cm2.liecourt.com - User contributions [en]

Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/3

2022-11-16T17:17:54Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/187
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|User=User:Bas
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=75
|Truth text=The researchers assume that all life forms are carbon-based and subject to the natural selection process, which relies on continuous competition.

And I find it hard to believe we know how civilization would be destroyed without us ever having seen a civilization being destroyed. There are probably so many reasons, it more looks like just some guesses.

|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=80
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Deceit=That we have any clue what actually happens. These are some guesses
|Deceit percentage=95
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=no
|Deceit intended percentage=55
|Deceit intended text=They want to help the world further but actually, I would think it are some guesses.
|Motivation=The motivation is unintentional. Scientists believe that they are advancing knowledge.
|Motivation percentage=95
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=65
|Social acceptability text=It isn't good to suggest this as being good science
|Label=This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/3

2022-11-16T17:12:01Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|Workflow=Workflow/187
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1668618474
}}

Workflow/187

2022-11-16T17:07:57Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|Lie=Intelligent Life Is Self Destructive
|Topic=Scientific Lie
|Accusation=According to the probabilistic Drake Equation (see below), advanced intelligent life has probably developed many times in the universe. For example, if the odds of an advanced civilization developing on a habitable planet are one in a trillion, then at least 10 billion such civilizations should have occurred.

We are left with a quandary. To restate the Fermi Paradox, where are they? Why have we not encountered them?

Researchers at NASA's JPL have written a paper (in the peer review process) that states that such civilizations have most likely been "filtered" out, the result of five factors: 1) Diseases/pandemics; 2) Wars (probably nuclear); 3) Depletion of resources/self-induced climate change; 4) Natural catastrophe, i.e., astroids or volcanoes; 5) Destruction by rogue Artificial Intelligence.

The researchers call this phenomenon the Great Filter, and claim that the odds of surviving long enough to communicate with others are astonishingly small. What's more, given the vastness of the cosmos, even if a civilization did survive the Great Filter, the likelihood of an encounter between us and them practically nil.

Please refer to the articles and the researchers' paper, below:

1) https://www.huffpost.com/entry/great-filter-theory-intelligent-life-extinction-nasa_n_636fee4ce4b0ca9acf253784

2) https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1350/are-we-alone-in-the-universe-revisiting-the-drake-equation/

3) https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2210/2210.10582.pdf

4) Here is a discussion about the Drake Equation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

5) N =R∗ ×fp ×ne ×fl ×fi ×fc ×L. (1)

• N is the number of currently active, communicative civilizations in our galaxy.
• R∗ is the rate at which stars form in our galaxy.
• fp is the fraction of stars with planets.
• ne is the number of planets that can potentially host life, per star that has planets.
• fl is the fraction of the above that actually do develop life of any kind.
• fi is the fraction of the above that develop intelligent life.
• fc is the fraction of the above that develop the capacity for interstellar communication.
• L is the length of time that such communicative civilizations are active.

Note that “fraction of the above” means that all the previous conditions have been satisfied. For example, when we consider fc we assume that intelligent life has already developed.
|Locations=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/great-filter-theory-intelligent-life-extinction-nasa_n_636fee4ce4b0ca9acf253784
|Markup=All intelligent life has likely destroyed itself before reaching a sophisticated enough point in its evolution to support an encounter with our civilization.
|uuid=5df59af1-834b-4ee3-aa33-b77192896f9f
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Rht5
|Random juror=User:Armar, User:Rvnash, User:Tantalus1, User:Peterjensen,
|Juror amount=5
|Jurors=User:Justin, User:Bas
}}

Participant/1668618474

2022-11-16T17:07:56Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Workflow=Workflow/187
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
}}

Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/3

2022-11-09T17:18:21Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/186
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
|User=User:Bas
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=80
|Truth text=While this is not the only problem associated with our elderly leadership, and it is not relegated to only older politicians, it is one of major concern.
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=20
|Whole truth text=Other problems also exist. and claims like this can be counterproductive and create an environment that can discourage younger citizens's participation. The statement also ignores or minimizes the fact that experience gained with age may be very helpful.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=20
|Nothing But the truth text=Some younger politicians are also guilty of entrenched habits and have jobs that have become entitlements.
|Deceit=There may not be a deceit. but If there is one. it lies in discouraging a discussion of detrimental factors other than a possible constricted world-view. It also completely ignores the fact that age-related experience may be very useful in dealing with issues.
|Deceit percentage=50
|Deceit text=While our aging leadership does seem somewhat out of touch. younger leaders throughout the world are also experiencing difficulties.
|Deceit intended=no
|Deceit intended percentage=51
|Deceit intended text=There may be no deceit.
|Motivation=Almost everyone is seeing that a lot of things are going wrong. Everyone wants to try and fix them, but everyone has different opinions on how to fix these issues.
|Motivation percentage=75
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=55
|Social acceptability text=If this claim makes older politicians more aware of age-related issues that could possibly be influencing them. then the claim is acceptable. even though it may not be 100% true.
|Label=This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.
|Label percentage=70
}}

Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/3

2022-11-09T17:14:03Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
|Workflow=Workflow/186
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1668013794
}}

Workflow/186

2022-11-09T17:09:56Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
|Lie=Aging Leaders Hurt America
|Topic=Not a lie!
|Accusation=America’s leadership class is increasingly older, with many politicians seeking election well beyond the time that most retire. But what if the concern over a longtime politician’s age has less to do with fear that the candidate might die or become incapacitated — and more to do with whether trying to snag yet another term at an age when almost everyone else is retired is just plain arrogant and greedy?

