Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/4"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
+ | |Role=Juror | ||
+ | |Workflow=Workflow/186 | ||
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe | |Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe | ||
− | |||
|User=User:Armar | |User=User:Armar | ||
− | |||
|Name=Juror 3 | |Name=Juror 3 | ||
− | | | + | |Truth=yes |
+ | |Truth percentage=70 | ||
+ | |Whole truth=no | ||
+ | |Whole truth percentage=45 | ||
+ | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
+ | |Nothing But the truth percentage=30 | ||
+ | |Deceit=There may not be a deceit. but If there is one. it lies in discouraging a discussion of detrimental factors other than a possible constricted world-view. It also completely ignores the fact that age-related experience may be very useful in dealing with issues. | ||
+ | |Deceit percentage=50 | ||
+ | |Deceit text=While our aging leadership does seem somewhat out of touch. younger leaders throughout the world are also experiencing difficulties. | ||
+ | |Deceit intended=no | ||
+ | |Deceit intended percentage=40 | ||
+ | |Motivation=Younger politicians may make this claim to gain an electoral advantage. even if it is not 100% true. | ||
+ | |Motivation percentage=75 | ||
+ | |Motivation text=This is a sound tactic. since the media are quick to pounce on any evidence of an older politician being out of step or not "getting" some current trend. | ||
+ | |Social acceptability=Acceptable | ||
+ | |Social acceptability percentage=55 | ||
+ | |Social acceptability text=If this claim makes older politicians more aware of age-related issues that could possibly be influencing them. then the claim is acceptable. even though it may not be 100% true. | ||
+ | |Label=This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors. | ||
+ | |Label percentage=70 | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:20, 9 November 2022
Not permitted