his travels. His contemporary John Kirk Townsend plundered Native American graves; his legacy lives on with Townsend’s Warbler and Townsend’s Solitaire. Scott’s Oriole carries a banner for General Winfield Scott, who willingly accepted a leading role in the genocide of Native Americans on the Trail of Tears.of Native Americans on the Trail of Tears.)
  • ballot stuffing lie - Workflow  + (The court filing contradicts the actual voThe court filing contradicts the actual vote that took place. It was said that there was "egregious ballot stuffing" Yet, the canidate for which it was against, actually in all the counties the court action was about.</br></br>The judge threw this case out (judges threw out all the cases filed by the Trump group). More credence this is a factual lie.up). More credence this is a factual lie.)
  • Ornstein Filibuster Lie 2 - Workflow  + (The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majThe framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'</br>Filibuster proponents often argue that the Constitution’s framers intended to </br>obstruct decisions by simple majorities. In defense of the filibuster, Lewis & Clark Law School professor </br>James Huffman wrote in the Hill that James Madison “would likely think it a brilliant innovation for </br>preventing majority tyranny.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) wrote in the New York </br>Times in 2019 that the filibuster is “central to the order the Constitution sets forth,” citing Madison’s view </br>that the Senate ought to function as an “additional impediment” and a “complicated check” on the House.</br></br>Ornstein says this is a lie. McConnell is lying.</br>But other than the explicit constitutional requirements for supermajorities, </br>such as to approve treaties, the framers were foursquare for majority votes. </br>Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 22 that allowing minorities to overrule </br>the majority would cause “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible </br>compromises of the public good.” Congressional Research Service scholar Walter J. Oleszek has noted:</br> “Overall, the Framers generally favored decision-making by simple majority vote. </br>This view is buttressed by the grant of a vote to the Vice President (Article I, section 3) in </br>those cases where the Senators are ‘equally divided.’” </br>This provision makes clear that the Constitution’s drafters expected</br> that most decisions would be made by majority vote.most decisions would be made by majority vote.)
  • Ornstein Filibuster Lie 2 - Workflow  + (The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majThe framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'</br>Filibuster proponents often argue that the Constitution’s framers intended to </br>obstruct decisions by simple majorities. In defense of the filibuster, Lewis & Clark Law School professor </br>James Huffman wrote in the Hill that James Madison “would likely think it a brilliant innovation for </br>preventing majority tyranny.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) wrote in the New York </br>Times in 2019 that the filibuster is “central to the order the Constitution sets forth,” citing Madison’s view </br>that the Senate ought to function as an “additional impediment” and a “complicated check” on the House.</br></br>Ornstein says this is a lie. McConnell is lying.</br>But other than the explicit constitutional requirements for supermajorities, </br>such as to approve treaties, the framers were foursquare for majority votes. </br>Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 22 that allowing minorities to overrule </br>the majority would cause “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible </br>compromises of the public good.” Congressional Research Service scholar Walter J. Oleszek has noted:</br> “Overall, the Framers generally favored decision-making by simple majority vote. </br>This view is buttressed by the grant of a vote to the Vice President (Article I, section 3) in </br>those cases where the Senators are ‘equally divided.’” </br>This provision makes clear that the Constitution’s drafters expected</br> that most decisions would be made by majority vote.most decisions would be made by majority vote.)
  • Testing a lie about the cold winter - Workflow  + (The girl said it was cold. But i looked at the temperature and it was like 26 degrees celsius. SO it was not cold)
  • Hunter Bidens Laptop - Workflow  + (The intelligence 'experts' who falsely disThe intelligence 'experts' who falsely discredited Hunter Biden's laptop -- and still won't say sorry.</br></br>https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/giuliani-and-the-new-york-post-are-pushing-russian-disinformation-its-a-big-test-for-the-media/ Mother Jones</br></br>Susan Walsh/AP</br></br>Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter. A newly discovered laptop, the FBI, a trove of emails, October, a presidential election—it sounds familiar. Especially when you add in a Russian disinformation campaign. On Wednesday, the New York Post released what it hailed as a bombshell: an unidentified computer repair store owner in Delaware had come to possess a laptop that contained Hunter Biden emails (and purportedly a sex tape), the hard drive and computer was seized by the FBI, the store owner at some point passed a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani, and one of the emails suggested that Hunter, who served on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma, may have in 2015 introduced a Burisma official to his dad, Vice President Joe Biden. The story depicts this as a big scandal, and Guiliani tweeted, “Much more to come.” </br></br>But the key point of the article was predicated on false information that Giuliani</br> has been spreading for a long time—and that appears to be linked to a Russian disinformation operation that the Post neglected to note in its article. That is, the Post piece, based on an unproven smear, is in sync with Moscow’s ongoing effort to influence the 2020 election to help President Donald Trump retain power. (The FBI and other parts of the US intelligence community have stated that Vladimir Putin is once again attacking the US political system to boost Trump.) </br>And this story presents a challenge to the American media: how to report on an orchestrated campaign to affect the election that relies on disinformation, salacious and sensational material, and the revival of allegations that have already been debunked.legations that have already been debunked.)
