Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

Janet Yellen misleads about cryptocurrency - Workflow + (Janet Yellen on Crypto April 7, 2022 at A … Janet Yellen on CryptoApril 7, 2022 at American University’s Kogod School of Business Center for Innovation.https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0706https://www.forbes.com/sites/danrunkevicius/2022/04/15/national-security-yellen-let-slip-her-plan-to-regulate-crypto-as-the-price-of-bitcoin-ethereum-bnb-xrp-solana-cardano-and-dogecoin-sink/?sh=267b48e6ad75Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen gave her first speech about cryptocurrencies and their regulation. While her address had an unexpected pro-crypto undertone, Yellen called for a tougher regulatory stance."Proponents believe distributed ledger technology will transform other aspects of financial services like trading, borrowing, and lending. They point to capabilities, like smart contracts, which use computer code to automatically execute an agreement if certain prespecified conditions are met. To the extent that setup is more convenient, and costs are competitive with those required for traditional financial services, digital assets offer the potential to expand access."“Consumers should be protected from fraud regardless of whether assets are stored on a balance sheet or distributed ledger…. Money-laundering and other illicit activity should be deemed illegal, and it doesn’t matter whether you’re using checks, wires or cryptocurrency,” she said.The Digital DollarFor much of the past century, the dollar enjoyed the benefits of the world’s reserve currency. And Yellen stressed that retaining this privilege should be regulators’ priority in their approach to digital assets.Yellen believes, that while the government should push for financial innovation that ensures “competitiveness and growth,” it should also pursue its “national security interests.”She suggested that a central bank-issued digital currency (CBDC) could fulfill the need for a digital currency while retaining America’s reserve currency privilege."... a CBDC could be the next evolution in our currency. A recent report by the Federal Reserve opened a public dialogue about CBDCs and the potential benefits and risks that could be associated with issuing one in the U.S."Later she made an explicit remark that clarified her stance on the decentralized vs. centralized currency debate: "Sovereign money is the core of a well-functioning financial system," she said.l-functioning financial system," she said.)
Rogan Spotify AntiVax Lie - Workflow + (John Oberlin @OMGno2trump · 8h When Spotif … John Oberlin@OMGno2trump·8hWhen Spotify pays Joe Rogan $100 million dollars they aren't supporting him, they're sponsoring and subsidizing him, his politics, his disinformation and antivaxxers.Quote TweetPink Peonies 2014@PinkPeonies2014 · 14hNow that Willie Nelson, Bruce Springsteen, Barbra Streisand, Queen, Paul McCartney, The Rolling Stones, Dave Grohl, Joni Mitchell, & Pearl Jam have joined Neil Young, how do you think Spotify feels about its decision to support Joe Rogan?lieReplying to @NoLieWithBTCSpotify takes the money from subscribers and pays Joe Rogan to spread misinformation that may harm and kill people. So, subscribers are sponsoring pain and deathNo Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen@NoLieWithBTCSpotify isn’t just hosting Joe Rogan. They signed a $100 million contract with him to host his content exclusively on their platform.This isn’t about censorship. It’s about the misinformation that Spotify is financially SPONSORING.https://twitter.com/raven_valkyrie/status/1487958722508996612?s=20&t=yzot7W-cGu77pGW_klULzwgoogle search confirming 100M pay to Rogan by Spotify that "depends on performance"Spotify IS supporting him, even if they say they aren't and say they cannot tell him what to say. They had the option of not signing him if he was going to be evil.ion of not signing him if he was going to be evil.)
Elon Musk actually does pay taxes - Workflow + (Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Pe … Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Person of the Year will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else.While he is paying around 12 bilion dollar worth of taxes over 2021. He also said it is the largest tax payment an US individual has ever done.ax payment an US individual has ever done.)
Elon Musk actually does not pay taxes - Workflow + (Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Pe … Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Person of the Year will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else.While is going to pay around 12 bilion dollar worth of taxes over 2021. He also said it is the largest tax payment an US individual has ever done.ax payment an US individual has ever done.)
- Workflow + (Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Pe … Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Person of the Year will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else.While is going to pay around 12 bilion dollar worth of taxes over 2021. He also said it is the largest tax payment an US individual has ever done.The filings he has made with the Securities and Exchange Commission about his recent stock trades back up that massive number. stock trades back up that massive number.)
