cm2.liecourt.com - User contributions [en]

Verdict:AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg/1

2022-10-05T16:21:46Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/181
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 1
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=-
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=-
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=That russia has annexed parts of Ukraine that they don't even hold anymore
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=97
|Deceit intended text=Definitely he wants to use these claims to rectify all the bad things he is doing and is going to do in the future. And make it more like it is going oke to the Rusion people
|Motivation=Trying to restore Russia to its former glory days. And because he is feeling like he had no other choice anymore. He is saying that the west has started the war, to recify his doing.
|Motivation percentage=75
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=the whole war is Unacceptable
|Label=Factual lie about Russia claiming land.
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg/1

2022-10-05T16:17:30Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|Workflow=Workflow/181
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Participant=Participant/1664986640
}}

Workflow/181

2022-10-05T16:17:22Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|Lie=Putin (anexing ukranine territory)
|Accusation=While Putin stated that russia has claimed Ukrainien territory for ever Ukrainian forces have already retaking parts of that claimed territory.

This makes Putins statement factually untrue, because if it would be seen as true claiming land would be as easy as saying: "I once held that territory so that means it will always be mine". That is just not how it works.

And besides this the referenda that have been taken haven't been fair for the ukrainien people.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/05/ukraine-hails-good-news-from-the-front-lines-with-major-gains-in-counteroffensives-.html
|Locations=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russias-putin-signs-law-annexing-four-ukrainian-regions-2022-10-05/
|Markup=There is no contradiction whatsoever. <b>They will be with Russia forever</b> <b>and they will be returned</b>
|uuid=01d89147-8b7f-4a16-8dab-c38ca8f847eb
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Rht5
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Armar, User:Frank, User:Isophist, User:Justin,User:Isophist
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1664986640

2022-10-05T16:17:21Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Workflow=Workflow/181
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
}}

Verdict:AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd/3

2022-09-28T16:14:38Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/180
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
|User=User:Merel3
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=It is possible to get hit by a coconut, but Did it happen ever?
|Whole truth=yes
|Whole truth percentage=50
|Whole truth text=Like they say: DO relax and enjoy. DON’T stress or rush and do not sit under a coconut filled tree if you are afraid of being hit by a coconut or always have bad luck.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=It mixes some truth and a lot of imagination.
|Deceit=Deceit is that this is something to worry about.
|Deceit percentage=80
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=80
|Deceit intended text=Whoever wrote this was just trying the get peoples attention to GET to Maui
|Motivation=Like the others. to sort of get you thinking about how Maui is different from where you came from.
|Motivation percentage=50
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=50
|Social acceptability text=IF it funny then it is acceptable.
|Label=Coconuts do fall from trees and they could hurt you but just look up to see if there are coconuts up there. and if so (which is rare). don't lay or stand directly below them or shake the tree
}}

Verdict:AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd/3

2022-09-28T16:08:27Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
|Workflow=Workflow/180
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1664381230
}}

Workflow/180

2022-09-28T16:07:13Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Rhtcmu
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
|Lie=Maui Lies
|Topic=Travel Lies
|Accusation=https://www.mauiaccommodations.com/blog/15-things-not-maui/

Travel Lies are lies about living in different locations you can travel
to. This Maui Accomodations Guide contains such lies warning about
things NOT to do on Maui.
15 Things NOT To Do on Maui

To quote,

THINGS YOU SHOULDN’T DO ON MAUI

things you shouldn't do on Maui: stand up paddlers on the ocean
Photo Courtesy of Garrett Hacking, PhotographyG.com

1. Don’t rent a stand up paddle (SUP) board and blithely head out to sea. . . unless you are experienced with SUP. Or unless you want to make an unscheduled ocean excursion to Tahiti. By yourself. On just that little board. SUP is loads of fun, but get some training before hitting the waves. You’ll enjoy it more if you learn how to do it right, and you’ll be much safer with a little instruction under your belt (or swimsuit). When it comes to ocean sports like SUP, ignorance is not bliss. Ignorance is dangerous.

SUP boards are very easy in certain parts of Maui. The warning is to use them only in very calm areas including mornings. Maui has both very calm beaches and very rough ones.

2. Don’t leave opened food containers out. We share our island paradise with multitudes of insects and other critters who, like us, thrive in Maui’s warm, tropical climate. Ants, cockroaches, spiders, centipedes, rodents . . . they live here, just as we do, and are simply a fact of life in the tropics. Most homes and visitor accommodations exterminate the premises on a regular basis to keep unwanted creatures under control. But don’t tempt fate by leaving any opened food in your car, room, or on your lanai. That leftover piece of pineapple pizza or bowl of taro chips and guacamole is like ringing a dinner bell for our creepy, crawly neighbors and yelling, “Come and get it!”

things you shouldn't do on Maui: "falling coconuts" warning sign

3. Don’t stand (or sit or park or picnic or nap) directly under a coconut tree loaded with coconuts. Youch. Definitely one of those things you shouldn’t do on Maui. One of those babies can unexpectedly fall and dent your head—or your car—inflicting some serious damage. There are not always signs around to warn you, so pay attention to what is hovering over your head.

things you shouldn't do on Maui: coconuts overhead in a tree

Factually, people getting hit by falling coconuts is less likely than getting mauled by a shark. Almost unheard of. The right precaution is to look at the trees and make sure they are 'prunned' of coconuts if you are concerned...also they fall very directly down so you have to be very close to the tree.

4. Don’t call local residents “Hawaiians.” Those of us who live in Hawaii call ourselves “locals.” A “Hawaiian” is a person who is actually of Native Hawaiian ethnicity. So, for instance, I am a local—I live here. But I am not a Hawaiian. My husband (who is of Native Hawaiian ancestry) IS a Hawaiian—and he’s a local, too. And definitely don’t refer to local residents (or Hawaiians) as “natives.” Yikes. That’s sure to make the locals wince.

Visitors can call anybody anything, nobody really cares. Maui lives for vacationeers.

5. Don’t honk. On Maui, we don’t honk our horn at other drivers, unless we REALLY REALLY REALLY need to get their attention. We might send a friendly “toot” to a pal in a passing car, but we don’t hooooonk at people unless cars or lives are in imminent danger. Honking is sure to get you some “stink eye” (or worse), so don’t honk at other drivers unless you seriously need to get their attention for safety reasons.

