Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/3"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Juror
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/187
 
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
 
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|Workflow=Workflow/187
 
 
|User=User:Bas
 
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/1668618474
+
|Truth percentage=75
 +
|Truth text=The researchers assume that all life forms are carbon-based and subject to the natural selection process, which relies on continuous competition.
 +
 
 +
And I find it hard to believe we know how civilization would be destroyed without us ever having seen a civilization being destroyed. There are probably so many reasons, it more looks like just some guesses.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=80
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Deceit=That we have any clue what actually happens. These are some guesses
 +
|Deceit percentage=95
 +
|Deceit text=
 +
|Deceit intended=no
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=55
 +
|Deceit intended text=They want to help the world further but actually, I would think it are some guesses.
 +
|Motivation=The motivation is unintentional. Scientists believe that they are advancing knowledge.
 +
|Motivation percentage=95
 +
|Motivation text=-
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=65
 +
|Social acceptability text=It isn't good to suggest this as being good science
 +
|Label=This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.
 +
|Label percentage=100
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:17, 16 November 2022

Not permitted