Iowa’s Senator Chuck Grassley makes a good test of that question — a test that merits attention from elected officials across this geriatric-run country..

Unlike Senate colleagues such as California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, Grassley has never been trailed by reports that he’s losing his marbles. Unlike a whole slew of other senators — including much younger pols like 50-year-old New Mexico Democrat Ben Ray Luján, who suffered a stroke — he hasn’t missed significant chunks of time due to serious health issues. His ad touts his best-in-the-Senate attendance record.

And yet a poll published this week that has shocked political pros in the state suggests voters have serious qualms about Grassley’s age. The survey, by the veteran Iowa polling firm Selzer & Co., reported that Grassley was running only 3 points ahead of his Democratic challenger, Mike Franken. Iowa’s Republican governor, meanwhile, was leading her race by 17 points, according to the survey, conducted with the Des Moines Register.

Despite months of Grassley-the-pushup-pro messaging, some 60 percent of respondents, including more than a third of Republicans, told pollsters that they thought age was a concern.

The question that ought to occupy the minds of people like the incumbent president of the United States (who turns 80 this fall), his most likely 2024 challenger (now 76), the Democratic triumvirate atop the House of Representatives (82, 83 and 82) and maybe the entire Senate (the oldest in American history) is: What kind of concern? If nobody is challenging the notion that Grassley is physically and mentally up to the job, shouldn’t everything be fine?

Not for everybody.

From NYT:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/14/us/politics/youth-voters-midterms-polling.html

Alexandra Chadwick went to the polls in 2020 with the single goal of ousting Donald J. Trump. A 22-year-old first-time voter, she saw Joseph R. Biden Jr. as more of a safeguard than an inspiring political figure, someone who could stave off threats to abortion access, gun control and climate policy.

Two years later, as the Supreme Court has eroded federal protections on all three, Ms. Chadwick now sees President Biden and other Democratic leaders as lacking both the imagination and willpower to fight back. She points to a generational gap — one she once overlooked but now seems cavernous.

“How are you going to accurately lead your country if your mind is still stuck 50, 60 or 70 years ago?” Ms. Chadwick, a customer service representative in Rialto, Calif., said of the many septuagenarian leaders at the helm of her party. “It’s not the same, and people aren’t the same, and your old ideas aren’t going to work as well anymore.”
|Locations=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/10/21/voters-worried-chuck-grassley-age-00062805
|Markup=The problem of America’s gerontocracy is not one of infirm or senescent leadership, but one of an increasingly impenetrable elite with entrenched habits and jobs that are entitlements, who are surrounded by staff who shield them from the real world.
|uuid=38e7f993-9c00-4825-ae9b-1c91962f59d6
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Rht5
|Random juror=User:Armar, User:Justin,User:Enviro1, User:Doorjammer, User:Unkle Bluto
|Juror amount=5
|Jurors=User:Bas
}}

Participant/1668013794

2022-11-09T17:09:55Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Workflow=Workflow/186
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
}}

Workflow/181

2022-10-05T14:59:08Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs judge
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|Lie=Putin (anexing ukranine territory)
|Accusation=While Putin stated that russia has claimed Ukrainien territory for ever Ukrainian forces have already retaking parts of that claimed territory.

This makes Putins statement factually untrue, because if it would be seen as true claiming land would be as easy as saying: "I once held that territory so that means it will always be mine". That is just not how it works.

And besides this the referenda that have been taken haven't been fair for the ukrainien people.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/05/ukraine-hails-good-news-from-the-front-lines-with-major-gains-in-counteroffensives-.html
|Locations=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russias-putin-signs-law-annexing-four-ukrainian-regions-2022-10-05/
|Markup=There is no contradiction whatsoever. They will be with Russia forever and they will be returned
|uuid=01d89147-8b7f-4a16-8dab-c38ca8f847eb
}}

Verdict:AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg/2

2022-10-05T14:59:07Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Plaintiff
|Workflow=Workflow/181
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|User=User:Bas
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Deceit=That russia has annexed parts of Ukraine that they don't even hold anymore
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=96
|Deceit intended text=Definitely he wants to use these claims to rectify all the bad things he is doing and is going to do in the future.
|Motivation=Trying to restore russia to its former glory days. And because he is feeling like he had no other choice anymore
|Motivation percentage=67
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Label=Factual lie about russia claiming land.
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg/2

2022-10-05T14:55:33Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|Workflow=Workflow/181
}}

Participant/316

2022-10-05T14:55:32Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|Workflow=Workflow/181
}}

Workflow/181

2022-10-05T14:55:23Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Waiting for Plaintiff verdict
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|Lie=Putin (anexing ukranine territory)
|Accusation=While Putin stated that russia has claimed Ukrainien territory for ever Ukrainian forces have already retaking parts of that claimed territory.

