]> 2026-04-10T11:41:03+00:00 Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/5 3000 en AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h Verdict None While we have some assurance that the natural laws we see are throughout the observable universe. we have no idea how they work at levels of intelligence life what ever that is. yes 99 If any person who is actually a scientist believe in any of the proposed equations. he is intentionally lyng. 99 - This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions. 100 The motivation if somebody does an equation is not science but fame. 75 - no 80 The notion of "life" is too narrowly defined. "Life" forms could exist that are utterly beyond our comprehension, and may easily avoid the Great Filter. Judge Unacceptable 50 We should be truthful and nevertheless know we need to be looking for intelligent life in order to know if it exists. and that is the ONLY way. no 99 No self respecting scientists would pretend to know enough to know how to answer this question but to keep looking for life. no 99 We don't even know the limits of our knowing or being able to speculate on this question. The Drake equation proves that guesses of years ago were completely wrong in light of current knowledge...and that was only 60 years ago. 2022-11-16T17:27:46Z 2459900.2276157 AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/5 2172