Test Case # 239456.345.b - Workflow + (Liars never lie...)
Putin Loves Children and Parents - Workflow + (Meeting with Commissioner for Children's R … Meeting with Commissioner for Children's Rights Maria Lvova-Belova This is a meeting after the world had started condemning Putin for killing children and mothers in UKraine. In a day of meetings with world leaders not internet Russian groups.The lie is that this is propoganda to make Putin looks like he cares about children and mothers in Ukraine or Russia for that matter.hers in Ukraine or Russia for that matter.)
Test case for the rehearsal this afternoon - Workflow + (Merel can repair the wiki, the wiki was broken)
Debating transgender athletics is not transphobic - Workflow + (On Transgender Athletes Debate David Whar … On Transgender Athletes DebateDavid Wharton, latimes.com, tweeted the following on Jun 20, regarding an article the LA Times published on transgender athletic issues (As Title IX turns 50, it plays a surprise role in transgender athlete access debate):"The 1st thing you should know: Lots of people on both sides of the #transgender athlete argument are passionate & sincere. Not just politics, but real concern for the sports they love & for human dignity. @feliceduffy"https://twitter.com/LATimesWharton/status/1538923817979981824Solomon Georgio tweeted the following response"Both sides my ass. This is a direct attack on trans women and an insult to all women. It is indirectly saying that trans women are men and men are better athletes than women. There is a right and wrong side to this debate and it’s not the transphobic one."https://twitter.com/solomongeorgio/status/1538982308794859520I think the Georgio tweet is dishonest on it's face and attempts to present a false dilemma.1) Wharton doesn't explicitly reference trans women athletes in his tweet (although they are prominent in his published LA Times article); 2) Wharton's article attempts to present both sides - it is not "a direct attack on trans women and an insult to all women."; 3) There are separate men's and women's sporting competitions because men and women are physically different and in many sports male size, muscle mass and strength are advantageous. This is not valuing male athletic achievement over female athletic achievement but recognizing the physical factors that contribute to athletic performance, which in many instances give men and advantage over women in heads-to-head competition. To explicitly discuss these differences is not transphobic, in my opinion. One can support transgender identity and equal protection under the law on the one hand, but not necessarily support transgender athletes as "equivalent" when it comes to athletic competition.equivalent" when it comes to athletic competition.)
Heading towards total anarchy - Workflow + (On the Tim Ferris show podcast Balaji made the following statement: far Left and far right agree that institutions with power are terrible. His prediction is that we are moving towards a anarchy where police gets defunded and government has less control)
The US is a Christian Nation - Workflow + (Politico reports that Doug Mastriano, the … Politico reports that Doug Mastriano, the Republican nominee for governor in Pennsylvania, has argued that America is a Christian nation and that the separation of church and state is a “myth.” https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736 The " The Establishment Clause," the first clause in the Bill of Rights, states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” respecting an establishment of religion.”)
Representative Perry Calls January 6 Committee Hearings a "Soviet-Style Show Trial" - Workflow + (Rep. Scott Perry, Republican-PA, blasts th … Rep. Scott Perry, Republican-PA, blasts the January 6 Committee ahead of a series of public hearings on the attack on the Capitol for wasting millions of taxpayer dollars for a "Soviet-style show trial" that is "an affront to our American republic, and to the order and the rule of law and to justice."I contend that this not only partisan hyperbole but also and intentional mis-characterizion of the committee's purpose and process.Perry is chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, a congressional caucus consisting of conservative Republican members of the United States House of Representatives. It is generally considered to be the most conservative bloc within the House Republican Conference. Its members hold socially and fiscally conservative views, and most are supportive of Donald Trump.Perry was also specifically mentioned by Rep. Liz Cheney during the first hearing as being one of several House Republican lawmakers that contacted the White House in the weeks after Jan. 6, 2021 to seek presidential pardons for their roles in attempting to overturn the presidential election results. He was supoenaed by the committee about to testify about his role in the insurrection which he defied.A show trial is a public trial in which the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt or innocence of the defendant. The actual trial has as its only goal the presentation of both the accusation and the verdict to the public so they will serve as both an impressive example and a warning to other would-be dissidents or transgressors.Show trials tend to be retributive rather than corrective and they are also conducted for propagandistic purposes. When aimed at individuals on the basis of protected classes or characteristics, such trials are examples of political persecution. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Show_trial">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Show_trial</a>Was Benghazi a show trial?June 28, 2016The Benghazi Select Committee, a Republican-lead effort that cost about $7 million dollars and held 33 hearings over more than two years into a topic that had already been investigated by seven other Congressional committees. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton loomed large in the House Republican probe of the deaths of the U.S. ambassador to Libya in the Benghazi attack. Hauled before a GOP panel, she was grilled for eight hours. On Tuesday, an 800-page report landed and House Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-SC, denied the probe was ever about Clinton. In a Sept. 29 [2015]interview with Fox News Channel, House Majority Leader (and then-speaker-in-waiting) McCarthy was pressed by Sean Hannity to name an accomplishment in the Republican-led Congress. He finally said:"Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? They're dropping."mittee. What are her numbers today? They're dropping.")