This makes Putins statement factually untrue, because if it would be seen as true claiming land would be as easy as saying: "I once held that territory so that means it will always be mine". That is just not how it works.

And besides this the referenda that have been taken haven't been fair for the ukrainien people.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/05/ukraine-hails-good-news-from-the-front-lines-with-major-gains-in-counteroffensives-.html
|Locations=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russias-putin-signs-law-annexing-four-ukrainian-regions-2022-10-05/
|Markup=There is no contradiction whatsoever. They will be with Russia forever and they will be returned
|uuid=01d89147-8b7f-4a16-8dab-c38ca8f847eb
}}

Verdict:AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd/1

2022-09-28T16:35:33Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/180
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
|User=User:Bas
|Name=Juror 4
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=It is possible to get hit by a coconut, but it almost never has actually happened.
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=On Maui it is really not something to worry about as a practical matter. Worry about sharks or getting hit by a car.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=It mixes some truth and a lot of imagination.
|Deceit=Deceit is that this is something to worry about.
|Deceit percentage=80
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=no
|Deceit intended percentage=80
|Deceit intended text=Whoever wrote this was just telling a tall tale and probably didn't even know it. (Coconut trees are pruned for a reason you say).
|Motivation=Like the others. to sort of get you thinking about how Maui is different from where you came from.
|Motivation percentage=50
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=60
|Social acceptability text=A person utilising funny content that may not be fully true to earn some money and rank high on google.
|Label=Coconuts do fall from trees and they could hurt you but just look up to see if there are coconuts up there. and if so (which is rare). don't lay or stand directly below them and don't put a car directly under one which has coconuts on them (which is actually very hard to do. usually). Very very rare possibility. Sharks attacks are more likely. and even they are rare except in early morning or evening times (dusk) or muddy water.
}}

Verdict:AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd/1

2022-09-28T16:08:02Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
|Workflow=Workflow/180
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 4
|Participant=Participant/1664381270
}}

Workflow/180

2022-09-28T16:07:51Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=In progress
|Filed by=User:Rhtcmu
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
|Lie=Maui Lies
|Topic=Travel Lies
|Accusation=https://www.mauiaccommodations.com/blog/15-things-not-maui/

Travel Lies are lies about living in different locations you can travel
to. This Maui Accomodations Guide contains such lies warning about
things NOT to do on Maui.
15 Things NOT To Do on Maui

To quote,

THINGS YOU SHOULDN’T DO ON MAUI

things you shouldn't do on Maui: stand up paddlers on the ocean
Photo Courtesy of Garrett Hacking, PhotographyG.com

1. Don’t rent a stand up paddle (SUP) board and blithely head out to sea. . . unless you are experienced with SUP. Or unless you want to make an unscheduled ocean excursion to Tahiti. By yourself. On just that little board. SUP is loads of fun, but get some training before hitting the waves. You’ll enjoy it more if you learn how to do it right, and you’ll be much safer with a little instruction under your belt (or swimsuit). When it comes to ocean sports like SUP, ignorance is not bliss. Ignorance is dangerous.

SUP boards are very easy in certain parts of Maui. The warning is to use them only in very calm areas including mornings. Maui has both very calm beaches and very rough ones.

2. Don’t leave opened food containers out. We share our island paradise with multitudes of insects and other critters who, like us, thrive in Maui’s warm, tropical climate. Ants, cockroaches, spiders, centipedes, rodents . . . they live here, just as we do, and are simply a fact of life in the tropics. Most homes and visitor accommodations exterminate the premises on a regular basis to keep unwanted creatures under control. But don’t tempt fate by leaving any opened food in your car, room, or on your lanai. That leftover piece of pineapple pizza or bowl of taro chips and guacamole is like ringing a dinner bell for our creepy, crawly neighbors and yelling, “Come and get it!”

things you shouldn't do on Maui: "falling coconuts" warning sign

3. Don’t stand (or sit or park or picnic or nap) directly under a coconut tree loaded with coconuts. Youch. Definitely one of those things you shouldn’t do on Maui. One of those babies can unexpectedly fall and dent your head—or your car—inflicting some serious damage. There are not always signs around to warn you, so pay attention to what is hovering over your head.

things you shouldn't do on Maui: coconuts overhead in a tree

Factually, people getting hit by falling coconuts is less likely than getting mauled by a shark. Almost unheard of. The right precaution is to look at the trees and make sure they are 'prunned' of coconuts if you are concerned...also they fall very directly down so you have to be very close to the tree.

4. Don’t call local residents “Hawaiians.” Those of us who live in Hawaii call ourselves “locals.” A “Hawaiian” is a person who is actually of Native Hawaiian ethnicity. So, for instance, I am a local—I live here. But I am not a Hawaiian. My husband (who is of Native Hawaiian ancestry) IS a Hawaiian—and he’s a local, too. And definitely don’t refer to local residents (or Hawaiians) as “natives.” Yikes. That’s sure to make the locals wince.

Visitors can call anybody anything, nobody really cares. Maui lives for vacationeers.

