Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa/5"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Judge
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/151
 
|Case ID=AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa
 
|Case ID=AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa
|Workflow=Workflow/151
 
 
|User=User:Rht5
 
|User=User:Rht5
|Role=Judge
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/1652889055
+
|Truth percentage=60
 +
|Truth text=The advertising they are performing is sort of the truth
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=100
 +
|Whole truth text=They don't mention that it has almost zero impact and that they are still the biggest plastic polluters
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=Corporate sustainability managers know that actions to make "recyclable" containers are totally separate from society's capacity to actually recycle the containers. Seeing the recycle symbol makes consumers feel better but does not change the actual amount of pollution.
 +
|Deceit=They are helping the environment and their actions are working
 +
|Deceit percentage=90
 +
|Deceit text=-
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=100
 +
|Deceit intended text=Coca-cola knows that the composition of their containers is only part of the problem - a system to actually recycle all of the plastic that they generate worldwide simply doesn't exist.
 +
|Motivation=They want to make themselves look good.
 +
|Motivation percentage=
 +
|Motivation text=-
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=20
 +
|Social acceptability text=The question that is good to discuss. Is the plastic waste the cause of the consumer trowing it away or the company selling the products to these customers that can pollute the world.
 +
|Label=They need to give a place where all of their efforts are described like cocacola.com/recycling-efforts
 +
 
 +
|Label percentage=100
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 16:23, 18 May 2022

Not permitted