Difference between revisions of "Verdict:1234-1590070996-1590070996/1"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Juror
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/3
 
|Case ID=1234-1590070996-1590070996
 
|Case ID=1234-1590070996-1590070996
|Workflow=Workflow/3
 
 
|User=User:Martin
 
|User=User:Martin
|Role=Juror
 
 
|Name=Juror 2
 
|Name=Juror 2
|Participant=Participant/12
+
|Truth=yes
 +
|Truth percentage=100
 +
|Truth text=Yes, Government health coverage/plan is not financed/paid for with "someone else's money", as stated, but with tax dollars contributed by all taxpayers into the corresponding government fund which is appropriated by Congress.
 +
|Whole truth=yes
 +
|Whole truth percentage=100
 +
|Whole truth text=The premise presented as a statement of fact "it is paid for with someone else's money" is false. Programs such as this one, are paid for with tax dollars, which are a burden to all taxpayers, not to just a subset of the taxpayers.
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=The statement contains the false premise that the Government Health Plan is only paid for with "someone else's money". Hence it is not "nothing but the truth".
 +
|Deceit=The lie included in the statement by implication is that the plan is not at all paid by the users but only by a subset of taxpayers ("someone else").
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=Health programs paid by the Government are paid through a fund appropriated by Congress which is funded with tax revenues levied on all taxpayers.
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=100
 +
|Deceit intended text=The lie is used to support the lie's author's conviction that Government health plans are undesirable and intrinsically unfair.
 +
|Motivation=There may be a multiplicity of motivations. One obvious one is  that the lie is intended to support the stater's conviction that Government's health plans are intrinsically unwelcomed and unfair as their cost is not borne by the user/beneficiary but by a different subset ("someone else"). It follows from the assertions that the stater's intent is to persuade others of the injustice of such programs in which the beneficiaries do not bear the program's cost.
 +
|Motivation percentage=90
 +
|Motivation text=Stater's adamant claim that the costs of the plan are borne by a subset of the population ("someone else")
 +
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=100
 +
|Social acceptability text=The premise advanced only promotes misinformation and it is politically deeply divisive.
 +
|Label=Should be labeled as an intentional misrepresentation of facts as the assertion is purposely distorting the fact.
 +
|Label percentage=70
 +
|Label text=Social acceptability may be improved by specifically labelling the lie and redirecting to the analysis of it herein.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 20:09, 21 May 2020

Not permitted