5. Don’t honk. On Maui, we don’t honk our horn at other drivers, unless we REALLY REALLY REALLY need to get their attention. We might send a friendly “toot” to a pal in a passing car, but we don’t hooooonk at people unless cars or lives are in imminent danger. Honking is sure to get you some “stink eye” (or worse), so don’t honk at other drivers unless you seriously need to get their attention for safety reasons.

Maui is so small people usually travel about 40 MPH on the highways. There are only about 180,000 people living on Maui. People rarely honk and also rarely use their signals. Use Waze to avoid construction delays and such.

things you shouldn't do on maui: a Maui beach

6. Don’t smoke on Maui beaches. Over the years, our beautiful beaches had become virtual ashtrays, littered with thousands of cigarette butts. Smoking is now prohibited on most Maui beaches, punishable by a fine up to $500.

This is pretty dated. Smoking is prohibited in lots of places, beaches included.

7. Don’t turn your back on the ocean. Keep your eyes on the surf. An unexpected wave can knock you down while you’re coming out of the water or stopping to adjust your flippers, injuring you or pulling you into the sea. Pay attention to the ocean so you are not caught off-guard. It’s more powerful than you are. Trust me on that.

Turning your back on the ocean is risky if you are on a rough beach. These are obvious. (i.e., 15 foot waves!).

things you shouldn't do on Maui: shark

8. Don’t swim in murky waters. After heavy rains, stay out of the ocean until the water clears. Avoid swimming near the mouths of rivers or streams or in any murky or brown water areas. These waters attract predators (pictured), and you don’t want to be mistaken for a fish or turtle when this guy is looking for a snack. Other Maui Beach Tips.

Maui is has the four highest shark attacks after three places in Florida. The murky (salt) water as much as a early mornings in a evenings during dusk. The attacks however are rarely fatal.

9. Don’t leave your windows open while you’re gone. Any windows. Whether it’s your car or accommodations. Maui is blessed with tropical weather that can change from moment to moment. So if you run into the grocery store on a sunny day and leave your car windows down (or even worse, leave the top down on your convertible rental car), you could very well come back 10 minutes later and discover that there was a downpour while you were gone and you can now swim in your back seat.

This isn't bad advice but you really do know if you are just leaving the car for five or ten minutes. Generally, everybody drives with their air conditioning on in the day because it is usually about 80 all year around during the day. Convertibles and open windows are rare.

things you shouldn't do on Maui: a loco moco plate

10. Don’t be afraid of “local” food. Yes, we have McDonalds, Burger King, and Starbucks. But why visit Maui and eat the same food you can get at home? There is such a rich variety of food here: tropical fruits and vegetables fresh from the farm; fish caught that morning and on your plate at lunchtime; local fast food eateries, food trucks, mom-and-pop cafes, ethnic foods, and cutting-edge fine dining restaurants with acclaimed chefs. Be adventurous and try some local foods you’ve never tasted before! For dining suggestions, see my Top 20 Favorite Restaurants.

eat where you see middle class locals eating... Never a bad idea.

11. Don’t scuba dive in the morning then head to the top of Mount Haleakala that afternoon. If you are a diver, wait 24 hours after scuba diving before driving up to Haleakala or doing any other high-altitude activity like a helicopter tour or mountainside zip line. Decompression sickness (aka “the bends”) is not a memory you want to take home from your Maui trip.

This is true and the warning is given by the National Park for Haleakala. What isn't given is that you should realize that the drive up and down that mountain has lots of places where you can drive off the road to your death. Drive slow and pull to the designated side areas to let local traffic pass you. The road up and down is more crowded than you might expect because many people work at the observatories and there are lots of visitors year around...and one road.

12. Don’t skimp on the sunscreen, but please use ONLY reef-safe sunscreen. Just keep slathering on the high-SPF sunscreen throughout the day when exploring the island. Due to our proximity to the Equator, Maui’s tropical sun can burn you fast, even more so when you are near the water, and even on a cloudy overcast day. Nothing can ruin a vacation faster than a painful sunburn! However, if you plan on going into the ocean, please be aware that many sunscreens have ingredients that can irreparably harm the coral reefs.

The safe suncreen is remarkably ineffective. You almost cannot find any zinc oxide which doesn't work well anyway. If you bring some old style which works well, you can use it but not on areas exposed to the ocean water.

On January 1, 2021, a new law took effect in Hawaii prohibiting the sale or distribution of sunscreens that contain oxybenzone or octinoxate, two chemicals that have been proven harmful to the marine ecosystems. Hawaii is the first place in the world to ban sunscreens with these chemicals. If you brought sunscreen with you that contains those chemicals, please do not use it here. Instead, choose mineral sunscreens with titanium oxide or zinc oxide, as they are reef-friendly choices.

things you shouldn't do on Maui: monk seal on beach

13. Don’t try to pet a Hawaiian monk seal or ride on the back of a green sea turtle. These are two of the many endangered and threatened species in the Hawaiian islands, and they are protected from harm or harassment by very strict State and Federal laws. So if you are lucky enough to see these wild creatures, enjoy them from a distance, and “look, don’t touch.” This should top everyone’s list of things you shouldn’t do on Maui.

