Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b/2"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
| − | |||
|Role=Plaintiff | |Role=Plaintiff | ||
| + | |Workflow=Workflow/115 | ||
|Case ID=AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b | |Case ID=AfdDhdGgfBafDdhDgg6b | ||
| − | | | + | |User=User:Isophist |
| + | |Truth=no | ||
| + | |Truth percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Whole truth=no | ||
| + | |Whole truth percentage=85 | ||
| + | |Whole truth text=There was political activity | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
| + | |Deceit=Describing riotous activity as political discourse | ||
| + | |Deceit percentage=98 | ||
| + | |Deceit text= | ||
| + | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
| + | |Deceit intended percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Motivation=To redefine the actions of January 6, 2021, as political activity instead of an attempted insurrection, to absolve former president Trump and his allies of sedition | ||
| + | |Motivation percentage= | ||
| + | |Motivation text= | ||
| + | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
| + | |Social acceptability percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Label=The lie would be socially acceptable if, rather than being whitewash revisionism, it stated unequivocally that the RNC supports the actions of those who attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021, because, according to the RNC, they were engaged in legitimate political discourse. In other words, the RNC would have to "own" the premise of legitimacy within the context of the US democratic process. | ||
| + | |Label percentage=70 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:28, 14 February 2022
Not permitted