satire of Sen Johnson lie - Workflow + (Ron Johnson lied about a pledge he had sig … Ron Johnson lied about a pledge he had signed, and a commenter on Twitter responded with a satirical lie. The question is whether the commenter was lying or telling the truth. I argue that the commenter was lying, but in this case the lie was a good satirical remark. A good lie.BREAKING: Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson, one of former President Trump’s most vocal supporters, says he will seek reelection. Johnson had pledged not to run for a third time, but he, says circumstances have changed now that Democrats control the Senate.https://twitter.com/AP/status/1480185599114027010?s=20This is the satirical response. Chris America@Chris_America·22hReplying to @APHe went back on his word? Shocking.https://twitter.com/Chris_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20is_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20)
satire of Sen Johnson lie - Workflow + (Ron Johnson lied about a pledge he had sig … Ron Johnson lied about a pledge he had signed, and a commenter on Twitter responded with a satirical lie. The question is whether the commenter was lying or telling the truth. I argue that the commenter was lying, but in this case the lie was a good satirical remark. A good lie.BREAKING: Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson, one of former President Trump’s most vocal supporters, says he will seek reelection. Johnson had pledged not to run for a third time, but he, says circumstances have changed now that Democrats control the Senate.https://twitter.com/AP/status/1480185599114027010?s=20This is the satirical response. Chris America@Chris_America·22hReplying to @APHe went back on his word? Shocking.https://twitter.com/Chris_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20is_America/status/1480191953509789697?s=20)
viral rumor lie - Workflow + (Rumors are lies. This slide looks at princ … Rumors are lies. This slide looks at principles for causing rumors to go viral. One is a slogan. #Disinformation 101 - helping you to understand and recognize cognitive attacks and attempts to manipulate you from an offensive perspective. The success of such attacks heavily depends on you NOT understanding and recognizing them.Rumors #18Rand Waltzman@cogsecThe slogan type rumor (WWII rumor in England.. "England will fight to the last Frenchman") is especially adapted to summarizing opinions or attitudes that arealready widely accepted. Slogan type rumors will gain acceptance only when the ground has been prepared for them by narrative type rumors or by other forms of propaganda.Analysis of the motivation in this slogan rumor lie: We English should not be fighting for the French. They aren't worth it.note: #disinformation for finding ICoL suit materialinformation for finding ICoL suit material)
Cruz wants to abolish doors - Workflow + (Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has continually … Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has continually put forward a lie—that we don’t need gun control in the US. Now he is spreading a lie about that lie! He says the best way to avoid school shooting is to make schools more like prisons or military facilities, to “harden” them. The general idea, apparently, is that if a school has one point of entry, and that doorway is well guarded, a gunman might have greater difficulty killing people inside. Who needs gun control, the argument goes, when all we really need is door control.There are a variety of reasons this is a difficult idea to take seriously.First, I’m reasonably sure this would be a serious fire hazard in many school buildings nationwide.Second, a lot of schools have windows.Third, what about schools made up of several buildings, with students walking outdoors between them. Mandating “one door that goes in and out of the school” would be literally impossible.Fourth, mass shootings don’t just happen in schools — and I’m not sure having one entry point to a grocery store is