(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Workflow | {{Workflow | ||
|Plaintiff verdict=No | |Plaintiff verdict=No | ||
| − | |Stage= | + | |Stage=Needs judge |
|Filed by=User:Isophist | |Filed by=User:Isophist | ||
|Case ID=AfeGgbGidBafEggBgiDb | |Case ID=AfeGgbGidBafEggBgiDb | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
1) Wharton doesn't explicitly reference trans women athletes in his tweet (although they are prominent in his published LA Times article); 2) Wharton's article attempts to present both sides - it is not "a direct attack on trans women and an insult to all women."; 3) There are separate men's and women's sporting competitions because men and women are physically different and in many sports male size, muscle mass and strength are advantageous. This is not valuing male athletic achievement over female athletic achievement but recognizing the physical factors that contribute to athletic performance, which in many instances give men and advantage over women in heads-to-head competition. To explicitly discuss these differences is not transphobic, in my opinion. One can support transgender identity and equal protection under the law on the one hand, but not necessarily support transgender athletes as "equivalent" when it comes to athletic competition. | 1) Wharton doesn't explicitly reference trans women athletes in his tweet (although they are prominent in his published LA Times article); 2) Wharton's article attempts to present both sides - it is not "a direct attack on trans women and an insult to all women."; 3) There are separate men's and women's sporting competitions because men and women are physically different and in many sports male size, muscle mass and strength are advantageous. This is not valuing male athletic achievement over female athletic achievement but recognizing the physical factors that contribute to athletic performance, which in many instances give men and advantage over women in heads-to-head competition. To explicitly discuss these differences is not transphobic, in my opinion. One can support transgender identity and equal protection under the law on the one hand, but not necessarily support transgender athletes as "equivalent" when it comes to athletic competition. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Locations=https://twitter.com/solomongeorgio/status/1538982308794859520 | |Locations=https://twitter.com/solomongeorgio/status/1538982308794859520 | ||
|Markup="Both sides my ass. <b>This is a direct attack on trans women and an insult to all women. It is indirectly saying that trans women are men and men are better athletes than women.</b> <b>There is a right and wrong side to this debate</b> and it’s not the transphobic one." | |Markup="Both sides my ass. <b>This is a direct attack on trans women and an insult to all women. It is indirectly saying that trans women are men and men are better athletes than women.</b> <b>There is a right and wrong side to this debate</b> and it’s not the transphobic one." | ||
|uuid=33b1006e-0a37-461c-8723-f547c320fa06 | |uuid=33b1006e-0a37-461c-8723-f547c320fa06 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 16:25, 13 July 2022
Debating transgender athletics is not transphobic
Debating transgender athletics is not transphobic
Case is proposed
Waiting for Plaintiff verdict
Case is waiting for approval
Case needs a judge
Judge accepted
Case is filed
Case needs jurors
Suit in progress
Settled
Case ID
AfeGgbGidBafEggBgiDb
Lie title
Debating transgender athletics is not transphobic
Status
Needs judge
Invited judge
Please log in first.
Number of Jurors needed
Please log in first.
Number of Jurors accepted invite
0
Accepted Jurors
Invited Jurors
Please log in first.
Plaintiff
User:Isophist
