Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfeDfiAjb9afEdf9ajBi/3"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|User=User:Isophist | |User=User:Isophist | ||
|Truth=no | |Truth=no | ||
− | |Truth percentage= | + | |Truth percentage=75 |
− | |Truth text= | + | |Truth text=Unless the rationale for the criteria are clearly explained it is difficult to understand how such a decision to keep an oil company on an ESG list but drop an EV car maker. |
|Whole truth=no | |Whole truth=no | ||
− | |Whole truth percentage= | + | |Whole truth percentage=90 |
− | |Whole truth text= | + | |Whole truth text=Depends on the context. The truth according to S&P or the "real" truth? |
|Nothing But the truth=no | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100 | |Nothing But the truth percentage=100 | ||
|Nothing But the truth text=- | |Nothing But the truth text=- | ||
− | |Deceit=That | + | |Deceit=That sustainability is a clearly defined idea with broad agreement. Without that clarity it is easy to state that Exxon's actions are more sustainable than Tesla's. |
|Deceit percentage=100 | |Deceit percentage=100 | ||
− | |Deceit text= | + | |Deceit text= |
|Deceit intended=yes | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Motivation=Helping big oil companies | |Motivation=Helping big oil companies | ||
− | |Motivation percentage= | + | |Motivation percentage=95 |
|Motivation text=- | |Motivation text=- | ||
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable |
Latest revision as of 16:14, 8 June 2022
Not permitted