realistic.Finally, there’s also reason to be skeptical of the underlying point. Juliette Kayyem, a veteran of the Obama administration’s Department of Homeland Security, and currently a lecturer in international security at Harvard, wrote on Twitter, “The ‘one door’ theory of schools is not how we think about education or design, but it’s also not how we think about security. It actually is bad safety planning. A ‘psychopath’ would then just target the kids backed up in line and waiting for this ‘one door’ to let them through.”Or put another way, those looking at Cruz’s idea as a credible policy proposal are almost certainly making a mistake.https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/latest-school-shooting-ted-cruz-focuses-doors-rcna30630URL: https://www.salon.com/2022/05/26/ted-cruz-thinks-he-has-a-better-solution-to-uvalde-school-than-control-door-control/o-uvalde-school-than-control-door-control/)
Short phrase - Workflow + (Short phrase)
Confirmation Bias - Workflow + (Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn said of … Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn said of nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson that “You have made clear that you believe judges must consider critical race theory when deciding how to sentence criminal defendants.”Blackburn was referring to a 2015 speech in which Jackson described how she encouraged students to study federal sentencing policy as an academic area implicating many topics.“Sentencing is just plain interesting on an intellectual level, in part because it melds together myriad types of law — criminal law, of course, but also administrative law, constitutional law, critical race theory, negotiations, and to some extent, even contracts,” Jackson said in her speech. “And if that’s not enough to prove to them that sentencing is a subject ... worth studying, I point out that sentencing policy implicates and intersects with various other intellectual disciplines as well, including philosophy, psychology, history, statistics, economics, and politics.”In other words, she indicates that critical race theory might be one of many potential factors in play in sentencing, not a mandatory consideration.sentencing, not a mandatory consideration.)
Bas Couwenberg - Workflow + (Test)
test22222 - Workflow + (Test)
test - Workflow + (Test)
Test - Workflow + (Test)
Test - Workflow + (Test)
Test - Workflow + (Test)
testing - Workflow + (Testing)

Testing in Safari - Workflow + (Testing in Safari)

Bull and Crow: Crow says Farmer Lies to Bull - Workflow + (The Crow is trying to convince the Bull that the Farmer does not tell the whole truth of his situation to the Bull. He provides a series of arguments that the Bull needs to believe to run away from the farmer before the farmer slaughters him.)
Bull and Crow: Crow says Farmer Lies to Bull - Workflow + (The Crow is trying to convince the Bull th … The Crow is trying to convince the Bull that the Farmer does not tell the whole truth of his situation to the Bull. He provides a series of arguments that the Bull needs to believe to run away from the farmer before the farmer slaughters him. These truthful arguments are the evidence...and we all know the crow is telling the truth.we all know the crow is telling the truth.)
Bull and Crow: Bull says Crow Lies - Workflow + (The Crow tries to tell Bull why he is factually lying to himself. Bull thinks Crow is lying but in fact Bull is factually lying to himself. The evidence is self-evident by anyone with any experience with raising Cattle.)
Apple doesn't want to be forced to use usb-c - Workflow + (The EU has forced apple to use USB type c on their next devices. This will allow people to use one cable to charge all their new devices, but apple isn't happy with this. Greg Joswiak said this mandatory standard hinders innovation.)
Bull and Crow : Farmer says Crow Lies - Workflow + (The Farmer says it is OK to not reveal everything and to keep the cows happy while he is raising them by what he does and does not do.)