Seeing monk seals is not common at all. But you will see turtles.

And, speaking of wild ocean creatures, DON’T FEED THE FISH. It may sound charming to have a flurry of tropical fish gather ’round for a hand-feeding when you’re snorkeling, but remember this is not an animated Disney movie. There are dangers. First, it’s harmful to the fish and disrupts the natural environmental balance, even affecting the coral reefs, which rely on hungry fish to keep them from being choked by algae. And fish can become aggressive–you can lose a finger (or worse) in the process. Plus, you don’t want to be at the center of a feeding frenzy that draws the attention of the “big boys” (see shark photo above). Please don’t feed the fish.

Don't feed the fish is true. If you have to feed something there are lots of friendly birds that obviously make their living cleaning up after people.

14. Don’t call the continental U.S. “the states.” Hawaii IS one of the states. The 50th state, to be precise. In Hawaii, we refer to the continental U.S. states as “the mainland.” Never “the states.” So statements like “I just arrived from the states” or “They’re having bad weather back in the states” will earn you a look from locals.

This is true:

15. Be cautious about removing any natural items to take as souvenirs. Our island environment, both on land and in the sea, is precious and fragile. Please respect it. It is illegal to take sand (since 2013), dead coral, rocks and other “marine deposits” from the beach. The exceptions are driftwood, shells, beach glass, glass floats (pictured below), and seaweed. It is also illegal to take rocks or minerals from Haleakala National Park; and don’t even think about uprooting an endangered Haleakala Silversword plant to take home — they are protected by Federal law, and theft of a Silversword is a felony crime.

DO relax and enjoy. DON’T stress or rush. And check out my other Practical Do’s and Don’ts for Maui Visitors.

This is true: Book directly with owner/managers whenever you can. If something goes wrong they can help unless a broker was involved.

Looking for great places to stay on Maui? You’ll save by BOOKING DIRECTLY with the owners/managers of these accommodations.
Looking for Maui deals? Sign up here for our free monthly Maui Deals & Steals enewsletter with the latest book-direct deals from our advertisers.

Happy Travels!
|Locations=https://www.mauiaccommodations.com/blog/15-things-not-maui/
|Slot=2022-09-28/12:00 - 12:15 AM
|Markup=things you shouldn't do on Maui: coconuts overhead in a tree
|uuid=ed94858b-e529-4555-b6c0-a605d9ffd8c7
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Justin
|Juror amount=3
|Random juror=done
|Jurors=User:Frank,User:Merel3, User:Bas
}}

Participant/1664381270

2022-09-28T16:07:50Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 4
|Workflow=Workflow/180
|Case ID=AffDjaEdgDaf6djAedGd
}}

Verdict:AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c/3

2022-09-21T16:14:11Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/178
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
|User=User:Bas
|Name=Juror 2
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=There is overwhelming evidence that no such order exists.
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=It's a fabrication.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=Trump is trying to deflect
|Deceit=Trump wants us to believe that since the documents were supposedly declassified by him. no crime was committed.
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=The facts is. whether the documents were classified or not doesn't matter. Having them in the first place is the issue. He's trying to make us forget the obvious fact that he did indeed have them in his possession.
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=100
|Deceit intended text=Trump is up to his usual tactics--obfuscate. delay. confuse the issue.
|Motivation=To avoid the legal issues and to curry favor with and incite his base
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=Trump has been able to effectively use the issue to inflame. There have been many. many threats against FBI agents and offices.
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=The is no excuse for Trump having all these documents--classified or unclassified. blatant nonsense like this needs to be called out.
|Label=This is a factual lie.
|Label percentage=100
|Label text=There is substantial evidence that no such "standing order" ever existed.
}}

Verdict:AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c/3

2022-09-21T16:13:40Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
|Workflow=Workflow/178
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Participant=Participant/1663776668
}}

Workflow/178

2022-09-21T16:11:11Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
|Lie=Trump Declassified Everything
|Topic=Factual Lie
|Accusation=The Justice Department said in a court filing this week that the search of Mar-a-Lago resulted in the seizure of more than 100 unique documents with classification markings. But in posts on his social media platform, Trump has argued that he had declassified all of the documents in his possession.

"Number one, it was all declassified," he wrote in a post on August 12. "Lucky I Declassified!" he wrote in a post this Wednesday.

Trump's comments about this supposed declassification have been very vague. But conservative writer John Solomon, one of the people Trump named as a representative in his dealings with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), was more specific in a Fox appearance on August 12. Solomon read a statement, which he said was from Trump's office, claiming that Trump "had a standing order...that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."
This is patently false. Trump and his team have not provided any proof that Trump actually conducted some sort of broad declassification of the documents that ended up at Mar-a-Lago. What's more, eighteen former top Trump administration officials, including two former White House chiefs of staff who spoke on the record, told CNN in August that they never heard of a standing Trump declassification order when they were serving in the administration and that they now believe the claim is false. The former officials used words like "ludicrous," "ridiculous" and "bullsh*t."