Maui is so small people usually travel about 40 MPH on the highways. There are only about 180,000 people living on Maui. People rarely honk and also rarely use their signals. Use Waze to avoid construction delays and such.

things you shouldn't do on maui: a Maui beach

6. Don’t smoke on Maui beaches. Over the years, our beautiful beaches had become virtual ashtrays, littered with thousands of cigarette butts. Smoking is now prohibited on most Maui beaches, punishable by a fine up to $500.

This is pretty dated. Smoking is prohibited in lots of places, beaches included.

7. Don’t turn your back on the ocean. Keep your eyes on the surf. An unexpected wave can knock you down while you’re coming out of the water or stopping to adjust your flippers, injuring you or pulling you into the sea. Pay attention to the ocean so you are not caught off-guard. It’s more powerful than you are. Trust me on that.

Turning your back on the ocean is risky if you are on a rough beach. These are obvious. (i.e., 15 foot waves!).

things you shouldn't do on Maui: shark

8. Don’t swim in murky waters. After heavy rains, stay out of the ocean until the water clears. Avoid swimming near the mouths of rivers or streams or in any murky or brown water areas. These waters attract predators (pictured), and you don’t want to be mistaken for a fish or turtle when this guy is looking for a snack. Other Maui Beach Tips.

Maui is has the four highest shark attacks after three places in Florida. The murky (salt) water as much as a early mornings in a evenings during dusk. The attacks however are rarely fatal.

9. Don’t leave your windows open while you’re gone. Any windows. Whether it’s your car or accommodations. Maui is blessed with tropical weather that can change from moment to moment. So if you run into the grocery store on a sunny day and leave your car windows down (or even worse, leave the top down on your convertible rental car), you could very well come back 10 minutes later and discover that there was a downpour while you were gone and you can now swim in your back seat.

This isn't bad advice but you really do know if you are just leaving the car for five or ten minutes. Generally, everybody drives with their air conditioning on in the day because it is usually about 80 all year around during the day. Convertibles and open windows are rare.

things you shouldn't do on Maui: a loco moco plate

10. Don’t be afraid of “local” food. Yes, we have McDonalds, Burger King, and Starbucks. But why visit Maui and eat the same food you can get at home? There is such a rich variety of food here: tropical fruits and vegetables fresh from the farm; fish caught that morning and on your plate at lunchtime; local fast food eateries, food trucks, mom-and-pop cafes, ethnic foods, and cutting-edge fine dining restaurants with acclaimed chefs. Be adventurous and try some local foods you’ve never tasted before! For dining suggestions, see my Top 20 Favorite Restaurants.

eat where you see middle class locals eating... Never a bad idea.

11. Don’t scuba dive in the morning then head to the top of Mount Haleakala that afternoon. If you are a diver, wait 24 hours after scuba diving before driving up to Haleakala or doing any other high-altitude activity like a helicopter tour or mountainside zip line. Decompression sickness (aka “the bends”) is not a memory you want to take home from your Maui trip.

This is true and the warning is given by the National Park for Haleakala. What isn't given is that you should realize that the drive up and down that mountain has lots of places where you can drive off the road to your death. Drive slow and pull to the designated side areas to let local traffic pass you. The road up and down is more crowded than you might expect because many people work at the observatories and there are lots of visitors year around...and one road.

12. Don’t skimp on the sunscreen, but please use ONLY reef-safe sunscreen. Just keep slathering on the high-SPF sunscreen throughout the day when exploring the island. Due to our proximity to the Equator, Maui’s tropical sun can burn you fast, even more so when you are near the water, and even on a cloudy overcast day. Nothing can ruin a vacation faster than a painful sunburn! However, if you plan on going into the ocean, please be aware that many sunscreens have ingredients that can irreparably harm the coral reefs.

The safe suncreen is remarkably ineffective. You almost cannot find any zinc oxide which doesn't work well anyway. If you bring some old style which works well, you can use it but not on areas exposed to the ocean water.

On January 1, 2021, a new law took effect in Hawaii prohibiting the sale or distribution of sunscreens that contain oxybenzone or octinoxate, two chemicals that have been proven harmful to the marine ecosystems. Hawaii is the first place in the world to ban sunscreens with these chemicals. If you brought sunscreen with you that contains those chemicals, please do not use it here. Instead, choose mineral sunscreens with titanium oxide or zinc oxide, as they are reef-friendly choices.

things you shouldn't do on Maui: monk seal on beach

13. Don’t try to pet a Hawaiian monk seal or ride on the back of a green sea turtle. These are two of the many endangered and threatened species in the Hawaiian islands, and they are protected from harm or harassment by very strict State and Federal laws. So if you are lucky enough to see these wild creatures, enjoy them from a distance, and “look, don’t touch.” This should top everyone’s list of things you shouldn’t do on Maui.

Seeing monk seals is not common at all. But you will see turtles.

And, speaking of wild ocean creatures, DON’T FEED THE FISH. It may sound charming to have a flurry of tropical fish gather ’round for a hand-feeding when you’re snorkeling, but remember this is not an animated Disney movie. There are dangers. First, it’s harmful to the fish and disrupts the natural environmental balance, even affecting the coral reefs, which rely on hungry fish to keep them from being choked by algae. And fish can become aggressive–you can lose a finger (or worse) in the process. Plus, you don’t want to be at the center of a feeding frenzy that draws the attention of the “big boys” (see shark photo above). Please don’t feed the fish.

Don't feed the fish is true. If you have to feed something there are lots of friendly birds that obviously make their living cleaning up after people.

14. Don’t call the continental U.S. “the states.” Hawaii IS one of the states. The 50th state, to be precise. In Hawaii, we refer to the continental U.S. states as “the mainland.” Never “the states.” So statements like “I just arrived from the states” or “They’re having bad weather back in the states” will earn you a look from locals.

This is true:

15. Be cautious about removing any natural items to take as souvenirs. Our island environment, both on land and in the sea, is precious and fragile. Please respect it. It is illegal to take sand (since 2013), dead coral, rocks and other “marine deposits” from the beach. The exceptions are driftwood, shells, beach glass, glass floats (pictured below), and seaweed. It is also illegal to take rocks or minerals from Haleakala National Park; and don’t even think about uprooting an endangered Haleakala Silversword plant to take home — they are protected by Federal law, and theft of a Silversword is a felony crime.

DO relax and enjoy. DON’T stress or rush. And check out my other Practical Do’s and Don’ts for Maui Visitors.