Trump Declassified Everything - Workflow + (The Justice Department said in a court fil … The Justice Department said in a court filing this week that the search of Mar-a-Lago resulted in the seizure of more than 100 unique documents with classification markings. But in posts on his social media platform, Trump has argued that he had declassified all of the documents in his possession."Number one, it was all declassified," he wrote in a post on August 12. "Lucky I Declassified!" he wrote in a post this Wednesday.Trump's comments about this supposed declassification have been very vague. But conservative writer John Solomon, one of the people Trump named as a representative in his dealings with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), was more specific in a Fox appearance on August 12. Solomon read a statement, which he said was from Trump's office, claiming that Trump "had a standing order...that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."This is patently false. Trump and his team have not provided any proof that Trump actually conducted some sort of broad declassification of the documents that ended up at Mar-a-Lago. What's more, eighteen former top Trump administration officials, including two former White House chiefs of staff who spoke on the record, told CNN in August that they never heard of a standing Trump declassification order when they were serving in the administration and that they now believe the claim is false. The former officials used words like "ludicrous," "ridiculous" and "bullsh*t.""Total nonsense," said one person who served as a senior White House official. "If that's true, where is the order with his signature on it? If that were the case, there would have been tremendous pushback from the Intel Community and DoD, which would almost certainly have become known to Intel and Armed Services Committees on the Hill."nd Armed Services Committees on the Hill.")
Ronald de Boer as aambassader of Qatar lies about working conditions - Workflow + (The bad working conditions and high heat h … The bad working conditions and high heat have caused a lot of working migrants to die a by Qatar so called "natural death". UN studies have found that the high temperatures and pour working conditions have a significant impact on the high death rate under migrant workers. As a tv personal Ronald de Boer supports Qatar and says that the numbers in the news and in particular 6500 workers that died is taken out of context. And supports Qatar in their work around the World Cup preparations.I believe it is a bad lie to support a dictatorship like Qatar in the harm they do to hard working immigrants. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/23/revealed-migrant-worker-deaths-qatar-fifa-world-cup-2022https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/08/qatar-failure-to-investigate-migrant-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/)
Sleep-Lies-Walker - Workflow + (The book How We Sleep by Matthew Walker i … The book How We Sleep by Matthew Walker is filled with lies that imply causation for whatis only established correlation. As such a lossof sleep is blamed on many things which can causea loss of sleep. As if the loss of sleep is always under your control. Walker seems to believe that you can justgo to sleep whenever you are told to do it.The intro shows the fallacy in his reasoning.Ultimately, asking “Why do we sleep?” was the wrong question. It implied there was a single function, one holy grail of a reason that we slept, and we went in search of it. Theories ranged from the logical (a time for conserving energy), to the peculiar (an opportunity for eyeball oxygenation), to the psychoanalytic (a non-conscious state in which we fulfill repressed wishes). This book will reveal a very different truth: sleep is infinitely more complex, profoundly more interesting, and strikingly health-relevant. We sleep for a rich litany of functions, plural—an abundant constellation of nighttime benefits that service both our brains and our bodies. There does not seem to be one major organ within the body, or process within the brain, that isn’t optimally enhanced by sleep (and detrimentally impaired when we don’t get enough). That we receive such a bounty of health benefits each night should notWalker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (p. 6). Scribner. Kindle Edition. be surprising. After all, we are awake for two-thirds of our lives, and we don’t just achieve one useful thing during that stretch of time. We accomplish myriad undertakings that promote our own well-being and survival. Why, then, would we expect sleep—and the twenty-five to thirty years, on average, it takes from our lives—to offer one function only? Through an explosion of discoveries over the past twenty years, we have come to realize that evolution did not make a spectacular blunder in conceiving of sleep. Sleep dispenses a multitude of health-ensuring benefits, yours to pick up in repeat prescription every twenty-four hours, should you choose. Within the brain, sleep enriches a diversity of functions, including our ability to learn, memorize, and make logical decisions and choices. Benevolently servicing our psychological health, sleep recalibrates our emotional brain circuits, allowing us to navigate next-day social and psychologicalWalker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (pp. 6-7). Scribner. Kindle Edition. Other questions that can draw out signs of insufficient sleep are: If you didn’t set an alarm clock, would you sleep past that time? (If so, you need more sleep than you are giving yourself.) Do you find yourself at your computer screen reading and then rereading (and perhaps rereading again) the same sentence? (This is often a sign of a fatigued, under-slept brain.) Do you sometimes forget what color the last few traffic lights were while driving? (Simple distraction is often the cause, but a lack of sleep is another culprit.)Correlation is Not Causation Lieulprit.) Correlation is Not Causation Lie)
Flowers - Workflow + (The camelia would bloom in the spring, but it not spring and he is blooming)
