Verdict:ScrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv/2 - Revision history

Rhtcmu: Edited with WSForm

2021-05-17T14:09:10Z

Edited with WSForm

2021-05-17T12:19:08Z

Edited with WSForm

2021-05-17T12:17:24Z

Edited with WSForm

2021-05-17T12:08:40Z

Edited with WSForm

New page

{{Verdict
|User=User:Rhtcmu
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=scrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv
|Workflow=Workflow/19
}}

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 |Social acceptability percentage=100
 |Social acceptability text=This is an incredibly destructive example because it assumes that people did not read the actual evidence brought to the lie or make it matter that Biden did not actually win.
 |Label percentage=80
 }}

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 |Whole truth text=There may be other situations where Biden won which also had complaints.  It would be be interesting to see these.
 |Nothing But the truth=yes
 |Nothing But the truth text=The evidence shows a claim which is a mixture of truth and lies.   In particular the 'witnesses' may have filed affidavits (true), but they may not observed what they thought they observed.
 |Deceit=To make people believe that ballot-stuffing was rampant in the Presidential Election in Georgia 2020.
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 |Social acceptability percentage=100
 |Social acceptability text=This is an incredibly destructive example because it assumes that people did not read the actual evidence brought to the lie or make it matter that Biden did not actually win.
 |Label percentage=80
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Verdict
 |Role=Plaintiff
 |Case ID=scrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv
-|Workflow=Workflow/19
+|User=User:Rhtcmu
 }}