This is true: Book directly with owner/managers whenever you can. If something goes wrong they can help unless a broker was involved.

Looking for great places to stay on Maui? You’ll save by BOOKING DIRECTLY with the owners/managers of these accommodations.
Looking for Maui deals? Sign up here for our free monthly Maui Deals & Steals enewsletter with the latest book-direct deals from our advertisers.

Happy Travels!
|Locations=https://www.mauiaccommodations.com/blog/15-things-not-maui/
|Slot=2022-09-28/12:00 - 12:15 AM
|Markup=things you shouldn't do on Maui: <b>coconuts overhead in a tree</b>
|uuid=ed94858b-e529-4555-b6c0-a605d9ffd8c7
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Justin
|Juror amount=3
|Random juror=User:Isophist, User:Armar, User:Frank, User:Bas,
|Jurors=User:Frank, User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1664381230

2022-09-28T16:07:11Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/180
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
}}

Verdict:AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc/1

2022-09-07T16:10:33Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/179
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 4
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=95
|Truth text=The reports that amnesty and the guardian have made public state that the bad working environment causes a lot of the casualties. Hereby Ronald de Boer isn't a expert in this field and didn't give any real counter arguments and he is involved in the football so want to be more positive about this event because a lot of companys already boycot the World championship
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=75
|Whole truth text=-
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=75
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=I hope not. There are a lot of people.
|Deceit percentage=50
|Deceit text=how can a person be so ignorant of those bad working environment.
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=55
|Deceit intended text=Maybe they have talked into him into thinking like this but with all the information that is available about the subject he should now better.
|Motivation=He likes football and want this event to succeed. (and get some sponsorship ready)
|Motivation percentage=75
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=This can't be forgiven, a lot of people died or have worked in very very very bad working environment.
|Label=A unforgivable lie
|Label percentage=75
}}

Verdict:AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc/1

2022-09-07T16:09:23Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/179
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 4
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=95
|Truth text=The reports that amnesty and the guardian have made public state that the bad working environment causes a lot of the casualties. Hereby Ronald de Boer isn't a expert in this field and didn't give any real counter arguments and he is involved in the football so want to be more positive about this event because a lot of companys already boycot the World championship
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=75
|Whole truth text=-
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=75
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=I hope not. There are a lot of people.
|Deceit percentage=50
|Deceit text=how can a person be so ignorant of those bad working environment.
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=55
|Deceit intended text=Maybe they have tricked him into thinking like this but with all the information that is available about the subject he should now better.
|Motivation=He likes football and want this event to succeed. (and get some sponsorship ready)
|Motivation percentage=75
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=This can't be forgiven, a lot of people died or have worked in very very very bad working environment.
|Label=A unforgivable lie
|Label percentage=75
}}

Verdict:AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc/1

2022-09-07T16:02:29Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
|Workflow=Workflow/179
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 4
|Participant=Participant/1662566505
}}

Workflow/179

2022-09-07T16:01:48Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Admin
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
|Lie=Ronald de Boer as aambassader of Qatar lies about working conditions
|Accusation=The bad working conditions and high heat have caused a lot of working migrants to die a by Qatar so called "natural death". UN studies have found that the high temperatures and pour working conditions have a significant impact on the high death rate under migrant workers.

As a tv personal Ronald de Boer supports Qatar and says that the numbers in the news and in particular 6500 workers that died is taken out of context. And supports Qatar in their work around the World Cup preparations.
I believe it is a bad lie to support a dictatorship like Qatar in the harm they do to hard working immigrants.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/23/revealed-migrant-worker-deaths-qatar-fifa-world-cup-2022

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/08/qatar-failure-to-investigate-migrant-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/
|Locations=https://m.fcupdate.nl/ampartikel/?id=399916
|Markup=<i>he claimed that the 6,500 dead migrant workers were </i>"<b>taken out of context</b>. 
|uuid=8a6dc272-eecf-41a9-b9e1-8dfb67589682
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Frank
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:JohnDoe, User:CKoehler
|Jurors=User:Justin,User:Armar,User:Rht5, User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1662566505

2022-09-07T16:01:46Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 4
|Workflow=Workflow/179
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
}}

Verdict:AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj/1

2022-08-31T16:20:32Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/177
|Case ID=AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 1
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=74
|Truth text=We should make decisions about who and what we honor based on our own values, values that create a more equitable world for all. many factors ar involved
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=25
|Whole truth text=No. there is more to racism than eponymous names. but by continuing to use eponymous common bird names. we continue to reference and honor our distressful colonial heritage and the racism that was a direct consequence of this malicious exploitation.
it will not solve the problem, but like said: it is a step
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=30
|Nothing But the truth text=Bird Names For Birds—both the initiative and the actual bird names—will not end racism. It won’t even end all of the problems within the bird community. However, it is one step. It is one problem that the bird community can be self-aware of, acknowledge, and rectify.
|Deceit=While this statement is generally true. there is some deceit in making the claim that the world be more inclusive as a result. even though it is a step in the right direction.
|Deceit percentage=90
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=75
|Deceit intended text=I think the folks behind this initiative sincerely believe it. but they are minimizing other important factors.
|Motivation=To send a strong signal that a certain segment of the populace. i.e.. a large segment of the birding/ornithology community. strongly rejects our legacy of colonialism. racism. and cultural imperialism.
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=90
|Social acceptability text=It is acceptable to make this claim. even though it is not wholly accurate.
|Label=This is a claim that is believed to be true. but enacting it will nor result in the end of racism and colonialism. It is an incremental step . not a solution!
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj/1

2022-08-31T16:18:17Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/177
|Case ID=AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 1
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=74
|Truth text=We should make decisions about who and what we honor based on our own values, values that create a more equitable world for all. many factors
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=20
|Whole truth text=No. there is more to racism than eponymous names. but by continuing to use eponymous common bird names. we continue to reference and honor our distressful colonial heritage and the racism that was a direct consequence of this malicious exploitation.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=20
|Nothing But the truth text=Bird Names For Birds—both the initiative and the actual bird names—will not end racism. It won’t even end all of the problems within the bird community. However, it is one step. It is one problem that the bird community can be self-aware of, acknowledge, and rectify.
|Deceit=While this statement is generally true. there is some deceit in making the claim that the world be more inclusive as a result. even though it is a step in the right direction.
|Deceit percentage=90
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=75
|Deceit intended text=I think the folks behind this initiative sincerely believe it. but they are minimizing other important factors.
|Motivation=To send a strong signal that a certain segment of the populace. i.e.. a large segment of the birding/ornithology community. strongly rejects our legacy of colonialism. racism. and cultural imperialism.
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=90
|Social acceptability text=It is acceptable to make this claim. even though it is not wholly accurate.
|Label=This is a claim that is believed to be true. but enacting it will nor result in the end of racism and colonialism. It is an incremental step . not a solution!
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj/1

2022-08-31T16:10:58Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj
|Workflow=Workflow/177
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Participant=Participant/1661961911
}}

Workflow/177

2022-08-31T16:05:13Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj
|Lie=Bird Names for Birds
|Topic=Not a lie!
|Accusation=
The concern about eponymous and honorific common bird names is not new. But the movement to see these names changed is.

