cm2.liecourt.com - User contributions [en]

Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/4

2022-11-16T17:19:36Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/187
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|User=User:Armar
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=75
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=80
|Whole truth text=There is an unstated bias that assumes that all life will be similar in development and behavior to ours.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=80
|Nothing But the truth text=The notion of "life" is too narrowly defined. "Life" forms could exist that are utterly beyond our comprehension, and may easily avoid the Great Filter.
|Deceit=That all life follows "natural" laws similar or identical to what we understand.
|Deceit percentage=90
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=no
|Deceit intended percentage=25
|Motivation=
|Motivation percentage=25
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=25
|Social acceptability text=At this point in our development as a species. these faulty assumptions are mostly benign.
|Label=This claim does not take into account unexamined underlying assumptions.
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h/4

2022-11-16T17:14:41Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|Workflow=Workflow/187
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1668618850
}}

Workflow/187

2022-11-16T17:14:12Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
|Lie=Intelligent Life Is Self Destructive
|Topic=Scientific Lie
|Accusation=According to the probabilistic Drake Equation (see below), advanced intelligent life has probably developed many times in the universe. For example, if the odds of an advanced civilization developing on a habitable planet are one in a trillion, then at least 10 billion such civilizations should have occurred.

We are left with a quandary. To restate the Fermi Paradox, where are they? Why have we not encountered them?

Researchers at NASA's JPL have written a paper (in the peer review process) that states that such civilizations have most likely been "filtered" out, the result of five factors: 1) Diseases/pandemics; 2) Wars (probably nuclear); 3) Depletion of resources/self-induced climate change; 4) Natural catastrophe, i.e., astroids or volcanoes; 5) Destruction by rogue Artificial Intelligence.

The researchers call this phenomenon the Great Filter, and claim that the odds of surviving long enough to communicate with others are astonishingly small. What's more, given the vastness of the cosmos, even if a civilization did survive the Great Filter, the likelihood of an encounter between us and them practically nil.

Please refer to the articles and the researchers' paper, below:

1) https://www.huffpost.com/entry/great-filter-theory-intelligent-life-extinction-nasa_n_636fee4ce4b0ca9acf253784

2) https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/news/1350/are-we-alone-in-the-universe-revisiting-the-drake-equation/

3) https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2210/2210.10582.pdf

4) Here is a discussion about the Drake Equation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

5) N =R∗ ×fp ×ne ×fl ×fi ×fc ×L. (1)

• N is the number of currently active, communicative civilizations in our galaxy.
• R∗ is the rate at which stars form in our galaxy.
• fp is the fraction of stars with planets.
• ne is the number of planets that can potentially host life, per star that has planets.
• fl is the fraction of the above that actually do develop life of any kind.
• fi is the fraction of the above that develop intelligent life.
• fc is the fraction of the above that develop the capacity for interstellar communication.
• L is the length of time that such communicative civilizations are active.

Note that “fraction of the above” means that all the previous conditions have been satisfied. For example, when we consider fc we assume that intelligent life has already developed.
|Locations=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/great-filter-theory-intelligent-life-extinction-nasa_n_636fee4ce4b0ca9acf253784
|Markup=<b>All intelligent life has likely destroyed itself before reaching a sophisticated enough point in its evolution to support an encounter with our civilization.</b>
|uuid=5df59af1-834b-4ee3-aa33-b77192896f9f
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Rht5
|Random juror=User:Rvnash, User:Tantalus1, User:Peterjensen,
|Juror amount=5
|Jurors=User:Justin,User:Bas, User:Armar
}}

Participant/1668618850

2022-11-16T17:14:11Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/187
|Case ID=AffHfj3hjHaf6hf0ch0h
}}

Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/4

2022-11-09T17:20:58Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/186
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
|User=User:Armar
|Name=Juror 3
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=70
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=45
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=30
|Deceit=There may not be a deceit. but If there is one. it lies in discouraging a discussion of detrimental factors other than a possible constricted world-view. It also completely ignores the fact that age-related experience may be very useful in dealing with issues.
|Deceit percentage=50
|Deceit text=While our aging leadership does seem somewhat out of touch. younger leaders throughout the world are also experiencing difficulties.
|Deceit intended=no
|Deceit intended percentage=40
|Motivation=Younger politicians may make this claim to gain an electoral advantage. even if it is not 100% true.
|Motivation percentage=75
|Motivation text=This is a sound tactic. since the media are quick to pounce on any evidence of an older politician being out of step or not "getting" some current trend.
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=55
|Social acceptability text=If this claim makes older politicians more aware of age-related issues that could possibly be influencing them. then the claim is acceptable. even though it may not be 100% true.
|Label=This claim may ignore or minimize many other factors.
|Label percentage=70
}}

