Difference between revisions of "Verdict:ScrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv/2"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
|User=User:Rhtcmu
 
 
|Role=Plaintiff
 
|Role=Plaintiff
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/19
 
|Case ID=scrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv
 
|Case ID=scrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv
|Workflow=Workflow/19
+
|User=User:Rhtcmu
 +
|Truth=no
 +
|Truth percentage=100
 +
|Whole truth=yes
 +
|Whole truth percentage=50
 +
|Whole truth text=There may be other situations where Biden won which also had complaints.  It would be be interesting to see these.
 +
|Nothing But the truth=yes
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=The evidence shows a claim which is a mixture of truth and lies.  In particular the 'witnesses' may have filed affidavits (true), but they may not observed what they thought they observed.
 +
|Deceit=To make people believe that ballot-stuffing was rampant in the Presidential Election in Georgia 2020.
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=Many of the other cases filed.
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=100
 +
|Deceit intended text=It seems impossible that the people posting this lie did not know the evidence they gave brought into question the conclusions.  Since Biden did not win in these towns, Trump did.
 +
|Motivation=The motivation was to make people believe there had been ballot-stuffing and elections cannot be trusted.
 +
|Motivation percentage=100
 +
|Motivation text=
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=100
 +
|Social acceptability text=This is an incredibly destructive example because it assumes that people did not read the actual evidence brought to the lie or make it matter that Biden did not actually win.
 +
|Label=The evidence for leads to the opposite conclusion: There was no ballot stuffing in favor of Biden.
 +
|Label percentage=80
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 12:17, 17 May 2021

Not permitted