Difference between revisions of "Verdict:UlvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC/3"

From cm2.liecourt.com
(Edited with WSForm)
 
(Edited with WSForm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Verdict
 
{{Verdict
 +
|Role=Plaintiff
 +
|Workflow=Workflow/34
 
|Case ID=ulvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC
 
|Case ID=ulvOHuGE-DLYcnwfV-MIGZowDC
|Workflow=Workflow/34
 
 
|User=User:Admin
 
|User=User:Admin
|Role=Plaintiff
+
|Truth=no
|Participant=Participant/70
+
|Truth percentage=100
 +
|Truth text=The anti-vax group didn't tell the real of the interview
 +
|Whole truth=no
 +
|Whole truth percentage=100
 +
|Nothing But the truth=no
 +
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
 +
|Deceit=They tried to let Naomi Rogers think it was for an open interview but the real film was to support anti vax.
 +
 
 +
They didn't give clear answers when she asked for more information about the other people being interviewd.
 +
|Deceit percentage=100
 +
|Deceit text=
 +
|Deceit intended=yes
 +
|Deceit intended percentage=100
 +
|Deceit intended text=They intentionally didn't tell the truth when Naomi Rogers asked for more information about the other people being intevriewd.
 +
|Motivation=Letting people think that Naomi Rogers is an anti-vax person.
 +
|Motivation percentage=80
 +
|Motivation text=
 +
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
 +
|Social acceptability percentage=100
 +
|Social acceptability text=It is unacceptable to change the view of experts to conform with your own point of view. It is meant to misslead the people that watch it.
 +
|Label=Anti vax lie
 +
|Label percentage=50
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:47, 19 July 2021

Not permitted