Verdict:AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe/4

2022-11-09T17:17:31Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
|Workflow=Workflow/186
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Participant=Participant/1668014208
}}

Workflow/186

2022-11-09T17:16:51Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
|Lie=Aging Leaders Hurt America
|Topic=Not a lie!
|Accusation=America’s leadership class is increasingly older, with many politicians seeking election well beyond the time that most retire. But what if the concern over a longtime politician’s age has less to do with fear that the candidate might die or become incapacitated — and more to do with whether trying to snag yet another term at an age when almost everyone else is retired is just plain arrogant and greedy?

Iowa’s Senator Chuck Grassley makes a good test of that question — a test that merits attention from elected officials across this geriatric-run country..

Unlike Senate colleagues such as California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, Grassley has never been trailed by reports that he’s losing his marbles. Unlike a whole slew of other senators — including much younger pols like 50-year-old New Mexico Democrat Ben Ray Luján, who suffered a stroke — he hasn’t missed significant chunks of time due to serious health issues. His ad touts his best-in-the-Senate attendance record.

And yet a poll published this week that has shocked political pros in the state suggests voters have serious qualms about Grassley’s age. The survey, by the veteran Iowa polling firm Selzer & Co., reported that Grassley was running only 3 points ahead of his Democratic challenger, Mike Franken. Iowa’s Republican governor, meanwhile, was leading her race by 17 points, according to the survey, conducted with the Des Moines Register.

Despite months of Grassley-the-pushup-pro messaging, some 60 percent of respondents, including more than a third of Republicans, told pollsters that they thought age was a concern.

The question that ought to occupy the minds of people like the incumbent president of the United States (who turns 80 this fall), his most likely 2024 challenger (now 76), the Democratic triumvirate atop the House of Representatives (82, 83 and 82) and maybe the entire Senate (the oldest in American history) is: What kind of concern? If nobody is challenging the notion that Grassley is physically and mentally up to the job, shouldn’t everything be fine?

Not for everybody.

From NYT:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/14/us/politics/youth-voters-midterms-polling.html

Alexandra Chadwick went to the polls in 2020 with the single goal of ousting Donald J. Trump. A 22-year-old first-time voter, she saw Joseph R. Biden Jr. as more of a safeguard than an inspiring political figure, someone who could stave off threats to abortion access, gun control and climate policy.

Two years later, as the Supreme Court has eroded federal protections on all three, Ms. Chadwick now sees President Biden and other Democratic leaders as lacking both the imagination and willpower to fight back. She points to a generational gap — one she once overlooked but now seems cavernous.

“How are you going to accurately lead your country if your mind is still stuck 50, 60 or 70 years ago?” Ms. Chadwick, a customer service representative in Rialto, Calif., said of the many septuagenarian leaders at the helm of her party. “It’s not the same, and people aren’t the same, and your old ideas aren’t going to work as well anymore.”
|Locations=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/10/21/voters-worried-chuck-grassley-age-00062805
|Markup=<i>The problem of America’s gerontocracy is not one of infirm or senescent leadership, but one of an increasingly impenetrable elite with entrenched habits and jobs that are entitlements, who are surrounded by staff who shield them from the real world.</i>
|uuid=38e7f993-9c00-4825-ae9b-1c91962f59d6
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Rht5
|Random juror=User:Enviro1, User:Doorjammer, User:Unkle Bluto,
|Juror amount=5
|Jurors=User:Bas,User:Justin, User:Armar
}}

Participant/1668014208

2022-11-09T17:16:49Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/186
|Case ID=AffGac9adEaf6ga3iaDe
}}

Workflow/181

2022-10-26T16:19:16Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Bas
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
|Lie=Putin (anexing ukranine territory)
|Accusation=While Putin stated that russia has claimed Ukrainien territory for ever Ukrainian forces have already retaking parts of that claimed territory.

This makes Putins statement factually untrue, because if it would be seen as true claiming land would be as easy as saying: "I once held that territory so that means it will always be mine". That is just not how it works.

