Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/5"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
| + | |Role=Judge | ||
| + | |Workflow=Workflow/187 | ||
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h | |Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h | ||
| − | |||
|User=User:Rht5 | |User=User:Rht5 | ||
| − | | | + | |Truth=no |
| − | | | + | |Truth percentage=99 |
| + | |Truth text=No self respecting scientists would pretend to know enough to know how to answer this question but to keep looking for life. | ||
| + | |Whole truth=no | ||
| + | |Whole truth percentage=99 | ||
| + | |Whole truth text=We don't even know the limits of our knowing or being able to speculate on this question. The Drake equation proves that guesses of years ago were completely wrong in light of current knowledge...and that was only 60 years ago. | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth percentage=80 | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth text=The notion of "life" is too narrowly defined. "Life" forms could exist that are utterly beyond our comprehension, and may easily avoid the Great Filter. | ||
| + | |Deceit=While we have some assurance that the natural laws we see are throughout the observable universe, we have no idea how they work at levels of intelligence life what ever that is. | ||
| + | |Deceit percentage=99 | ||
| + | |Deceit text=- | ||
| + | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
| + | |Deceit intended percentage=99 | ||
| + | |Deceit intended text=If any person who is actually a scientist believe in any of the proposed equations, he is intentionally lyng. | ||
| + | |Motivation=The motivation if somebody does an equation is not science but fame. | ||
| + | |Motivation percentage=75 | ||
| + | |Motivation text=- | ||
| + | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
| + | |Social acceptability percentage=50 | ||
| + | |Social acceptability text=We should be truthful and nevertheless know we need to be looking for intelligent life in order to know if it exists, and that is the ONLY way. | ||
| + | |Label=This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions. | ||
| + | |Label percentage=100 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:27, 16 November 2022
Not permitted
