Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

Verdict:AfcHie3dcGaf3hiEcd3g/2 + (THis is the label and do you see this? after saving?)
Verdict:AfcBgd9jdDaf3bgDijDd/2 + (The Bull should listen to the Crow who is telling the whole truth.)
Verdict:AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg/2 + (The Entire Article is Historically and Currently Untrue)
Verdict:AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg/4 + (The Entire Article is Historically and Currently Untrue)
Verdict:AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg/1 + (The Entire Article is Historically and Currently Untrue)
Verdict:AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg/5 + (The Entire Article is Historically and Currently Untrue)
Verdict:AfdDbd3bc3afDdbDcb3c/2 + (The Title of his article and the article is a LIE)
Verdict:AfdDbd3bc3afDdbDcb3c/3 + (The Title of his article and the article is a LIE)
Verdict:AfdDbd3bc3afDdbDcb3c/1 + (The Title of his article and the article is a LIE)
Verdict:AfdDbd3bc3afDdbDcb3c/5 + (The Title of his article and the article is a LIE)
Verdict:AfeAdi6icBafEad9fi3b/3 + (The is a factual lie)
Verdict:AfcGei0aaHaf3ge9jaAh/3 + (The labe)
Verdict:PTjClUMj-bOirLOqV-hZPZyEQd/2 + (The label is already there. It points out they lie confused the country and that state.)
Verdict:ScrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv/2 + (The lie claims these towns were evidence of Biden ballot stuffing when in fact Trump WON overwhelmingly in every town.)
Verdict:AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b/2 + (The lie would be socially acceptable if. r … The lie would be socially acceptable if. rather than being whitewash revisionism. it stated unequivocally that the RNC supports the actions of those who attacked the Capitol on January 6. 2021. because. according to the RNC. they were engaged in legitimate political discourse. In other words. the RNC would have to "own" the premise of legitimacy within the context of the US democratic process. the context of the US democratic process.)
Verdict:AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b/1 + (The lie would be socially acceptable if. r … The lie would be socially acceptable if. rather than being whitewash revisionism. it stated unequivocally that the RNC supports the actions of those who attacked the Capitol on January 6. 2021. because. according to the RNC. they were engaged in legitimate political discourse. In other words. the RNC would have to "own" the premise of legitimacy within the context of the US democratic process. the context of the US democratic process.)
Verdict:AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b/4 + (The lie would be socially acceptable if. r … The lie would be socially acceptable if. rather than being whitewash revisionism. it stated unequivocally that the RNC supports the actions of those who attacked the Capitol on January 6. 2021. because. according to the RNC. they were engaged in legitimate political discourse. In other words. the RNC would have to "own" the premise of legitimacy within the context of the US democratic process. the context of the US democratic process.)
Verdict:AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b/3 + (The lie would be socially acceptable if. r … The lie would be socially acceptable if. rather than being whitewash revisionism. it stated unequivocally that the RNC supports the actions of those who attacked the Capitol on January 6. 2021. because. according to the RNC. they were engaged in legitimate political discourse. In other words. the RNC would have to "own" the premise of legitimacy within the context of the US democratic process. the context of the US democratic process.)
Verdict:AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b/5 + (The lie would be socially acceptable if. r … The lie would be socially acceptable if. rather than being whitewash revisionism. it stated unequivocally that the RNC supports the actions of those who attacked the Capitol on January 6. 2021. because. according to the RNC. they were engaged in legitimate political discourse. In other words. the RNC would have to "own" the premise of legitimacy within the context of the US democratic process. the context of the US democratic process.)
Verdict:Afd3jcBih6afDcj3biHf/1 + (The statement should be clearly labeled as a dangerous lie)
Verdict:AfdDdaDejEafDddAde0e/2 + (The title is not factually true.)
Verdict:AfdDdaDejEafDddAde0e/1 + (The title is not factually true.)
Verdict:AfdDdaDejEafDddAde0e/3 + (The title is not factually true.)
Verdict:AfdDdaDejEafDddAde0e/5 + (The title is not factually true.)
Verdict:AfeBbg3fh6afEbbGcfHf/4 + (There is zero truth here.)

Verdict:AfcGei0aaHaf3ge9jaAh/2 + (They do mean completely ad free. The normal ads are still there.)

Verdict:AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa/5 + (They need to give a place where all of their efforts are described like cocacola.com/recycling-efforts)
Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/2 + (This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.)
Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/1 + (This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.)
Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/3 + (This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.)
Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/4 + (This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.)
Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/5 + (This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.)
Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/2 + (This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.)
Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/1 + (This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.)
Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/3 + (This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.)
Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/4 + (This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.)
Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/5 + (This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.)
Verdict:AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc/3 + (This does not discuss other factors that could be more important.)
Verdict:AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc/4 + (This does not discuss other factors that could be more important.)
Verdict:Afc9djEfd3af3id0efDc/1 + (This entire paragraph runs against what we know about word senses used properly in any language. Predications are fundamental. not word senses. to meaning.)
Verdict:Afc9djEfd3af3id0efDc/3 + (This entire paragraph runs against what we know about word senses used properly in any language. Predications are fundamental. not word senses. to meaning.)
Verdict:Afc9djEfd3af3id0efDc/4 + (This entire paragraph runs against what we know about word senses used properly in any language. Predications are fundamental. not word senses. to meaning.)
Verdict:Afc9djEfd3af3id0efDc/2 + (This entire paragraph runs against what we know about word senses used properly in any language. Predications are fundamental. not word senses. to meaning.)
Verdict:AfeAfg6fgGafEafGffGg/2 + (This is Factual Lie)
Verdict:Afd3fcHhjHafDcf3hh0h/2 + (This is German Propoganda)
Verdict:Afd3fcHhjHafDcf3hh0h/1 + (This is German Propoganda)
Verdict:Afd3fcHhjHafDcf3hh0h/4 + (This is German Propoganda)
Verdict:Afd3fcHhjHafDcf3hh0h/3 + (This is German Propoganda)
Verdict:Afd3fcHhjHafDcf3hh0h/5 + (This is German Propoganda)
Verdict:AfdAciGfeBafDac9gfEb/2 + (This is Photoshoped. Not real birds.)
Verdict:AfdAciGfeBafDac9gfEb/3 + (This is Photoshoped. Not real birds.)