View source for Workflow/160

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Judge accepted
|Filed by=User:Admin
|Case ID=AfeDfiAjb9afEdf9ajBi
|Lie=S&P 500 ESG describes Exxon as being more sustainable as Tesla
|Accusation=It just isn't the whole truth, one makes electric vehicles and the other produces oil 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/
They knew about climate change 40 years ago 

https://www.vox.com/22429551/climate-change-crisis-exxonmobil-harvard-study
our objective is to wrap yourself in the good phrases while sticking your opponents with the bad ones,” he wrote in 1986.

From the 1970s through the 1990s, most of the company’s PR efforts focused on casting doubt on the scientific consensus that burning fossil fuels was warming the planet. But by the mid-2000s, it was taking a more sophisticated, nuanced approach.

one of 20 companies responsible for one-third of energy-related global carbon emissions since 1965

The metrics and methods used are not reflecting logical thinking but weird rules.
|Locations=https://theconversation.com/how-a-sustainability-index-can-keep-exxon-but-drop-tesla-and-3-ways-to-fix-esg-ratings-to-meet-investors-expectations-183705
|Markup=<i>A major stock index that tracks sustainable investments </i><b>dropped electric vehicle-maker Tesla from its list in May 2022</b> – <b>but it kept oil giant ExxonMobil.</b>
|uuid=93c31e0f-667f-4e91-a7be-77721903452a
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Frank
}}