Eponyms (a person after whom a discovery, invention, place, etc., is named or thought to be named) and honorific common bird names (a name given to something in honor of a person) are problematic because they perpetuate colonialism and the racism associated with it. The names that these birds currently have—for example, Bachman’s Sparrow—represent and remember people (mainly white men) who often have objectively horrible pasts and do not uphold the morals and standards the bird community should memorialize.

The vast majority of eponymous common names were applied to birds by European and American naturalists during a period of time known as colonialism, when (primarily) European countries subjugated, exploited, and populated territories held by non-white peoples. To legitimize this endeavor, the concept of race as a classification system was developed, and the white “race” and civilization were considered superior to all others. The impacts of colonialism were global, and the false concept of race used to justify colonialism resulted in the reality of racism, a reality which has structured societies, interactions, and even survival ever since.

Eponymous common names are essentially verbal statues. They were made to honor the benefactor in perpetuity, and as such reflect the accomplishments and values that the creator esteemed. We are not bound by either the intention or the regard; we should make decisions about who and what we honor based on our own values, values that create a more equitable world for all. By continuing to use eponymous common bird names, we continue to reference and honor our distressful colonial heritage and the racism that was a direct consequence of this malicious exploitation. This is unacceptable, and we must do better.

Current events in 2020 renewed societal emphasis on social justice and have shown that the time to reevaluate is now, and are largely why this initiative formalized. We are overdue individually, as groups and communities, and as a society to reevaluate our biases, remove barriers of all kinds, and be better.

Bird Names For Birds—both the initiative and the actual bird names—will not end racism. It won’t even end all of the EDI problems within the bird community. However, it is one step. It is one problem that the bird community can be self-aware of, acknowledge, and rectify.
A growing movement to reexamine names bestowed on everything from college campuses to city streets has swelled to encompass birders, ornithologists, and conservationists. Doing away with honorifics, they say, and renaming birds for the qualities that make each special, could make the birding world more inclusive for those who have long been left out or pushed away. Once unthinkable, the scientific body that governs bird names is finally embarking on a process that could redefine not only what we call myriad birds but also birding itself.

About 150 of the roughly 2,000 North and Central American bird species have honorifics. Most were named for naturalists, such as Alexander Wilson, a chronicler of birdlife during the early 19th century and widely considered the father of American ornithology. The handful of names that commemorate women mostly use first names; Anna’s Hummingbird is a tribute to French courtier Anna Masséna, wife of an amateur ornithologist. While these figures don’t stir up much controversy, other species are saddled with heavier burdens.

Audubon’s Shearwater and Audubon’s Oriole honor renowned avian artist John James Audubon (also the namesake of this magazine), an enslaver who collected skulls from Texas battlefields during his travels. His contemporary John Kirk Townsend plundered Native American graves; his legacy lives on with Townsend’s Warbler and Townsend’s Solitaire. Scott’s Oriole carries a banner for General Winfield Scott, who willingly accepted a leading role in the genocide of Native Americans on the Trail of Tears.
|Locations=https://www.audubon.org/magazine/summer-2022/whats-bird-name
|Markup=Doing away with honorifics, they say, and renaming birds for the qualities that make each special, <i>could make the birding world more inclusive for those who have long been left out or pushed away. </i>
|uuid=19039ced-e285-43a8-84a9-4b9386d8e67b
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Rht5
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Bas, User:Isophist, User:Justin, User:Armar,User:Phapon
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1661961911

2022-08-31T16:05:12Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Workflow=Workflow/177
|Case ID=AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj
}}

Verdict:AffAbd6ih6af6abDfiHf/1

2022-08-24T16:36:56Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/176
|Case ID=AffAbd6ih6af6abDfiHf
|User=User:Merel3
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=if you narrate a book yourself or hire a narrator and get the raw audio files, you can put the book on audible (DRMed) and ALSO distribute DRM free, or use another DRM distributor/seller.
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=Audible places no restriction on the copyright owners to distribute any other way they want.
|Deceit=Amazon and Kindle do not disallow other publishing outlets.
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=100
|Deceit intended text=Doctorow is quite intelligent and can explain things well when he wants to. I think this was an intentional lie. and does not want his book on this platform but wants to sell his books.
|Motivation=The motivation was grevance about DRM and a DRM publisher.
|Motivation percentage=90
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=People will think that Amazon and Audible have somehow claimed copyright. which they have not. And it is not at all true. Audible players are FREE.
|Label=Mislead
|Label percentage=70
}}

Verdict:AffAbd6ih6af6abDfiHf/1

2022-08-24T16:13:33Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffAbd6ih6af6abDfiHf
|Workflow=Workflow/176
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1661357198
}}

Workflow/176

2022-08-24T16:06:40Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Judge accepted
|Filed by=User:Rhtcmu
|Case ID=AffAbd6ih6af6abDfiHf
|Lie=Cory Doctorow Amazon Lie
|Topic=Amazon Lie
|Accusation=https://doctorow.medium.com/what-is-chokepoint-capitalism-b885c4cb2719

This is an exchange from a short medium article by the
famous author Cory Doctrinow on his subject called Chokepoint
Capitalism. This is just a version of the evils of trusts and
monopolies.

This one is special because I thought a paragraph was a lie, I
wrote a response to his lie, Cory responded with why it was not a lie, and I
responded on why he was wrong, thus proving he was in fact,
intentionally lying.

Speaking of chokepoints…

The audiobook market is controlled by one company, Audible, a division of Amazon. In some genres, Audible has more than 90 percent of the market. If you’re an audiobook listener, you almost certainly have an Audible subscription, which means that anyone who wants to sell an audiobook needs to be on Audible.

