<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cm2.liecourt.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Workflow%2F107</id>
	<title>Workflow/107 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cm2.liecourt.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Workflow%2F107"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cm2.liecourt.com/index.php?title=Workflow/107&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-10T03:25:07Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cm2.liecourt.com/index.php?title=Workflow/107&amp;diff=2762&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Rht5: Edited with WSForm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cm2.liecourt.com/index.php?title=Workflow/107&amp;diff=2762&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2022-01-19T15:48:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edited with WSForm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Workflow&lt;br /&gt;
|Plaintiff verdict=No&lt;br /&gt;
|Stage=Waiting for Plaintiff verdict&lt;br /&gt;
|Filed by=User:Rht5&lt;br /&gt;
|Case ID=AfdBfj6dc6afDbf0fd3f&lt;br /&gt;
|Lie=Ornstein Filibuster Lie 2&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic=Myths are Lies&lt;br /&gt;
|Accusation=The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'&lt;br /&gt;
Filibuster proponents often argue that the Constitution’s framers intended to &lt;br /&gt;
obstruct decisions by simple majorities. In defense of the filibuster, Lewis &amp;amp; Clark Law School professor &lt;br /&gt;
James Huffman wrote in the Hill that James Madison “would likely think it a brilliant innovation for &lt;br /&gt;
preventing majority tyranny.” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) wrote in the New York &lt;br /&gt;
Times in 2019 that the filibuster is “central to the order the Constitution sets forth,” citing Madison’s view &lt;br /&gt;
that the Senate ought to function as an “additional impediment” and a “complicated check” on the House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ornstein says this is a lie.  McConnell is lying.&lt;br /&gt;
But other than the explicit constitutional requirements for supermajorities, &lt;br /&gt;
such as to approve treaties, the framers were foursquare for majority votes. &lt;br /&gt;
Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 22 that allowing minorities to overrule &lt;br /&gt;
the majority would cause “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible &lt;br /&gt;
compromises of the public good.” Congressional Research Service scholar Walter J. Oleszek has noted:&lt;br /&gt;
 “Overall, the Framers generally favored decision-making by simple majority vote. &lt;br /&gt;
This view is buttressed by the grant of a vote to the Vice President (Article I, section 3) in &lt;br /&gt;
those cases where the Senators are ‘equally divided.’” &lt;br /&gt;
This provision makes clear that the Constitution’s drafters expected&lt;br /&gt;
 that most decisions would be made by majority vote.&lt;br /&gt;
|Locations=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/five-myths/five-myths-about-the-filibuster/2022/01/07/7c374788-6e4d-11ec-b9fc-b394d592a7a6_story.html&lt;br /&gt;
|Slot=2022-1-19/10:30 - 10:45 AM&lt;br /&gt;
|Markup=&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;The framers feared 'the tyranny of the majority.'&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|uuid=d492bfa9-ca50-4baa-88d0-7bb053d1bb96&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rht5</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>