Bird Names for Birds - Workflow + (The concern about eponymous and honorific … The concern about eponymous and honorific common bird names is not new. But the movement to see these names changed is.Eponyms (a person after whom a discovery, invention, place, etc., is named or thought to be named) and honorific common bird names (a name given to something in honor of a person) are problematic because they perpetuate colonialism and the racism associated with it. The names that these birds currently have—for example, Bachman’s Sparrow—represent and remember people (mainly white men) who often have objectively horrible pasts and do not uphold the morals and standards the bird community should memorialize.The vast majority of eponymous common names were applied to birds by European and American naturalists during a period of time known as colonialism, when (primarily) European countries subjugated, exploited, and populated territories held by non-white peoples. To legitimize this endeavor, the concept of race as a classification system was developed, and the white “race” and civilization were considered superior to all others. The impacts of colonialism were global, and the false concept of race used to justify colonialism resulted in the reality of racism, a reality which has structured societies, interactions, and even survival ever since.Eponymous common names are essentially verbal statues. They were made to honor the benefactor in perpetuity, and as such reflect the accomplishments and values that the creator esteemed. We are not bound by either the intention or the regard; we should make decisions about who and what we honor based on our own values, values that create a more equitable world for all. By continuing to use eponymous common bird names, we continue to reference and honor our distressful colonial heritage and the racism that was a direct consequence of this malicious exploitation. This is unacceptable, and we must do better.Current events in 2020 renewed societal emphasis on social justice and have shown that the time to reevaluate is now, and are largely why this initiative formalized. We are overdue individually, as groups and communities, and as a society to reevaluate our biases, remove barriers of all kinds, and be better. Bird Names For Birds—both the initiative and the actual bird names—will not end racism. It won’t even end all of the EDI problems within the bird community. However, it is one step. It is one problem that the bird community can be self-aware of, acknowledge, and rectify. A growing movement to reexamine names bestowed on everything from college campuses to city streets has swelled to encompass birders, ornithologists, and conservationists. Doing away with honorifics, they say, and renaming birds for the qualities that make each special, could make the birding world more inclusive for those who have long been left out or pushed away. Once unthinkable, the scientific body that governs bird names is finally embarking on a process that could redefine not only what we call myriad birds but also birding itself. About 150 of the roughly 2,000 North and Central American bird species have honorifics. Most were named for naturalists, such as Alexander Wilson, a chronicler of birdlife during the early 19th century and widely considered the father of American ornithology. The handful of names that commemorate women mostly use first names; Anna’s Hummingbird is a tribute to French courtier Anna Masséna, wife of an amateur ornithologist. While these figures don’t stir up much controversy, other species are saddled with heavier burdens.Audubon’s Shearwater and Audubon’s Oriole honor renowned avian artist John James Audubon (also the namesake of this magazine), an enslaver who collected skulls from Texas battlefields during his travels. His contemporary John Kirk Townsend plundered Native American graves; his legacy lives on with Townsend’s Warbler and Townsend’s Solitaire. Scott’s Oriole carries a banner for General Winfield Scott, who willingly accepted a leading role in the genocide of Native Americans on the Trail of Tears.of Native Americans on the Trail of Tears.)
ballot stuffing lie - Workflow + (The court filing contradicts the actual vo … The court filing contradicts the actual vote that took place. It was said that there was "egregious ballot stuffing" Yet, the canidate for which it was against, actually in all the counties the court action was about.The judge threw this case out (judges threw out all the cases filed by the Trump group). More credence this is a factual lie.up). More credence this is a factual lie.)
A lie - Workflow + (The evidence)
Ornstein Filibuster Lie 2 - Workflow + (The framers feared 'the tyranny of the maj … The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'Filibuster proponents often argue that the Constitution’s framers intended to obstruct decisions by simple majorities. In defense of the filibuster, Lewis & Clark Law School professor James Huffman wrote in the Hill that James Madison “would likely think it a brilliant innovation for preventing majority tyranny.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) wrote in the New York Times in 2019 that the filibuster is “central to the order the Constitution sets forth,” citing Madison’s view that the Senate ought to function as an “additional impediment” and a “complicated check” on the House.Ornstein says this is a lie. McConnell is lying.But other than the explicit constitutional requirements for supermajorities, such as to approve treaties, the framers were foursquare for majority votes. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 22 that allowing minorities to overrule the majority would cause “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible compromises of the public good.” Congressional Research Service scholar Walter J. Oleszek has noted: “Overall, the Framers generally favored decision-making by simple majority vote. This view is buttressed by the grant of a vote to the Vice President (Article I, section 3) in those cases where the Senators are ‘equally divided.’” This provision makes clear that the Constitution’s drafters expected that most decisions would be made by majority vote.most decisions would be made by majority vote.)