But Audible has a rule: to sell in its marketplace, you have to let Audible wrap your audiobook in “Digital Rights Management” — an encryption scheme that can only be legally decrypted using the apps and devices that Audible has authorized.

That means that every dollar a listener spends on an audiobook is a dollar they’ll have to give up if they quit Audible, because there’s no (legal) way to convert Audible books so they’ll work on non-Audible players.

The more Audible dominates the audiobook market, the worse they treat creators. Professional narrators’ wages have been steadily squeezed, as have payments to the independent studios that produce audiobooks. The self-published audiobook creators who use Audible’s ACX platform report hundreds of millions of dollars in wage-theft.

Naturally, we won’t sell our audiobook with DRM, so naturally, it won’t be available on Audible.

Instead, we’re kickstarting pre-sales of the audiobook (along with print and ebooks). We’re currently at about $75,000, with 25 days to go. So far, our readers have pre-ordered about 1,500 DRM-free ebooks, 1,175 DRM-free audiobooks, and 650 hardcovers. They’ve also donated about 700 hardcover copies to libraries (if you work at a library and want to call dibs on one of those donated copies, fill in this form!).

This is the LIE:

That means that every dollar a listener spends on an audiobook is a dollar they’ll have to give up if they quit Audible, because there’s no (legal) way to convert Audible books so they’ll work on non-Audible players.

My comment to him:
I must be goofy but this is misleading, I think. For example, if you narrate a book yourself or hire a narrator and get the raw audio files, you can put the book on audible (DRMed) and ALSO distribute DRM free, or use another DRM distributor/seller. I don't recall an exclusive distribution provision by Audible of the performance content or a grant of copyright to them. Similarly for kindle.
That said, collecting pre-orders on non-DRMed material seems like a good idea if you can get the kickstarter community to want them. But once it's out without DRM, what exactly stops the pirates? At one time in history, the content providers did not have to worry about pirates, but then came bit-torrent (and others).
That said, you make a great argument about the failure of the government in its anti-trust responsibilities and the FTC/FCC in theirs. Under the US Constitution I believe it would be legal, and expected, to have a public enforcement agency for copyrighted and patented material. Big companies can afford their own enforcers, but not individuals or little guys. No such agency exists. The FBI LITERALLY LAUGHS IN YOUR FACE when you try to report the crime to them.

His comment back to me:
Cory Doctorow
Cory Doctorow

AUTHOR
about 20 hours ago

Yes, you can sell elsewhere, but how do you get your listeners non-DRM copies if you leave Audible and want to take them with you? Audible won't tell you who bought your book through its service, much less help you deliver MP3 versions to them so they can resign from Audible without losing your books.

My comment back to him, saying he is wrong:
Robert Thibadeau
Robert Thibadeau

YOU
about 5 hours ago

What Cory wants is the sales contact list from his reseller or a willingness of his reseller to sell the form of the release that he wants. As they say, "you can ask" but I've never seen any reseller agree to reselling something they don't want to resell.
I actually know the DRM that Audible uses (when I was designing the Self-Encrypting Drive technology for Seagate Technology). It is pretty sophisticated and contains many features that are very consumer oriented in terms of meta data markup associated with the Audible releases. Anybody who prepares an audible book for Audible can see some of this. i.e., Audible is adding content performance value with the DRM and they are in part a performance contributor of consumer value to what they are willing to sell. It's like a band performer saying he want to sing all his songs without a microphone to an audience of 10,000 people. The distributor (event producer) can say no.
Again, we need an enforcement division of the Gov. for Copyright and Patent Infringement. Copyright and Patent law already provides for protection but without any enforcers. This is like writing criminal law without any police or Justice Dept. That is what we have in Copyright and Patent Law.
Cory does not seem to want this. Probably because a lot of lawyers make their living as paid enforcers and do not care about writers and inventors who have no money to pay them their $400-1200/hr fees. And, Cory does not want to address this. Yet we do have law (National and Local) that DOES cover misdemeamor enforcement. What do you think police do? Let the CONGRESS correct this with a written responsiblity to the Dept. of Justice. As would be expected by any RIGHT that has supposedly been guaranteed and protected in the Constitution.
I would argue even further. That certain forms of DIVISIVE PERNICIOUS LYING even by Candidates for Office should be illegal and enforced under the Constitution. Slander is slander. We don't let certifiably insane people do anything they want to do. George Washington made exactly this point in his Farewell Address to us, before we had laws, just the Constitution. Read it here:
https://medium.com/liecatcher/hobgoblins-are-not-real-43d7a749067e

Cory's Bio:

Cory Doctorow (craphound.com) is a science fiction author, activist, and blogger. He has a podcast, a newsletter, a Twitter feed, a Mastodon feed, and a Tumblr feed. He was born in Canada, became a British citizen and now lives in Burbank, California. His latest nonfiction book is How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism. His latest novel for adults is Attack Surface. His latest short story collection is Radicalized. His latest picture book is Poesy the Monster Slayer. His latest YA novel is Pirate Cinema. His latest graphic novel is In Real Life. His forthcoming books include The Shakedown (with Rebecca Giblin), a book about artistic labor market and excessive buyer power; Red Team Blues, a noir thriller about cryptocurrency, corruption and money-laundering (Tor, 2023); and The Lost Cause, a utopian post-GND novel about truth and reconciliation with white nationalist militias (Tor, 2023).
|Locations=https://doctorow.medium.com/what-is-chokepoint-capitalism-b885c4cb2719
|Slot=2022-08-24/12:00 - 12:15 AM
|Markup=<font color="#ffffff"><span style="background-color: rgb(0, 101, 153);"><b>That means that every dollar a listener spends on an audiobook is a dollar they’ll have to give up if they quit Audible, because there’s no (legal) way to convert Audible books so they’ll work on non-Audible players.</b></span></font>
|uuid=1e1cc6a2-af1d-47c9-aac3-f9fa090f660b
|Random judge=done
|Random juror=User:Bas, User:Frank,
|Judge=User:Isophist
|Juror amount=2
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1661357198

2022-08-24T16:06:39Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Workflow=Workflow/176
|Case ID=AffAbd6ih6af6abDfiHf
}}