"Total nonsense," said one person who served as a senior White House official. "If that's true, where is the order with his signature on it? If that were the case, there would have been tremendous pushback from the Intel Community and DoD, which would almost certainly have become known to Intel and Armed Services Committees on the Hill."
|Locations=https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/01/politics/fact-check-trump-claims-fbi-search/index.html
|Markup=Trump "had a standing order...that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."
|uuid=df7adce4-03a1-4209-a7a2-b3d7d527dd65
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Justin
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Armar, User:Rht5,User:LobsterNinja, User:CKoehler, User:Joseraeiro
|Jurors=User:Bas
}}

Participant/1663776668

2022-09-21T16:11:09Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Workflow=Workflow/178
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
}}

User:Bas

2022-05-18T16:00:58Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{User
|Name=bas couwenberg
|Email=bascouwenberg781@gmail.com
|Volunteer=
|Online since=Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:44:59 +0000
|Nomessages=True
}}

Workflow/151

2022-05-18T09:11:57Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs judge
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa
|Lie=Hypocritical advertising
|Topic=Marketing lie
|Accusation=Coca Cola advertises their plastic bottles as if they are helping the environment. But they are one of the biggest plastic polluters in the entire world.

Besides this they say their bottles are 100% recycled plastic while the caps and the labels aren't.

It is hypocritical to say they are helping the environment when they know the impact of their actions is zero to none.

https://www.breakfreefromplastic.org/globalbrandauditreport2020/
https://www.cocacolanederland.nl/promoties-en-campagnes/campagnes/recycle-me
|Locations=
|Meeting=https://www.cocacolanederland.nl/promoties-en-campagnes/campagnes/recycle-me
|Markup=Coca Cola environment advertising is hypocritical
|uuid=2e70ad0f-fda0-4240-b3e8-318e22283024
}}

Verdict:AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa/2

2022-05-18T09:11:56Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Plaintiff
|Workflow=Workflow/151
|Case ID=AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa
|User=User:Bas
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=60
|Truth text=The advertising they are performing is sort of the truth
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=They don't mention that it has almost zero impact and that they are still the biggest plastic polluters
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Deceit=They are helping the environment and their actions are working
|Deceit percentage=80
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=100
|Deceit intended text=They now all the statistics but don't do enough against it or just keep advertising
|Motivation=They want to make themselves look good.
|Motivation percentage=
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=20
|Social acceptability text=The question that is good to discuss. Is the plastic waste the cause of the consumer trowing it away or the company selling the products to these customers that can pollute the world.

|Label=Hypocritical advertising
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa/2

2022-05-18T09:08:29Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa
|Workflow=Workflow/151
}}

Participant/287

2022-05-18T09:08:28Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa
|Workflow=Workflow/151
}}

Workflow/151

2022-05-18T09:08:20Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Waiting for Plaintiff verdict
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AfeBhfDfbAafEbh6dfBa
|Lie=Hypocritical advertising
|Topic=Marketing lie
|Accusation=Coca Cola advertises their plastic bottles as if they are helping the environment. But they are one of the biggest plastic polluters in the entire world.

Besides this they say their bottles are 100% recycled plastic while the caps and the labels aren't.

It is hypocritical to say they are helping the environment when they know the impact of their actions is zero to none.

https://www.breakfreefromplastic.org/globalbrandauditreport2020/
https://www.cocacolanederland.nl/promoties-en-campagnes/campagnes/recycle-me
|Locations=
|Meeting=https://www.cocacolanederland.nl/promoties-en-campagnes/campagnes/recycle-me
|Markup=Coca Cola environment advertising is hypocritical
|uuid=2e70ad0f-fda0-4240-b3e8-318e22283024
}}

File:1652864622344Screenshot 2022-05-18 at 11.07.36.png

2022-05-18T09:08:18Z

Bas:

File:1652864622344Screenshot 2022-05-18 at 11.07.36.png

2022-05-18T09:08:18Z

Bas:

{{File for case|Case file=2e70ad0f-fda0-4240-b3e8-318e22283024|File uploaded by=User:Bas|type=png}}

Verdict:AfeBbg3fh6afEbbGcfHf/3

2022-05-11T16:14:58Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/149
|Case ID=AfeBbg3fh6afEbbGcfHf
|User=User:Bas
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=90
|Truth text=There are several lies here
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=This is so clearly a lie he needs to show evidence if one of the things is actually true.
|Nothing But the truth=yes
|Nothing But the truth text=Don't know It is pure lies.
|Deceit=Believe the lie
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=99
|Deceit intended text=Trump knows it is a lie. He is lying.
|Motivation=Power for himself. establish he won the election
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=This is a divisive lie which should disqualify him from any position of responsibility.
|Label=None of this is Factually True. It is imagined by a schizoid personality.
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AfeBbg3fh6afEbbGcfHf/3

2022-05-11T16:10:29Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AfeBbg3fh6afEbbGcfHf
|Workflow=Workflow/149
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1652285369
}}