Ornstein Filibuster Lie 2 - Workflow + (The framers feared 'the tyranny of the maj … The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'Filibuster proponents often argue that the Constitution’s framers intended to obstruct decisions by simple majorities. In defense of the filibuster, Lewis & Clark Law School professor James Huffman wrote in the Hill that James Madison “would likely think it a brilliant innovation for preventing majority tyranny.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) wrote in the New York Times in 2019 that the filibuster is “central to the order the Constitution sets forth,” citing Madison’s view that the Senate ought to function as an “additional impediment” and a “complicated check” on the House.Ornstein says this is a lie. McConnell is lying.But other than the explicit constitutional requirements for supermajorities, such as to approve treaties, the framers were foursquare for majority votes. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 22 that allowing minorities to overrule the majority would cause “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible compromises of the public good.” Congressional Research Service scholar Walter J. Oleszek has noted: “Overall, the Framers generally favored decision-making by simple majority vote. This view is buttressed by the grant of a vote to the Vice President (Article I, section 3) in those cases where the Senators are ‘equally divided.’” This provision makes clear that the Constitution’s drafters expected that most decisions would be made by majority vote.most decisions would be made by majority vote.)
Testing a lie about the cold winter - Workflow + (The girl said it was cold. But i looked at the temperature and it was like 26 degrees celsius. SO it was not cold)
Hunter Bidens Laptop - Workflow + (The intelligence 'experts' who falsely dis … The intelligence 'experts' who falsely discredited Hunter Biden's laptop -- and still won't say sorry.https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/giuliani-and-the-new-york-post-are-pushing-russian-disinformation-its-a-big-test-for-the-media/ Mother JonesSusan Walsh/APFight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter. A newly discovered laptop, the FBI, a trove of emails, October, a presidential election—it sounds familiar. Especially when you add in a Russian disinformation campaign. On Wednesday, the New York Post released what it hailed as a bombshell: an unidentified computer repair store owner in Delaware had come to possess a laptop that contained Hunter Biden emails (and purportedly a sex tape), the hard drive and computer was seized by the FBI, the store owner at some point passed a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani, and one of the emails suggested that Hunter, who served on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma, may have in 2015 introduced a Burisma official to his dad, Vice President Joe Biden. The story depicts this as a big scandal, and Guiliani tweeted, “Much more to come.” But the key point of the article was predicated on false information that Giuliani has been spreading for a long time—and that appears to be linked to a Russian disinformation operation that the Post neglected to note in its article. That is, the Post piece, based on an unproven smear, is in sync with Moscow’s ongoing effort to influence the 2020 election to help President Donald Trump retain power. (The FBI and other parts of the US intelligence community have stated that Vladimir Putin is once again attacking the US political system to boost Trump.) And this story presents a challenge to the American media: how to report on an orchestrated campaign to affect the election that relies on disinformation, salacious and sensational material, and the revival of allegations that have already been debunked.legations that have already been debunked.)
Washington Post's slogan vs their paywall - Workflow + (The slogan of the Washington post is: Democracy Dies in Darkness. But they do put their news behind a paywall so it isn't accessible for everyone. Are they hypocritical or is it acceptabel?)
Smoketest 12/8 - Workflow + (The work that is done is not working Or does it?)