Verdict:AffAagAbiEaf6aaGab9e/4

2022-08-22T13:24:55Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/175
|Case ID=AffAagAbiEaf6aaGab9e
|User=User:Merel3
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=50
|Truth text=the way we are moving it sound like a truth but it looks like chaos
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=This subject is so enormously complex that it never will be the whole truth
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=This subject is so enormously complex that it never will be nothing but the truth
|Deceit=The people have so much distrust and own opinions, that they are not trying to fix problems anymore but want there truth
|Deceit percentage=
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=no
|Deceit intended percentage=60
|Deceit intended text=I do believe most of the people believe what they are saying. but their also definitely is a small group of people trying to anger everyone.
|Motivation=Everyone wants a better world. But the definition of better vary a lot between different groups.
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=What Balaji says needs to be spread more. we need to inform people to make them aware of what is going on. There needs to be a way for people to be less angry and for everyone to group up and start fixing problems and sometimes change their mind or accept what others think. otherwise we could end up in one big mess
|Label=It is Turning into a mess
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffAagAbiEaf6aaGab9e/4

2022-08-22T13:20:07Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffAagAbiEaf6aaGab9e
|Workflow=Workflow/175
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1661174363
}}

Workflow/175

2022-08-22T13:19:25Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Admin
|Case ID=AffAagAbiEaf6aaGab9e
|Lie=Heading towards total anarchy
|Accusation=On the Tim Ferris show podcast Balaji made the following statement:
far Left and far right agree that institutions with power are terrible.

His prediction is that we are moving towards a anarchy where police gets defunded and government has less control
|Locations=https://open.spotify.com/episode/6eRkkusvlcrW4SjAKe1cef?si=uF-EMIDKS4qUdjR-pgHrlQ
|Markup=far Left and far right agree that institutions with power are terrible. <div><br></div><div>His prediction is that we are moving towards a anarchy where police gets defunded and government has less control </div><div><br></div><div>https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1463461949702766598?lang=en</div><div><br></div><div>https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/the-witching-hour-approaches</div>
|uuid=63f43530-2e85-45b9-a759-b54d06f05945
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Isophist
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Rht5, User:Drlove, User:E Rosalie,
|Jurors=User:Frank,User:Justin, User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1661174363

2022-08-22T13:19:24Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/175
|Case ID=AffAagAbiEaf6aaGab9e
}}

Verdict:Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe/5

2022-08-15T13:20:29Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/173
|Case ID=Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe
|User=User:Merel3
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=70
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=75
|Whole truth text=It is a very interesting concept but stating that it will tackle all issues and be the future of cities is not very likely
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=60
|Nothing But the truth text=they want it to be true
|Deceit=That this vision will change the whole world
|Deceit percentage=80
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=90
|Deceit intended text=It definitely is used as a pr stunt for the region/country
|Motivation=Getting a better image because at this moment they are one of the main oil producers of the world and have issues with human rights
|Motivation percentage=95
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=70
|Social acceptability text=first fix other issues before you try to solve the challenges facing humanity in urban life
|Label=Future vision concept being overestimated
|Label percentage=75
}}

Verdict:Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe/5

2022-08-15T13:13:06Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe
|Workflow=Workflow/173
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1660569164
}}

Workflow/173

2022-08-15T13:12:47Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Admin
|Case ID=Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe
|Lie=The line is a future utopia, but are people going to live there
|Topic=To good to be true
|Accusation=In 2021, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman revealed the country's plans to build The Line, a smart linear city that will be constructed vertically, have no roads or cars and run purely on renewable energy. Now, the Saudi government has released image renders of what The Line could look like once it's done. The city was designed to only be 200 meters (656 feet) wide, but 500 meters (1,640 feet) tall and 170 kilometers (105 miles) long. It will house multiple communities encased in a glass facade running along the coast and will eventually be able to accommodate up to 9 million residents.

A dutch design specialist says: "it won't be likely people in modern cities of this day and age will accept a big change like this and move into cities simaler to this futuristic concept"
|Locations=https://www.engadget.com/the-line-neom-saudi-images-134030730.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFy8RpREHO8CEdiSCP7X2WFnvhcIYYumqZiEiqkANzs_JW5WwvvoujRfby0-SKfvRFZqutE3uZ3Xw0cW7FcHGpVAiEZdOH2Tfh-hwyyQrza-Z5jVJo4uCaiDDsNWOKfKrAK0HFSNGm8V_AT7knZCbXnnGk10rFx494qrb9IE_eW1
|Markup=<b>THE LINE will tackle the challenges facing humanity in urban life today </b><i>and will shine a light on alternative ways to live.</i>
|uuid=784ceabe-90bb-4fcb-aa14-9a44d1e4e914
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Frank
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Rht5, User:NikPeachey, User:DSmitty12,
|Jurors=User:Justin,User:Isophist, User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1660569164

2022-08-15T13:12:45Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/173
|Case ID=Aff0efDieEaf6je6diEe
}}

Verdict:AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg/3

2022-06-20T13:25:57Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/165
|Case ID=AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 2
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=-
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=-
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=The deceit is that he is telling the historical truth.
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=50
|Deceit intended text=There is so much info that is the truth, this is eadily to check, and he didn't.
|Motivation=be more read on medium by writing some popular subjects.
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=80
|Social acceptability text=People may well believe this guy's lies.
|Label=Historically and Currently Untrue
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg/3

2022-06-20T13:21:17Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg
|Workflow=Workflow/165
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Participant=Participant/1655731254
}}

Workflow/165

2022-06-20T13:20:56Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Judge accepted
|Filed by=User:Rht5
|Case ID=AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg
|Lie=Russian Inferred Causation Lies
|Topic=Inferred Causation Lies
|Accusation=his article is absolutely packed with one after another unsupported
causation lies. It is a great example of propoganda that sounds like
history but the actual facts are not supported. In the first few sentences:
150 million people have left Russia since the 1990’s, and one-third of its area has been clipped off its map.

These people did not jump over a border wall — they formed their own countries and seceded.

One by one, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Latvia, Moldova, Tajikstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and (drum roll) Ukraine,
decided that they were not Russians after all. With these
150 million people went 2.6-million square miles of land (5-million sq. kms).

As the war goes on in Ukraine, highlighting the
incapacity of the Russian army,
there are signs that other territories are looking for their moment.
The disintegration of Russia has not stopped.

Far from uniting Russia, Putin’s war is driving it further apart.

At its core stands an impossible notion of Russia —
one that only an army of occupation could pave over.

Russia’s inability to form a nation is in fact long-seeded.
After WWI Large chunks of the empire broke off and established
independent nation-states: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Finland,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine.

