Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/1"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Juror
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/187
 
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
 
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|Workflow=Workflow/187
 
 
|User=User:Justin
 
|User=User:Justin
|Role=Juror
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/1668618372
+
|Truth percentage=75
 +
|Truth text=The researchers assume that all life forms are carbon-based and subject to the natural selection process, which relies on continuous competition.
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=75
 +
|Whole truth text=There is an unstated bias that assumes that all life will be similar in development and behavior to ours.
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=75
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=The notion of "life" is too narrowly defined. "Life" forms could exist that are utterly beyond our comprehension, and may easily avoid the Great Filter.
 +
|Deceit=That all life follows "natural" laws similar or identical to what we understand.
 +
|Deceit percentage=75
 +
|Deceit text=-
 +
|Deceit intended=no
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=75
 +
|Deceit intended text=Many scientists exhibit twin biases of which they are blissfully unaware: 1) that we understand (or can understand) the fundamental nature of reality; 2) that "life" and intelligence only develops in ways that fit current science.
 +
|Motivation=The motivation is unintentional. Scientists believe that they are advancing knowledge.
 +
|Motivation percentage=75
 +
|Motivation text=-
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=50
 +
|Social acceptability text=At this point in our development as a species. these faulty assumptions are mostly benign.
 +
|Label=This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.
 +
|Label percentage=100
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:14, 16 November 2022

Not permitted