Economic Support and Inflation - Workflow + (There is a popular narrative making the ro … There is a popular narrative making the rounds that theUS government's stimulus aid to Americans during the height pandemic had big economic benefits — but it also fueled inflation. How do we know that government aid isn’t the reason the economy’s tanking now? Just by looking around the world, and observing. If it were the case that stimulus led to inflation, then of course countries with the greatest support would have the highest inflation. But that’s not true. Europe, which offered people way, way more support than America and the UK, has lower inflation rates. And plenty of countries which offered people no support — because they’re poor nations — have skyrocketing inflation rates. It’s not about stimulus.This isn’t demand-led inflation. When people subscribe to this naive pop myth that “printing money during the pandemic caused inflation,” what are they really saying? That the economy’s cratering right now because people have too much money. LOL. Do you know anyone who has too much money? That’s an absurd thing to say.This is supply side inflation: for example, tampons and baby formula at the moment.Why? One reason is Covid — it caused labour shortages across sectors from healthcare to transportation. But the bigger picture here is about climate change and resource depletion. And the failure of industrialized capitalism, which is extractive, Exploitative. Rent-seeking. It doesn’t nourish, create, care, give birth to, just manufactures lowest-common-denominator stuff and literally turn life into death: plastic, fossil fuels, forests ripped down, oceans polluted, skies full of carbon, rivers turned to poison. They take without giving,As the resources of the planet dwindle, in anticipation, warlords and oligarchs start conflicts to try and seize what of them they can.ts to try and seize what of them they can.)
VCorpInvents Robot Lie - Workflow + (These three different comments cannot just … These three different comments cannot just be three humans. It is a bot pretending to be a human being and isn't going to tell the whole truth.Responses to one of the most popular youtube sites for investing in crypto / NFTsLisa BaldwinLisa Baldwin2 months agoI greatly appreciate your honesty and how this worked out for you. I’m trying to learn this and integrate this strategy into my portfolio, just wanna do it right. This helps a lot. Learning what not to do is as valuable as learning what to do, this video provides both but later on I was convinced to try out packages of Vcorpinvest.Com which have yielded lot more profits.takeouttakeoutMariammMariamm2 months agoYour videos are amazing and very helpful. I am a 41 year old father of 5 that's busts my but everyday doing electrical. A few years ago I got into crypto and been trying to figure trading out on my own but ended up investing instead with VCORPINVEST.COM . Your videos are a big help! Glad I could figure it out and was able to get out of debt and be with my kids more oftenstayhomestayhomestayhomeRobertsRoberts2 months agoThis was my first steps into the Cryptocurrency world and for the first time when trading I have felt confident in my decisions. I have made 3 times on my trading capital under 3 months and with the market making large moves and the support and mentoring I get from VCORPINVEST.COM I am going for even bigger goals. Platinum Academy has provided me the support I needed to really make my trading better. I’m also thinking of taking their Forex course next year so I have more eggs in more baskets.stayhomestayhomestayhomestayhome baskets. stayhomestayhomestayhomestayhome)
The anti vax group lied about the context of the film - Workflow + (They told Naomi the interview was for a informative interview but it was for an anti vaccine group.)
Test Case 1 - Workflow + (This guy told a lie.)
This is a case - Workflow + (This is a case)
Amazon TS Lie - Workflow + (This is a crazy situation where Amazon's T … This is a crazy situation where Amazon's Terms of Service contain a conditional requirement based on an impossible event: a Zombie attack. What does this do the users understanding and trust that AWS has any credibility in any of its Terms of Service.Details here : https://medium.com/liecatcher/item-42-10-amazon-web-services-terms-of-service-a9227d19de6742.10. Acceptable Use; Safety-Critical Systems. Your use of the Lumberyard Materials must comply with the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. The Lumberyard Materials are not intended for use with life-critical or safety-critical systems, such as use in operation of medical equipment, automated transportation systems, autonomous vehicles, aircraft or air traffic control, nuclear facilities, manned spacecraft, or military use in connection with live combat. However, this restriction will not apply in the event of the occurrence (certified by the United States Centers for Disease Control or successor body) of a widespread viral infection transmitted via bites or contact with bodily fluids that causes human corpses to reanimate and seek to consume living human flesh, blood, brain or nerve tissue and is likely to result in the fall of organized civilization.ult in the fall of organized civilization.)
Bull and Crow: Crow says Farmer Lies to Bull - Workflow + (This is a lie of self-deception that the Bull has that the Farmer has not told him the whole truth. The Crow is trying to tell him the whole truth but he is not believing it.)