As Stalin’s power grew, only those around the Baltic Sea —
Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland — stayed out of Moscow’s
grasp; the rest were re-conquered.

This is all directly contradicted by an established historian, in the book
"Bloodlands" by Timothy Snyder (of Yale)
https://www.amazon.com/Bloodlands-Timothy-Snyder-audiobook/dp/B07JB4WQVF/r
|Locations=https://barry-gander.medium.com/russia-is-dissolving-half-of-its-population-and-one-third-of-its-land-are-g
|Slot=2022-6-20/9:00 - 9:15 AM
|Markup=<b>As Stalin’s power grew, only those around the Baltic Sea —
</b><div><b>Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland — stayed out of Moscow’s
</b></div><div><b>grasp; the rest were re-conquered.</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b><br></b></div>
|uuid=f13540c4-4d92-4294-8959-7300115ecfcf
|Random judge=done
|Juror amount=3
|Random juror=User:Isophist, User:Justin,
|Judge=User:Frank
|Jurors=User:Isophist, User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1655731254

2022-06-20T13:20:55Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Workflow=Workflow/165
|Case ID=AfeEgb9fgGafEegBifGg
}}

Verdict:AfeEabEge9afEeaBegEi/3

2022-06-13T13:25:13Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/162
|Case ID=AfeEabEge9afEeaBegEi
|User=User:Merel3
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=Not the truth but not provably not the truth
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth=yes
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=The deceit is a list of impossible things that are all character assasinations
|Deceit percentage=
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=100
|Motivation=Trump believes this will garnish support from his cultists
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=95
|Social acceptability text=It is so wrong it can trigger the "wrong" people
|Label=Wildly Implausable Character Assassination which is Factually Impossible.
}}

Verdict:AfeEabEge9afEeaBegEi/3

2022-06-13T13:21:17Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AfeEabEge9afEeaBegEi
|Workflow=Workflow/162
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1655126440
}}

Workflow/162

2022-06-13T13:20:43Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Rht5
|Case ID=AfeEabEge9afEeaBegEi
|Lie=Trump Lie Anon
|Topic=Ad Hominim
|Accusation=https://twitter.com/StandForBetter/status/1518732416315101186?s=20&t=0Gk5OvjsLnEwu1Q_nOX7fw

Numerous DIVISIVE LIES by Trump

- April 25, 2022 -
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the
United States of America

Melania and I would like to congratulate Elon Musk, who purchased Twitter this
morning. Elon understands the MAGA agenda of free speech, and while he will be
a tough competitor to Devin Nunes and our far superior TRUTH Social, we wish him
well. Many people say Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey conspired with the radical left
maniacs to silence me on his platform while allowing Jimmy Kimmel,
Rosie O'Donnell, and other menopausal women who hate our great followers to stay
on Twitter. This sad action encouraged Nancy Pelosi, AOC, and other crazy
Democrats to steal the election. This tragedy is why many people, including
Marjorie Taylor Greene, saw that Mike Pence was weak and sent text messages to
Mark Meadows asking me to declare martial law. Meadows never passed these
messages to me; otherwise, I would have taken Greene and others' advice and
suspended the fraudulent election. Instead, in 2024 we will Save America by
sending Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to the old folks' home where they can play
checkers and board games with AOC, the Unknown Resister clown, and other
radical Democrats who want to destroy our country.
|Locations=
|Meeting=https://twitter.com/StandForBetter/status/1518732416315101186?s=20&t=0Gk5OvjsLnEwu1Q_nOX7fw
|Markup=<b>Instead, in 2024 we will Save America by
</b><div><b>sending Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to the old folks' home where they can play
</b></div><div><b>checkers and board games with AOC, the Unknown Resister clown, and other
</b></div><div><b>radical Democrats who want to destroy our country.</b></div>
|uuid=a48af37c-6c2a-4163-accc-0b36e9f4ee98
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Isophist
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Bas, User:Frank, User:Justin,User:Rht7, User:Garrisonbrave
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1655126440

2022-06-13T13:20:41Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Workflow=Workflow/162
|Case ID=AfeEabEge9afEeaBegEi
}}

Workflow/103

2022-06-13T13:19:08Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Settled
|Filed by=User:Merel
|Case ID=AfdBafDecEafDba6de3e
|Lie=Testing a lie about the cold winter
|Topic=Environment
|Accusation=The girl said it was cold. But i looked at the temperature and it was like 26 degrees celsius. SO it was not cold
|Locations=weather.nl
|Meeting=no
|Slot=2022-1-14/5:00 - 5:15 PM
|Markup=<b>it was cold</b><div><font color="#ffffff"><b><br></b></font><div><b><i>The temperature was 26 degrees celsius</i></b></div></div>
|uuid=ff8b451e-e36a-41ec-93e6-b949d12dbd25
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Merel2
|Juror amount=5
|Change=yes
|Change seen by=None, User:Merel3
|Random juror=done
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Workflow/79

2022-06-13T13:19:07Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=Yes
|Stage=In progress
|Filed by=User:Merel
|Case ID=AfcEdb6faAaf3edBffAa
|Lie=Testing with Bas
|Accusation=Accusation with Evidence and more text because i need a very long sentence to see what happens if i save this one and not using an enter in this sentence.
|Locations=hoi.nl
|Markup=
|uuid=4532a138-5f6b-432b-b8cc-d41f2034c1e8
|Random judge=done
|Topic=
|Random juror=done
|Juror amount=1
|Meeting=
|Judge=User:Merel2
|Change=yes
|Change seen by=None, User:Merel3
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Verdict:Afe3iaBagDafEciAbaGd/3

2022-05-30T13:26:12Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/154
|Case ID=Afe3iaBagDafEciAbaGd
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 2
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=80
|Truth text=That is not the only cause.

|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=fundamentally. there are many causes for not getting sleep and these may be the actual causes
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=50
|Nothing But the truth text=it is true but you need to see it in a light that there are many causes
|Deceit=That sleep(and lack of it) is so simple
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=100
|Deceit intended text=He has written a whole book on it
|Motivation=Power as an expert and money
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=Because he is regarded as the top expert on sleep. this is not acceptable scaring of people and telling not the whole truth
|Label=A Correlation Does Not Imply Causation Lie
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:Afe3iaBagDafEciAbaGd/3

2022-05-30T13:21:48Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=Afe3iaBagDafEciAbaGd
|Workflow=Workflow/154
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Participant=Participant/1653916890
}}

Workflow/154

2022-05-30T13:21:32Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Rht5
|Case ID=Afe3iaBagDafEciAbaGd
|Lie=Sleep-Lies-Walker
|Topic=Correlation is Not Causation Lie
|Accusation=
The book How We Sleep by Matthew Walker
is filled with lies that imply causation for what
is only established correlation. As such a loss
of sleep is blamed on many things which can cause
a loss of sleep. As if the loss of sleep is always under
your control. Walker seems to believe that you can just
go to sleep whenever you are told to do it.

