Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc/2"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
|User=User:Frank
 
 
|Role=Plaintiff
 
|Role=Plaintiff
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/164
 
|Case ID=AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc
 
|Case ID=AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc
|Workflow=Workflow/164
+
|User=User:Frank
 +
|Truth=no
 +
|Truth percentage=80
 +
|Truth text=There may have been a momentary and small effect on inflation, but economic stimulus is not the underlying reason.
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=85
 +
|Whole truth text=The whole truth would include a discussion about supply side causes, climate change, and resource depletion.
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=To adopt this reasoning is to ignore the root causes.
 +
|Deceit=The deceit is that the Covid stimulus payments by the US government is causing inflation in America.
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=80
 +
|Deceit intended text=The claim is , to a small extent, based in ignorance, but to a larger extent is being intentionally to deceive the public.
 +
|Motivation=To deflect attention away from the root causes--climate change and resource depletion.
 +
|Motivation percentage=100
 +
|Motivation text=
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=100
 +
|Social acceptability text=We can't solve problems if they are not honestly articulated.
 +
|Label=This is a factual misstatement
 +
|Label percentage=100
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 11:13, 20 June 2022

Not permitted