Workflow/149

2022-05-11T16:09:31Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Rht5
|Case ID=AfeBbg3fh6afEbbGcfHf
|Lie=Pelosi stole the 2020 Presidential Election
|Topic=Divisive Lie
|Accusation=https://twitter.com/StandForBetter/status/1518732416315101186?s=20&t=0Gk5OvjsLnEwu1Q_nOX7fw

Numerous DIVISIVE LIES by Trump

- April 25, 2022 -
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the
United States of America

Melania and I would like to congratulate Elon Musk, who purchased Twitter this
morning. Elon understands the MAGA agenda of free speech, and while he will be
a tough competitor to Devin Nunes and our far superior TRUTH Social, we wish him
well. Many people say Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey conspired with the radical left
maniacs to silence me on his platform while allowing Jimmy Kimmel,
Rosie O'Donnell, and other menopausal women who hate our great followers to stay
on Twitter. This sad action encouraged Nancy Pelosi, AOC, and other crazy
Democrats to steal the election. This tragedy is why many people, including
Marjorie Taylor Greene, saw that Mike Pence was weak and sent text messages to
Mark Meadows asking me to declare martial law. Meadows never passed these
messages to me; otherwise, I would have taken Greene and others' advice and
suspended the fraudulent election. Instead, in 2024 we will Save America by
sending Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to the old folks' home where they can play
checkers and board games with AOC, the Unknown Resister clown, and other
radical Democrats who want to destroy our country.
|Locations=https://twitter.com/StandForBetter/status/1518732416315101186?s=20&t=0Gk5OvjsLnEwu1Q_nOX7fw
|Meeting=https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81521873945?pwd=NFR2azNraW4wL1ZyeTB3U05ralFOZz09
|Slot=2022-5-11/12:00 - 12:15 AM
|Markup=This sad action encouraged Nancy Pelosi, AOC, and other crazy
<div>Democrats to steal the election.</div>
|uuid=726b40db-dbc6-42b8-90bb-f80962d37b75
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Frank
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Justin, User:R0m30, User:Sakshale, User:Purpleturtle98,
|Jurors=User:Isophist, User:Bas
}}

Participant/1652285369

2022-05-11T16:09:30Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/149
|Case ID=AfeBbg3fh6afEbbGcfHf
}}

Verdict:AfeAjgEgcEafEajGeg3e/4

2022-04-27T16:30:30Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/144
|Case ID=AfeAjgEgcEafEajGeg3e
|User=User:Bas
|Name=Juror 3
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=60
|Truth text=Because it is so nasty it looks like he made up the idea of conspiracy
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=80
|Nothing But the truth text=Because he says some things that might be true...like "many people say" which is part of the lie context, and even if "conspiracy" is right, it is still a divisive lie.
|Deceit=That Trump is telling the truth and you should hate Jack Dorsey and left leaning people.
|Deceit percentage=80
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=90
|Deceit intended text=He probably believes that he is telling the truth himself. But his view of reallity has been distorted to much.
|Motivation=To divide the country and empower Donald Trump
|Motivation percentage=
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=-
|Label=This is a Divisive Lie
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AfeAjgEgcEafEajGeg3e/4

2022-04-27T16:28:07Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AfeAjgEgcEafEajGeg3e
|Workflow=Workflow/144
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Participant=Participant/1651076783
}}

Workflow/124

2022-03-30T16:05:37Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs judge
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AfdHfd3dfDafDhfDcd6d
|Lie=Washington Post's slogan vs their paywall
|Accusation=The slogan of the Washington post is: Democracy Dies in Darkness.

But they do put their news behind a paywall so it isn't accessible for everyone. Are they hypocritical or is it acceptabel?
|Locations=https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1508348950868217856
|Markup=The Washington Post’s current slogan is “Democracy Dies in Darkness”. Catchy – for sure – but then what’s up with the paywall for news!?
|uuid=75d2bf2d-3016-4d9e-b94f-7c75f1b010e7
|Random judge=User:CKoehler
}}

Workflow/124

2022-03-30T16:03:49Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

Workflow/124

2022-03-30T13:03:22Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

Verdict:AfdHfd3dfDafDhfDcd6d/2

2022-03-30T13:03:20Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Plaintiff
|Workflow=Workflow/124
|Case ID=AfdHfd3dfDafDhfDcd6d
|User=User:Bas
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=10
|Truth text=I think it does clash with each other. If you say democracy dies in darkness why make your news not accessible to everyone.
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=80
|Whole truth text=There are loads of reasons why there is a paywall. What alternative income is possible?
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Deceit=To say that they stand 100% for a open democracy with open news sources. But they do put a paywall infront of their content.
|Deceit percentage=25
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=25
|Motivation=Try and give of the message that they stand for open democracy. With free speech and press freedom.
|Motivation percentage=85
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=75
|Social acceptability text=It isn't a bad lie, I just think it is inconsistent
|Label=Inconsistent Washington Post.
|Label percentage=50
}}

Verdict:AfdHfd3dfDafDhfDcd6d/2

2022-03-30T12:57:36Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=AfdHfd3dfDafDhfDcd6d
|Workflow=Workflow/124
}}

Participant/261

2022-03-30T12:57:35Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=AfdHfd3dfDafDhfDcd6d
|Workflow=Workflow/124
}}

Workflow/124

2022-03-30T12:57:26Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Waiting for Plaintiff verdict
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AfdHfd3dfDafDhfDcd6d
|Lie=Washington Post's slogan vs their paywall
|Accusation=The slogan of the Washington post is: Democracy Dies in Darkness.

