Difference between revisions of "Verdict:UlvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC/3"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
| + | |Role=Plaintiff | ||
| + | |Workflow=Workflow/34 | ||
|Case ID=ulvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC | |Case ID=ulvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC | ||
| − | |||
|User=User:Admin | |User=User:Admin | ||
| − | | | + | |Truth=no |
| − | | | + | |Truth percentage=100 |
| + | |Truth text=The anti-vax group didn't tell the real of the interview | ||
| + | |Whole truth=no | ||
| + | |Whole truth percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Deceit=They tried to let Naomi Rogers think it was for an open interview but the real film was to support anti vax. | ||
| + | |||
| + | They didn't give clear answers when she asked for more information about the other people being interviewd. | ||
| + | |Deceit percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Deceit text= | ||
| + | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
| + | |Deceit intended percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Deceit intended text=They intentionally didn't tell the truth when Naomi Rogers asked for more information about the other people being intevriewd. | ||
| + | |Motivation=Letting people think that Naomi Rogers is an anti-vax person. | ||
| + | |Motivation percentage=80 | ||
| + | |Motivation text= | ||
| + | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
| + | |Social acceptability percentage=100 | ||
| + | |Social acceptability text=It is unacceptable to change the view of experts to conform with your own point of view. It is meant to misslead the people that watch it. | ||
| + | |Label=Anti vax lie | ||
| + | |Label percentage=50 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:47, 19 July 2021
Not permitted
