Difference between revisions of "Verdict:Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe/1"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Judge
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/173
 
|Case ID=Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe
 
|Case ID=Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe
|Workflow=Workflow/173
 
 
|User=User:Frank
 
|User=User:Frank
|Role=Judge
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/1660568640
+
|Truth percentage=60
 +
|Truth text=I believe it is a concept that can perhaps inspire new city mechanisms but it isn't how everyone in cities is going to live.
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=80
 +
|Whole truth text=It is a very interesting concept but stating that it will tackle all issues and be the future of cities is not very likely
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=60
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=-It's a PR stunt
 +
|Deceit=That this vision will change the whole world
 +
|Deceit percentage=80
 +
|Deceit text=-
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=90
 +
|Deceit intended text=It definitely is used as a big pr stunt for the region
 +
|Motivation=Getting a better image because at this moment they are one of the main oil producers of the world and have issues with human rights
 +
|Motivation percentage=95
 +
|Motivation text=-
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=90
 +
|Social acceptability text=We should discern PR from real projects
 +
|Label=Future vision concept which is primarily for PR and is  being overestimated
 +
|Label percentage=75
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 13:31, 15 August 2022

Not permitted