Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfdAha9cfDafDahAic6d/4"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Judge
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/101
 
|Case ID=AfdAha9cfDafDahAic6d
 
|Case ID=AfdAha9cfDafDahAic6d
|Workflow=Workflow/101
 
 
|User=User:Bas
 
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Judge
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/185
+
|Truth percentage=100
 +
|Truth text=test
 +
|Whole truth=yes
 +
|Whole truth percentage=100
 +
|Whole truth text=There was nothing else to say. The original lie was proven.
 +
|Nothing But the truth=yes
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=Again, it was a lie on a lie which was all true.
 +
|Deceit=To fake a belief that was obviously fake.
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=-
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=100
 +
|Deceit intended text=It was intended to be seen as a satirical remark.
 +
|Motivation=To indicate that this Senator lies a lot.
 +
|Motivation percentage=100
 +
|Motivation text=-
 +
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=100
 +
|Social acceptability text=This was so plainly a satire that was true that it is very acceptable.
 +
|Label=No Label Needed
 +
|Label percentage=100
 +
|Label text=So clearly satirical it does not need a label.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 14:30, 10 January 2022

Not permitted