The intro shows the fallacy in his reasoning.
Ultimately, asking “Why do we sleep?” was the wrong question.
It implied there was a single function, one holy grail of a reason that
we slept, and we went in search of it. Theories ranged from
the logical (a time for conserving energy),
to the peculiar (an opportunity for eyeball oxygenation),
to the psychoanalytic (a non-conscious state in which we fulfill repressed wishes).
This book will reveal a very different truth: sleep is
infinitely more complex, profoundly more interesting,
and strikingly health-relevant. We sleep for a rich litany of functions,
plural—an abundant constellation of nighttime benefits that service both our brains and our bodies.
There does not seem to be one major organ within the body, or process within the brain,
that isn’t optimally enhanced by sleep (and detrimentally impaired when we don’t get enough).
That we receive such a bounty of health benefits each night should not

Walker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (p. 6). Scribner. Kindle Edition.
be surprising. After all, we are awake for two-thirds of our lives,
and we don’t just achieve one useful thing during that stretch of time.
We accomplish myriad undertakings that promote our own well-being and survival.
Why, then, would we expect sleep—and the twenty-five to thirty years,
on average, it takes from our lives—to offer one function only?
Through an explosion of discoveries over the past twenty years,
we have come to realize that evolution did not make a spectacular
blunder in conceiving of sleep. Sleep dispenses a multitude of
health-ensuring benefits, yours to pick up in repeat prescription
every twenty-four hours, should you choose. Within the brain,
sleep enriches a diversity of functions, including our ability
to learn, memorize, and make logical decisions and choices.
Benevolently servicing our psychological health, sleep recalibrates
our emotional brain circuits, allowing us to navigate next-day social and psychological

Walker, Matthew. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (pp. 6-7). Scribner. Kindle Edition.
Other questions that can draw out signs of insufficient sleep are:
If you didn’t set an alarm clock, would you sleep past that time?
(If so, you need more sleep than you are giving yourself.)
Do you find yourself at your computer screen reading and then rereading
(and perhaps rereading again) the same sentence?
(This is often a sign of a fatigued, under-slept brain.)
Do you sometimes forget what color the last few traffic lights were while driving?
(Simple distraction is often the cause, but a lack of sleep is another culprit.)

Correlation is Not Causation Lie
|Locations=https://www.amazon.com/Why-We-Sleep-Unlocking-Dreams-ebook/dp/B06ZZ1YGJ5/
|Slot=2022-5-30/9:15 - 9:30 AM
|Markup=<i>If you didn’t set an alarm clock, would you sleep past that time?
</i><div>(<b>If so, you need more sleep than you are giving yourself.</b>) </div>
|uuid=f5f4edd8-c0fc-4d6c-98cd-9c153eb0db1b
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Bas
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Frank, User:Jackysmith, User:Wasted, User:Truth Deliverer,
|Jurors=User:Justin, User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1653916890

2022-05-30T13:21:31Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Workflow=Workflow/154
|Case ID=Afe3iaBagDafEciAbaGd
}}

Verdict:Afd9fgGhbEafDifGghBe/1

2022-04-11T11:56:23Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/129
|Case ID=Afd9fgGhbEafDifGghBe
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 1
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=21
|Truth text=Is it the Truth?
|Whole truth=yes
|Whole truth percentage=15
|Whole truth text=Is it the Whole Truth?
|Nothing But the truth=yes
|Nothing But the truth percentage=55
|Nothing But the truth text=Is it Nothing But the Truth?
|Deceit=What is the Deceit?
|Deceit percentage=
|Deceit text=additional support whatis the deceit
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended text=Intended
|Motivation=Motivation
|Motivation percentage=
|Motivation text=support Motivation
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability text=Social Acceptability?
|Label=Label
|Label text=support for the label
}}

Verdict:Afd9fgGhbEafDifGghBe/1

2022-04-11T11:55:35Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=Afd9fgGhbEafDifGghBe
|Workflow=Workflow/129
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Participant=Participant/1649678095
}}

Workflow/129

2022-04-11T11:54:57Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=In progress
|Filed by=User:Merel
|Case ID=Afd9fgGhbEafDifGghBe
|Lie=Testing Build
|Topic=no lie
|Accusation=testing
more tekst below here

Do we see it?
|Locations=
|Markup=testing
|uuid=39b4799e-ce53-4000-bc43-96283a303219
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Merel2
|Juror amount=1
|Random juror=done
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Participant/1649678095

2022-04-11T11:54:56Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Merel3
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Workflow=Workflow/129
|Case ID=Afd9fgGhbEafDifGghBe
}}

Workflow/32

2022-04-08T07:51:16Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Settled
|Filed by=User:Merel
|Case ID=Afd6baGefGafDfbAge6g
|Lie=Test case for the rehearsal this afternoon
|Topic=no lies
|Accusation=Merel can repair the wiki, the wiki was broken
|Locations=www.google.nl
|Slot=2022-3-2/8:15 - 8:30 AM
|Markup=<i>Merel can repair the wiki</i><b>, the wiki was broken</b>
|uuid=399cdc15-35f8-4ede-9928-8be7ae6c37c1
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Merel2
|Juror amount=1
|Change=yes
|Change seen by=None, User:Merel3
|Random juror=done
|Jurors=User:Merel3
}}

Verdict:Afd9jgGdbHafDijGgdBh/3

2022-04-04T13:29:43Z

Merel3: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/126
|Case ID=Afd9jgGdbHafDijGgdBh
|User=User:Merel3
|Name=Juror 3
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=99
|Truth text=-
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=99
|Whole truth text=-
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=99
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=Blackburn stated that Judge Jackson Brown advocated the use critical theory in making judicial decisions
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=100
|Motivation=Discredit Judge Jackson Brown for the Supreme Court and make points with the conservative political base
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=-
|Label=How to take out of context a nominee's past speech to make political points
|Label percentage=90
}}