Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/3"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
+ | |Role=Juror | ||
+ | |Workflow=Workflow/187 | ||
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h | |Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h | ||
− | |||
|User=User:Bas | |User=User:Bas | ||
− | | | + | |Truth=no |
− | | | + | |Truth percentage=75 |
+ | |Truth text=The researchers assume that all life forms are carbon-based and subject to the natural selection process, which relies on continuous competition. | ||
+ | |||
+ | And I find it hard to believe we know how civilization would be destroyed without us ever having seen a civilization being destroyed. There are probably so many reasons, it more looks like just some guesses. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |Whole truth=no | ||
+ | |Whole truth percentage=80 | ||
+ | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
+ | |Deceit=That we have any clue what actually happens. These are some guesses | ||
+ | |Deceit percentage=95 | ||
+ | |Deceit text= | ||
+ | |Deceit intended=no | ||
+ | |Deceit intended percentage=55 | ||
+ | |Deceit intended text=They want to help the world further but actually, I would think it are some guesses. | ||
+ | |Motivation=The motivation is unintentional. Scientists believe that they are advancing knowledge. | ||
+ | |Motivation percentage=95 | ||
+ | |Motivation text=- | ||
+ | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
+ | |Social acceptability percentage=65 | ||
+ | |Social acceptability text=It isn't good to suggest this as being good science | ||
+ | |Label=This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions. | ||
+ | |Label percentage=100 | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:17, 16 November 2022
Not permitted