Difference between revisions of "Verdict:Afd9jgGdbHafDijGgdBh/6"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
+ | |Role=Judge | ||
+ | |Workflow=Workflow/126 | ||
|Case ID=Afd9jgGdbHafDijGgdBh | |Case ID=Afd9jgGdbHafDijGgdBh | ||
− | |||
|User=User:Frank | |User=User:Frank | ||
− | | | + | |Truth=no |
− | | | + | |Truth percentage=99 |
+ | |Truth text=- | ||
+ | |Whole truth=no | ||
+ | |Whole truth percentage=99 | ||
+ | |Whole truth text=- | ||
+ | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
+ | |Nothing But the truth percentage=99 | ||
+ | |Nothing But the truth text=- | ||
+ | |Deceit=Blackburn stated that Judge Jackson Brown advocated the use critical theory in making judicial decisions | ||
+ | |Deceit percentage=100 | ||
+ | |Deceit text=- | ||
+ | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
+ | |Deceit intended percentage=100 | ||
+ | |Motivation=Discredit Judge Jackson Brown for the Supreme Court and make points with the conservative political base | ||
+ | |Motivation percentage=100 | ||
+ | |Motivation text=- | ||
+ | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
+ | |Social acceptability percentage=100 | ||
+ | |Social acceptability text=- | ||
+ | |Label=How to take out of context a nominee's past speech to make political points | ||
+ | |Label percentage=95 | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 4 April 2022
Not permitted