Difference between revisions of "Verdict:Aff6giHjc6af6fg9hj3f/2"
From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm) |
(Edited with WSForm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verdict | {{Verdict | ||
| − | |||
|Role=Plaintiff | |Role=Plaintiff | ||
| + | |Workflow=Workflow/185 | ||
|Case ID=Aff6giHjc6af6fg9hj3f | |Case ID=Aff6giHjc6af6fg9hj3f | ||
| − | | | + | |User=User:Admin |
| + | |Truth=yes | ||
| + | |Truth percentage=84 | ||
| + | |Truth text=Companies don't have the same incentives to invest in new technology because the standard is mandatory and everyone uses it. | ||
| + | |Whole truth=no | ||
| + | |Whole truth percentage=95 | ||
| + | |Whole truth text=It is important to note that maybe innovation isn't always the most important. By switching to usb-c people will need fewer cables and will have fewer cables to throw away. Besides, you won't have to carry around a bunch of cables anymore. | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth=no | ||
| + | |Nothing But the truth percentage=85 | ||
| + | |Deceit=That innovation is the most important thing in this discussion | ||
| + | |Deceit percentage=55 | ||
| + | |Deceit text= | ||
| + | |Deceit intended=yes | ||
| + | |Deceit intended percentage=60 | ||
| + | |Deceit intended text=They should know that the reason for the EU to make USB-c mandatory are good for the short term. | ||
| + | |Motivation=So they can keep using the lightning connector for their own ecosystem of devices wich makes them more money. | ||
| + | |Motivation percentage=85 | ||
| + | |Motivation text= | ||
| + | |Social acceptability=Unacceptable | ||
| + | |Social acceptability percentage=55 | ||
| + | |Social acceptability text=It would be nice if they had the consumer at first instead of themselves | ||
| + | |Label=Apple puts money first customers second | ||
| + | |Label percentage=85 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:38, 26 October 2022
Not permitted
