]> 2026-04-10T06:54:17+00:00 Verdict:Aff0jf3dj0af6jj6cd0j/2 3000 en Aff0jf3dj0af6jj6cd0j Verdict None The deceit is that by engaging in Farm-to-Table eating. we are helping our health. the environment. the local economy. and addressing hunger issues by making more nutritious food widely available. yes 90 Some proponents of this practice are sincere. but for the most part it is a marketing ploy spread by the restaurant and food industry. 100 I believe that this is essentially a disguised marketing campaign. An incomplete claim about the value of the Farm-to-Table movement 100 The populace should be made aware of the fact that the issue is more complicated than this facile solution would make it seem. To encourage eating out in partner restaurants and to promote local market shopping. 100 - no 100 The food supply issue is complicated, especially when it come to farming's effect on the climate. This claim is presented as a simplistic panacea to a multi-pronged issue. Plaintiff Acceptable 50 The potential for benefits exist. so in that regard. the lie is acceptable no 60 While eating farm fresh food has the potential to be good for us, it may not be all that much better, either for us or the planet no 100 The benefits of local farming and local consumption may exist. especially regarding the superior taste of fresh farm food. but rigorous studies haven't been done. neither on nutrition or economic impact. 2022-08-09T17:41:27Z 2459801.2371181 Aff0jf3dj0af6jj6cd0j/2 1971