Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc/3"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
| + | |Role=Juror | ||
| + | |Workflow=Workflow/164 | ||
|Case ID=AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc | |Case ID=AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc | ||
| − | |||
|User=User:Rht5 | |User=User:Rht5 | ||
| − | |||
|Name=Juror 2 | |Name=Juror 2 | ||
| − | | | + | |Truth=no |
| + | |Truth percentage=80 | ||
| + | |Truth text=There may have been a momentary and small effect on inflation, but economic stimulus is not the underlying reason. | ||
| + | |Whole truth=no | ||
| + | |Whole truth percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Whole truth text=The whole truth would include a discussion about supply side causes. climate change. and resource depletion. | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth percentage=50 | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth text=To adopt this reasoning is to ignore the root causes. | ||
| + | |Deceit=The deceit is that the Covid stimulus payments by the US government is causing inflation in America. | ||
| + | |Deceit percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Deceit text=- | ||
| + | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
| + | |Deceit intended percentage=30 | ||
| + | |Deceit intended text=The claim is . to a small extent. based in ignorance. but to a larger extent is being made intentionally to deceive the public. | ||
| + | |Motivation=To deflect attention away from the root causes--climate change and resource depletion. | ||
| + | |Motivation percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Motivation text=- | ||
| + | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
| + | |Social acceptability percentage=80 | ||
| + | |Social acceptability text=We can't solve problems if they are not honestly articulated. | ||
| + | |Label=This does not discuss other factors that could be more important. | ||
| + | |Label percentage=100 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 22 June 2022
Not permitted
