Difference between revisions of "Verdict:UlvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC/2"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
| − | |||
|Role=Plaintiff | |Role=Plaintiff | ||
| + | |Workflow=Workflow/34 | ||
|Case ID=ulvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC | |Case ID=ulvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC | ||
| − | | | + | |User=User:Admin |
| + | |Truth=no | ||
| + | |Truth percentage=80 | ||
| + | |Truth text=The anti-vax group made Naomi Rogers think the film had a different context | ||
| + | |Whole truth=no | ||
| + | |Whole truth percentage=60 | ||
| + | |Whole truth text=they tried to mislead her | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth percentage=90 | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth text=the mixed it being for a documentary with it being for a film about anti-vax | ||
| + | |Deceit=They lied about the context of the documentry | ||
| + | |Deceit percentage=70 | ||
| + | |Deceit text= | ||
| + | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
| + | |Deceit intended percentage=60 | ||
| + | |Deceit intended text=when Naomi Rogers asked the people that interviewed her about other people that were being interviewed she got the following answer: "They said, 'Well, there's 'a guy' in New York, and we talked to 'somebody in New Jersey, and California,' " Rogers told NPR. "I thought it's so odd that they wouldn't tell me who these people were." | ||
| + | |Motivation=They wanted to have a prominent figure talk for their film | ||
| + | |Motivation percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Motivation text= | ||
| + | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
| + | |Social acceptability percentage=60 | ||
| + | |Social acceptability text=Because they made the perception that Naomi Rogers had a different opinion about the subject | ||
| + | |Label=Anti-vax Lie | ||
| + | |Label percentage=80 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 5 July 2021
Not permitted