  • Washington Post's slogan vs their paywall - Workflow  + (The slogan of the Washington post is: Democracy Dies in Darkness. But they do put their news behind a paywall so it isn't accessible for everyone. Are they hypocritical or is it acceptabel?)
  • Smoketest 12/8 - Workflow  + (The work that is done is not working Or does it?)
  • Economic Support and Inflation - Workflow  + (There is a popular narrative making the roThere is a popular narrative making the rounds that theUS government's stimulus aid to Americans during the height pandemic had big economic benefits — but it also fueled inflation. How do we know that government aid isn’t the reason the economy’s tanking now? Just by looking around the world, and observing. If it were the case that stimulus led to inflation, then of course countries with the greatest support would have the highest inflation. But that’s not true. Europe, which offered people way, way more support than America and the UK, has lower inflation rates. And plenty of countries which offered people no support — because they’re poor nations — have skyrocketing inflation rates. </br></br>It’s not about stimulus.</br></br>This isn’t demand-led inflation. When people subscribe to this naive pop myth that “printing money during the pandemic caused inflation,” what are they really saying? That the economy’s cratering right now because people have too much money. LOL. Do you know anyone who has too much money? That’s an absurd thing to say.</br></br>This is supply side inflation: for example, tampons and baby formula at the moment.</br></br>Why? One reason is Covid — it caused labour shortages across sectors from healthcare to transportation. But the bigger picture here is about climate change and resource depletion. And the failure of industrialized capitalism, which is extractive, Exploitative. Rent-seeking. It doesn’t nourish, create, care, give birth to, just manufactures lowest-common-denominator stuff and literally turn life into death: plastic, fossil fuels, forests ripped down, oceans polluted, skies full of carbon, rivers turned to poison. They take without giving,</br></br>As the resources of the planet dwindle, in anticipation, warlords and oligarchs start conflicts to try and seize what of them they can.ts to try and seize what of them they can.)
  • VCorpInvents Robot Lie - Workflow  + (These three different comments cannot justThese three different comments cannot just be three humans. It is a bot pretending to be a human being and isn't going to tell the whole truth.</br></br>Responses to one of the most popular youtube sites for investing in crypto / NFTs</br>Lisa Baldwin</br>Lisa Baldwin</br>2 months ago</br>I greatly appreciate your honesty and how this worked out for you. </br>I’m trying to learn this and integrate this strategy into my portfolio, </br>just wanna do it right. This helps a lot. Learning what not to do is as valuable as </br>learning what to do, this video provides both but later on I was convinced to try </br>out packages of Vcorpinvest.Com which have yielded lot more profits.takeouttakeout</br></br></br></br>Mariamm</br>Mariamm</br>2 months ago</br>Your videos are amazing and very helpful. I am a 41 year old father </br>of 5 that's busts my but everyday doing electrical. A few years </br>ago I got into crypto and been trying to figure trading out on my own but </br>ended up investing instead with VCORPINVEST.COM . Your videos are a big help! </br>Glad I could figure it out and was able to get out of debt and be with my kids more oftenstayhomestayhomestayhome</br></br></br></br></br>Roberts</br>Roberts</br>2 months ago</br>This was my first steps into the Cryptocurrency world and </br>for the first time when trading I have felt confident in my </br>decisions. I have made 3 times on my trading capital under 3 months </br>and with the market making large moves and the support and mentoring </br>I get from VCORPINVEST.COM I am going for even bigger goals. Platinum </br>Academy has provided me the support I needed to really make my trading better. </br>I’m also thinking of taking their Forex course next year so I have more eggs in more baskets.</br>stayhomestayhomestayhomestayhome baskets. stayhomestayhomestayhomestayhome)
  • The anti vax group lied about the context of the film - Workflow  + (They told Naomi the interview was for a informative interview but it was for an anti vaccine group.)
  • Test Case 1 - Workflow  + (This guy told a lie.)
