Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/4"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Juror
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/186
 
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
 
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
|Workflow=Workflow/186
 
 
|User=User:Armar
 
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
 
 
|Name=Juror 3
 
|Name=Juror 3
|Participant=Participant/1668014208
+
|Truth=yes
 +
|Truth percentage=70
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=45
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=30
 +
|Deceit=There may not be a deceit. but If there is one. it lies in discouraging a discussion of detrimental factors other than a possible constricted world-view. It also completely ignores the fact that age-related experience may be very useful in dealing with issues.
 +
|Deceit percentage=50
 +
|Deceit text=While our aging leadership does seem somewhat out of touch. younger leaders throughout the world are also experiencing difficulties.
 +
|Deceit intended=no
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=40
 +
|Motivation=Younger politicians may make this claim to gain an electoral advantage. even if it is not 100% true.
 +
|Motivation percentage=75
 +
|Motivation text=This is a sound tactic. since the media are quick to pounce on any evidence of an older politician being out of step or not "getting" some current trend.
 +
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=55
 +
|Social acceptability text=If this claim makes older politicians more aware of age-related issues that could possibly be influencing them. then the claim is acceptable. even though it may not be 100% true.
 +
|Label=This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.
 +
|Label percentage=70
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:20, 9 November 2022

Not permitted