Difference between revisions of "Verdict:Aff0feBee9af6jfEbeEi/1"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Juror
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/174
 
|Case ID=Aff0feBee9af6jfEbeEi
 
|Case ID=Aff0feBee9af6jfEbeEi
|Workflow=Workflow/174
 
 
|User=User:Isophist
 
|User=User:Isophist
|Role=Juror
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/1660752411
+
|Truth percentage=95
 +
|Truth text=There could well be "hate" at the core of these two people's invective
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=90
 +
|Whole truth text=From the outside of this dialogue it is difficult to assess the "truthiness" underlying these claims and counterclaims, but likely it is not the whole truth
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=90
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=Is there any truth conveyed in the interchanges?
 +
|Deceit=Whether it is deceit or delusion is difficult to ascertain
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=-
 +
|Deceit intended=no
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=50
 +
|Deceit intended text=There may be no consciousness of deceit because of raving ideology
 +
|Motivation=It could be hate, it could be fear, it could be sociopathy
 +
|Motivation percentage=
 +
|Motivation text=
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=100
 +
|Label=Dialogue without communication - a lie-slinging example
 +
|Label percentage=100
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 16:24, 17 August 2022

Not permitted