  • This is a case - Workflow  + (This is a case)
  • Amazon TS Lie - Workflow  + (This is a crazy situation where Amazon's TThis is a crazy situation where Amazon's Terms of Service contain a conditional requirement based on an impossible event: a Zombie attack. What does this do the users understanding and trust that AWS has any credibility in any of its Terms of Service.</br>Details here : https://medium.com/liecatcher/item-42-10-amazon-web-services-terms-of-service-a9227d19de67</br>42.10. Acceptable Use; Safety-Critical Systems. Your use of the Lumberyard Materials must comply with the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. The Lumberyard Materials are not intended for use with life-critical or safety-critical systems, such as use in operation of medical equipment, automated transportation systems, autonomous vehicles, aircraft or air traffic control, nuclear facilities, manned spacecraft, or military use in connection with live combat. However, this restriction will not apply in the event of the occurrence (certified by the United States Centers for Disease Control or successor body) of a widespread viral infection transmitted via bites or contact with bodily fluids that causes human corpses to reanimate and seek to consume living human flesh, blood, brain or nerve tissue and is likely to result in the fall of organized civilization.ult in the fall of organized civilization.)
  • Bull and Crow: Crow says Farmer Lies to Bull - Workflow  + (This is a lie of self-deception that the Bull has that the Farmer has not told him the whole truth. The Crow is trying to tell him the whole truth but he is not believing it.)
  • Rothschild Tweet Lie - Workflow  + (This is a lot of people accusing lies abouThis is a lot of people accusing lies about someone telling the truth with</br>some factual errors.</br></br>The question is what to take to court?</br></br>David Rothschild 🇺🇦@DavMicRot·Feb 26I owe a blanket </br>apology to all of my trolls for failing to properly </br>footnote every tweet, and I really appreciate them holding me </br>to account for that. I know how important detailed, technical accountability is for the right-wing/Russians</br> on social media.8870636</br></br>True Scotsman@truescotsman7·Feb 26</br>Ah yes, every person who calls you out on your misinformation and lies is “Russian.”</br></br>You have no shame.</br></br>35104David Rothschild 🇺🇦@DavMicRot·Feb 26Sorry, </br>should have said right-wing and/or Russian trolls ... </br>You guys are so good at catching technical details, thanks for keeping me on my toes!details, thanks for keeping me on my toes!)
  • Smoketest 2 12/8 - Workflow  + (This is a test test ing)
  • Daniel Webster Quote - Workflow  + (This is a the truth to anyone from left orThis is a the truth to anyone from left or right but a lie to the other from the right or left in the context of who is speaking it. </br>#2A Wisdom</br>@2AWisdom</br>God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it. - Daniel Webster</br></br>I believe Webster spoke or wrote it, and it doesn't matter what context he was coming from since it would only reinforce the accusation either way. only reinforce the accusation either way.)
  • Vaccination Ad Lie - Workflow  + (This person has tweeted a lie that says that vaccination ads do not exist and that this is because they would have to tell people about the side effects. There are many reasons this is not true ... including there are ads. And it is not a prescribed drug.)
  • fake owls - Workflow  + (This person shows pictures of birds on TwiThis person shows pictures of birds on Twitter and this particular picture is not of any bird that is possible. It looks to a bird expert lie a photoshop of two birds with fur not feathers from a Pomeranian Dog.</br></br>A world class expert says</br>Here is a comment from an expert birder contacted to see if she</br>could name this kind of owl.</br></br>Sheree Daugherty</br>Sat, Dec 11, 2021, 6:53 PM</br>to me</br></br>I’d say a cross between an owl and a Pomeranian. Photoshop at it’s finest!d a Pomeranian. Photoshop at it’s finest!)
  • fake owls - Workflow  + (This person shows pictures of birds on TwiThis person shows pictures of birds on Twitter and this particular picture is not of any bird that is possible. It looks to a bird expert lie a photoshop of two birds with fur not feathers from a Pomeranian Dog.</br></br>A world class expert says</br>Here is a comment from an expert birder contacted to see if she</br>could name this kind of owl.</br></br>Sheree Daugherty</br>Sat, Dec 11, 2021, 6:53 PM</br>to me</br></br>I’d say a cross between an owl and a Pomeranian. Photoshop at it’s finest!d a Pomeranian. Photoshop at it’s finest!)
