Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc/4"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Judge
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/164
 
|Case ID=AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc
 
|Case ID=AfeEgbAha3afEegBahAc
|Workflow=Workflow/164
 
 
|User=User:Justin
 
|User=User:Justin
|Role=Judge
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/1655913312
+
|Truth percentage=85
 +
|Truth text=There may have been a momentary and small effect on inflation, but economic stimulus is not the underlying reason.
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=85
 +
|Whole truth text=The whole truth would include a discussion about supply side causes. climate change. and resource depletion.
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
 +
|Nothing But the truth text=To adopt this reasoning is to ignore the root causes. No one truly understands macroeconomics; it's more art than science
 +
|Deceit=The deceit is that the Covid stimulus payments by the US government is causing inflation in America.
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=-
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=60
 +
|Deceit intended text=The claim is . to a small extent. based in ignorance. but to a larger extent is being made intentionally to deceive the public.
 +
|Motivation=To deflect attention away from the root causes--climate change and resource depletion.
 +
|Motivation percentage=90
 +
|Motivation text=I think there are many many factors but agree that climate change and resource depletion are inflation causes
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=100
 +
|Social acceptability text=We can't solve problems if they are not honestly articulated.
 +
|Label=This does not discuss other factors that could be more important.
 +
|Label percentage=100
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 16:12, 22 June 2022

Not permitted