Difference between revisions of "Verdict:AfeDfiAjb9afEdf9ajBi/5"

Latest revision as of 16:18, 8 June 2022

Not permitted

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Verdict
+|Role=Judge
+|Workflow=Workflow/160
 |Case ID=AfeDfiAjb9afEdf9ajBi
-|Workflow=Workflow/160
 |User=User:Frank
-|Role=Judge
+|Truth=no
-|Participant=Participant/1654702754
+|Truth percentage=85
+|Truth text=The rules have been followed and there is reasoning behind the choice. But when looking at it from the big picture it just doesn't make sense that a big oil company is in this list and Tesla isn't. Tesla revolutionized the removal of gas/oil burning for automobiles, which makes this a lie.
+|Whole truth=no
+|Whole truth percentage=100
+|Whole truth text=There are lies and truths mixed together
+|Nothing But the truth=no
+|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
+|Nothing But the truth text=-
+|Deceit=That Exxon is doing a good job while they knew about climate change 40 years ago and haven't done enough about it. Exxon makes their business out of the sale of polluting chemicals. Mostly burned.
+|Deceit percentage=100
+|Deceit text=-
+|Deceit intended=yes
+|Deceit intended percentage=60
+|Deceit intended text=You would think they can reason that this doesn't make sense at all
+|Motivation=Somebody is not properly evaluating Tesla's contribution. To give a better impression of Big Oil than it deserves.
+|Motivation percentage=100
+|Motivation text=-
+|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
+|Social acceptability percentage=100
+|Social acceptability text=it is pushing the world deeper and deeper in the climate change problem because a few people want to make more money
+|Label=This is an unfair list. Tesla was removed which makes no sense for their continuing contribution.
+|Label percentage=100
 }}