]> 2026-04-10T20:03:00+00:00 Verdict:UlvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC/3 3000 en ulvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC Verdict None They tried to let Naomi Rogers think it was for an open interview but the real film was to support anti vax. They didn't give clear answers when she asked for more information about the other people being interviewd. yes 100 They intentionally didn't tell the truth when Naomi Rogers asked for more information about the other people being intevriewd. 100 - Anti vax lie 50 Letting people think that Naomi Rogers is an anti-vax person. 80 - no 100 - Plaintiff Unacceptable 100 It is unacceptable to change the view of experts to conform with your own point of view. It is meant to misslead the people that watch it. no 100 The anti-vax group didn't tell the real of the interview no 100 - 2021-07-19T10:47:01Z 2459414.9493171 UlvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC/3 911