  • Bas Couwenberg - Workflow  + (Tr)
  • Ban sober drivers to save them - Workflow  + (Tries to convince people with a false and stupid claim)
  • Trum is Losing His MoJo - Workflow  + (Trump’s critics say the once-dominant TrumTrump’s critics say the once-dominant Trump is losing his mojo.</br></br>Trump’s endorsement is sought by lots of Republican primary candidates, many of whom have journeyed to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida to pay homage.</br>On the other hand, the indifferent performance of some Trump-endorsed candidates has fueled doubts about the former president’s political judgement and power.</br></br>Former President Trump is taking a fresh gamble with his political capital by endorsing former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R).</br></br>His endorsement of former Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) against incumbent Gov. Brian Kemp (R) in Georgia has not marked any sea-change in the race. A Fox News poll last month showed Kemp leading by 11 points among Republican primary voters.</br></br>Similar questions have swirled around Rep. Ted Budd (R-N.C.), whom Trump endorsed in a Senate primary in the Tar Heel State. Former Gov. Pat McCrory (R) appears to have the advantage there.</br></br>Trump’s pick in Pennsylvania’s Senate primary, Sean Parnell, suspended his campaign late last year amid a messy custody battle with his estranged wife. And Trump last month rescinded his endorsement of Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) in Alabama’s Senate primary — which in turn prompted Brooks to speak out about Trump’s calls to overturn the 2020 election.</br></br>One former GOP congressman who is critical of Trump argued that “he’s a diminished figure. That’s not to say he’s not dangerous — especially in a Republican primary — but he’s diminished.” The former congressman said that Trump’s interventions tended to be more powerful when they were negative — lambasting a candidate for supposed disloyalty, for example — than when they took the positive shape of an endorsement.took the positive shape of an endorsement.)
  • Trump’s Truth Social is outperforming Twitter - Workflow  + (Truth Social' CEO and ex-congressman DevinTruth Social' CEO and ex-congressman Devin Nunes stumbled with wild speculation and ridiculous claims during a Fox Business Network grilling, all while bad news and ridicule of the Trump-owned social-media platform continue to pile up.</br></br>Nunes declared that Trump's new app, 'Truth Social,' was out performing Twitter. He said, “It’s clear that Twitter is kind of a ghost town. There’s not very much activity over at Twitter right now, especially when you compare it to sites like ours.” </br></br>The fact is that Twitter is vastly more popular than 'Truth Social.'</br></br>There are 217 million monetizable daily active users on Twitter, with 386,658,272</br>Twitter active users in all. https://www.internetlivestats.com</br></br>Every second, on average, around 6,000 tweets are tweeted on Twitter, which corresponds to over 350,000 tweets sent per minute, 500 million tweets per day and around 200 billion tweets per year. https://www.internetlivestats.com</br></br>Former President Donald Trump's social media app has so far failed to become a major competitor to established social networks, The Daily Beast reported on Monday. 4-4-22. Truth Social was the 36th most popular social networking app on the Apple App Store. The Beast also notes that downloads of 'Truth Social' have nosedived from a peak of 170,000 per day to fewer than 8,000 and that the app's cadre of daily active users is vanishingly small — just over 500,000. Dating apps Plenty of Fish (17) and BLK – Dating for Black Singles (25) are also outperforming 'Truth Social,' which just barely edged out LGBT dating app Grindr (39). https://theweek.com/donald-trump/1012149/trumps-truth-social-is-the-36th-most-popular-social-networking-app-on-the-most-popular-social-networking-app-on-the)
  • twitter ad free lie - Workflow  + (Twitter introduced a new service with a $3Twitter introduced a new service with a $36/yr subscription which promised ad free use of Twitter. It turns out, when you buy the subscription they did not mean ad free. The ads are all still there. What they meant was that a "article" that is linked on twitter would be ad free IF they had a deal with the publisher of that article to take payment from Twitter if the publisher would provide that article ad free. BUT the publisher could require a subscription to be ad free with the agreement with Twitter. In other words, they could put up a paywall against any links from Twitter in their agreement to be ad free. Twitter in their agreement to be ad free.)
  • Russian Invasion of Ukraine - Workflow  + (Vladimir Putin insisted recently that RussVladimir Putin insisted recently that Russia “is not going to attack anyone.” Since Russia is obviously preparing to invade Ukraine, this is a lie. The evidence to the contrary is:</br></br>** CNN reports that Ukraine has warned that Russia has 'almost completed' build-up of invasion forces near its border: https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/18/europe/ukraine-intelligence-russia-military-build-up-intl/index.html</br></br>** CNN reports that US intelligence indicates Russia preparing a false flag, agent provocateur operation to justify invasion of Ukraine: https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/14/politics/us-intelligence-russia-false-flag/index.html</br></br>** The Hill reports that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has recently stated that a Russian attack on Ukraine could be launched with 'very short notice’: https://thehill.com/policy/international/russia/590344-blinken-russian-attack-on-ukraine-could-be-launched-with-very</br></br>** The Hill reports that the White House says Russia could launch attack in Ukraine 'at any point’: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/590206-white-house-says-russia-could-launch-attack-in-ukraine-at-any-point</br></br>** The Hill reports that Russia has sent a large number of offensive troops to Belarus and massed them along its border with Ukraine, ostensibly to conduct “war games”: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/590270-russia-sends-troops-to-belarus-for-war-gamesssia-sends-troops-to-belarus-for-war-games)