Difference between revisions of "Verdict:Afe9ea9dbBafEieAidBb/2"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
|User=User:Frank
 
 
|Role=Plaintiff
 
|Role=Plaintiff
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/170
 
|Case ID=Afe9ea9dbBafEieAidBb
 
|Case ID=Afe9ea9dbBafEieAidBb
|Workflow=Workflow/170
+
|User=User:Frank
 +
|Truth=yes
 +
|Truth percentage=50
 +
|Truth text=While the statement is generally true, there are many other factors at play, and a plant based diet may not be the single biggest step an individual can take.
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=50
 +
|Whole truth text=There are many other variables that this video does not consider
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=The video wants us to believe a simplistic notion of the problem of climate change
 +
|Deceit=The deceit is that there are simple solutions to the problem of climate change
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=50
 +
|Deceit intended text=The makers of the video are sincere in their belief, but it does not go far enough in exploring the issue.
 +
|Motivation=To make us give up eating meat in the mistaken belief that this alone will have a very significant impact on the environment when if fact it is only one of many contributing causes.
 +
|Motivation percentage=100
 +
|Motivation text=
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=50
 +
|Social acceptability text=This type of commentary reduces a complex problem to one simple solution.  This type of thinking is not helpful in our complicated world.
 +
|Label=This video outlines outlines one solution to a multi-faceted issue that may in fact require many approaches.
 +
|Label percentage=100
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:14, 3 August 2022

Not permitted