But they do put their news behind a paywall so it isn't accessible for everyone. Are they hypocritical or is it acceptabel?

|Locations=https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1508348950868217856
|Markup=The Washington Post’s current slogan is “Democracy Dies in Darkness”. Catchy – for sure – but then what’s up with the paywall for news!?
|uuid=75d2bf2d-3016-4d9e-b94f-7c75f1b010e7
}}

File:1648643465700Screenshot 2022-03-30 at 14.30.43.png

2022-03-30T12:57:25Z

Bas:

{{File for case|Case file=75d2bf2d-3016-4d9e-b94f-7c75f1b010e7|File uploaded by=User:Bas|type=png}}

File:1648643465700Screenshot 2022-03-30 at 14.30.43.png

2022-03-30T12:57:24Z

Bas:

Verdict:AfdGhfHbhBafDgh6hbHb/3

2022-03-21T13:34:08Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/119
|Case ID=AfdGhfHbhBafDgh6hbHb
|User=User:Bas
|Name=Juror 2
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=-
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=20
|Whole truth text=-
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=80
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=That Hunter Biden's Laptop represented a US Security Threat
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Motivation=To convinced the public that very high character and truthful people should go to jail
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=The tweeter should be banned from Twitter for life. He needed to respect how many people would read this lie.
|Label=Just remove this from Twitter and Put "New York Post Lie Was Here"
|Label percentage=100
|Lock=true
}}

Verdict:AfdGhfHbhBafDgh6hbHb/3

2022-03-21T13:32:27Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

Verdict:AfdGhfHbhBafDgh6hbHb/3

2022-03-21T13:29:42Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AfdGhfHbhBafDgh6hbHb
|Workflow=Workflow/119
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Participant=Participant/1647869305
}}

Workflow/119

2022-03-21T13:28:41Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Rht5
|Case ID=AfdGhfHbhBafDgh6hbHb
|Lie=Hunter Bidens Laptop
|Topic=Factual Lie Justifying Arrest
|Accusation=The intelligence 'experts' who falsely discredited Hunter Biden's laptop -- and still won't say sorry.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/giuliani-and-the-new-york-post-are-pushing-russian-disinformation-its-a-big-test-for-the-media/ Mother Jones

Susan Walsh/AP

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter. A newly discovered laptop, the FBI, a trove of emails, October, a presidential election—it sounds familiar. Especially when you add in a Russian disinformation campaign. On Wednesday, the New York Post released what it hailed as a bombshell: an unidentified computer repair store owner in Delaware had come to possess a laptop that contained Hunter Biden emails (and purportedly a sex tape), the hard drive and computer was seized by the FBI, the store owner at some point passed a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani, and one of the emails suggested that Hunter, who served on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma, may have in 2015 introduced a Burisma official to his dad, Vice President Joe Biden. The story depicts this as a big scandal, and Guiliani tweeted, “Much more to come.”

But the key point of the article was predicated on false information that Giuliani
has been spreading for a long time—and that appears to be linked to a Russian disinformation operation that the Post neglected to note in its article. That is, the Post piece, based on an unproven smear, is in sync with Moscow’s ongoing effort to influence the 2020 election to help President Donald Trump retain power. (The FBI and other parts of the US intelligence community have stated that Vladimir Putin is once again attacking the US political system to boost Trump.)
And this story presents a challenge to the American media: how to report on an orchestrated campaign to affect the election that relies on disinformation, salacious and sensational material, and the revival of allegations that have already been debunked.
|Locations=https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1505212737709780992?s=20&t=xCmFwYuhFji88R92XNpm7g
|Markup=The intelligence 'experts' who falsely discredited Hunter Biden's laptop -- and still won't say sorry.
|uuid=c3a14349-896e-4bf3-bbe3-425754aaca4c
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Jsterj
|Juror amount=4
|Random juror=User:Frank, User:Isophist, User:Merel2,User:Isophist
|Jurors=User:Bas
}}

Participant/1647869305

2022-03-21T13:28:34Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Bas
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Workflow=Workflow/119
|Case ID=AfdGhfHbhBafDgh6hbHb
}}

Workflow/106

2022-03-09T14:11:21Z

Bas: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs judge
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=Afd6hbDeb0afDfhBdeBj
|Lie=Elon Musk actually does pay taxes
|Topic=Factual Lie
|Accusation=Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Person of the Year will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else.

While he is paying around 12 bilion dollar worth of taxes over 2021.

He also said it is the largest tax payment an US individual has ever done.
|Locations=https://twitter.com/SenWarren/status/1470415896053227522?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1470415896053227522%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fbusiness-59732935
|Markup=Let’s change the rigged tax code so The Person of the Year will actually pay taxes and stop freeloading off everyone else.
|uuid=6a28f1ed-ae7f-41af-874c-622a27d4952b
|Random judge=User:Radioastro
}}