Difference between revisions of "Verdict:Aff0jf3dj0af6jj6cd0j/4"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
| + | |Role=Judge | ||
| + | |Workflow=Workflow/172 | ||
|Case ID=Aff0jf3dj0af6jj6cd0j | |Case ID=Aff0jf3dj0af6jj6cd0j | ||
| − | |||
|User=User:Rht5 | |User=User:Rht5 | ||
| − | | | + | |Truth=no |
| − | | | + | |Truth percentage=60 |
| + | |Truth text=While eating farm fresh food has the potential to be good for us, it may not be all that much better, either for us or the planet | ||
| + | |Whole truth=no | ||
| + | |Whole truth percentage=50 | ||
| + | |Whole truth text=The benefits of local farming and local consumption may exist. especially regarding the superior taste of fresh farm food. but rigorous studies haven't been done. neither on nutrition or economic impact. | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth percentage=65 | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth text=The food supply issue is complicated, especially when it come to farming's effect on the climate. This claim is presented as a simplistic panacea to a multi-pronged issue. | ||
| + | |Deceit=The deceit is that by engaging in Farm-to-Table eating. we are helping our health. the environment. the local economy. and addressing hunger issues by making more nutritious food widely available. | ||
| + | |Deceit percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Deceit text=I believe that this is essentially a disguised marketing campaign. We know of some cases like corn where flash freezing is the best the corn can be. | ||
| + | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
| + | |Deceit intended percentage=90 | ||
| + | |Deceit intended text=Some proponents of this practice are sincere. but for the most part it is a marketing ploy spread by the restaurant and food industry. | ||
| + | |Motivation=To encourage eating out in partner restaurants and to promote local market shopping. | ||
| + | |Motivation percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Motivation text=- | ||
| + | |Social acceptability=Acceptable | ||
| + | |Social acceptability percentage=50 | ||
| + | |Social acceptability text=The potential for benefits exist. so in that regard. the lie is acceptable | ||
| + | |Label=An incomplete claim about the value of the Farm-to-Table movement | ||
| + | |Label percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Label text=The populace should be made aware of the fact that the issue is more complicated than this facile solution would make it seem. Or pointed to a chart that compares different farm produce as to whether the claims are true for that produce. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:21, 10 August 2022
Not permitted