And besides this the referenda that have been taken haven't been fair for the ukrainien people.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/05/ukraine-hails-good-news-from-the-front-lines-with-major-gains-in-counteroffensives-.html
|Locations=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russias-putin-signs-law-annexing-four-ukrainian-regions-2022-10-05/
|Markup=There is no contradiction whatsoever. <b>They will be with Russia forever</b> <b>and they will be returned</b>
|uuid=01d89147-8b7f-4a16-8dab-c38ca8f847eb
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Rht5
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Merel3, User:Slightlyarrogant,
|Jurors=User:Frank,User:Justin,User:Isophist, User:Armar
}}

Participant/1666801154

2022-10-26T16:19:14Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 6
|Workflow=Workflow/181
|Case ID=AffDihAadGaf6diHaaDg
}}

Verdict:Aff6ahBhh9af6faHbhHi/5

2022-10-19T16:15:32Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/183
|Case ID=Aff6ahBhh9af6faHbhHi
|User=User:Armar
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=50
|Truth text=Even though the Bill of Rights guarantees that the State shall establish no religion, the US is, de facto, a christian nation.
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=50
|Whole truth text=Most citizens think that the US is a christian nation since most citizens are christian.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=75
|Deceit=
|Deceit percentage=50
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=50
|Deceit intended text=Perhaps an unintended deceit on the part of many. who believe that the US is a christian nation.
|Motivation=For the political candidate making the claim. the motivation is to build solidarity with fervent christians and undermine the views of those who believe the US is not a christian nation.
|Motivation percentage=
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=15
|Label percentage=40
}}

Verdict:Aff6ahBhh9af6faHbhHi/5

2022-10-19T16:12:08Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=Aff6ahBhh9af6faHbhHi
|Workflow=Workflow/183
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1666195898
}}

Workflow/183

2022-10-19T16:11:40Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=Aff6ahBhh9af6faHbhHi
|Lie=The US is a Christian Nation
|Topic=Factual lie that is the truth
|Accusation=Politico reports that Doug Mastriano, the Republican nominee for governor in Pennsylvania, has argued that America is a Christian nation and that the separation of church and state is a “myth.” https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736 The " The Establishment Clause," the first clause in the Bill of Rights, states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”
|Locations=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736
|Markup=<i>Politico reports that Doug Mastriano, the Republican nominee for governor in Pennsylvania, has argued that </i><b>America is a Christian nation and that the separation of church and state is a “myth.” </b>
|uuid=01e2296e-130e-4288-a2a2-6dc84eacded8
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Bas
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Rht5, User:Justin, User:Sk8king201, User:Ovojetestic,
|Jurors=User:Isophist, User:Armar
}}

Participant/1666195898

2022-10-19T16:11:39Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/183
|Case ID=Aff6ahBhh9af6faHbhHi
}}

Verdict:AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c/5

2022-09-21T16:20:22Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/178
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
|User=User:Armar
|Name=Juror 3
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=100
|Truth text=There is overwhelming evidence that no such order exists.
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=100
|Whole truth text=It's a fabrication.
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=100
|Nothing But the truth text=Trump is trying to deflect
|Deceit=Trump wants us to believe that since the documents were supposedly declassified by him. no crime was committed.
|Deceit percentage=100
|Deceit text=The facts is. whether the documents were classified or not doesn't matter. Having them in the first place is the issue. He's trying to make us forget the obvious fact that he did indeed have them in his possession.
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=100
|Deceit intended text=Trump is up to his usual tactics--obfuscate. delay. confuse the issue.
|Motivation=To avoid the legal issues and to curry favor with and incite his base
|Motivation percentage=100
|Motivation text=Trump has been able to effectively use the issue to inflame. There have been many. many threats against FBI agents and offices.
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=100
|Social acceptability text=The is no excuse for Trump having all these documents--classified or unclassified. blatant nonsense like this needs to be called out.
|Label=This is a factual lie.
|Label percentage=100
|Label text=There is substantial evidence that no such "standing order" ever existed.
}}

Verdict:AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c/5

2022-09-21T16:18:19Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
|Workflow=Workflow/178
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Participant=Participant/1663777062
}}

Workflow/178

2022-09-21T16:17:44Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Frank
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
|Lie=Trump Declassified Everything
|Topic=Factual Lie
|Accusation=The Justice Department said in a court filing this week that the search of Mar-a-Lago resulted in the seizure of more than 100 unique documents with classification markings. But in posts on his social media platform, Trump has argued that he had declassified all of the documents in his possession.

"Number one, it was all declassified," he wrote in a post on August 12. "Lucky I Declassified!" he wrote in a post this Wednesday.

Trump's comments about this supposed declassification have been very vague. But conservative writer John Solomon, one of the people Trump named as a representative in his dealings with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), was more specific in a Fox appearance on August 12. Solomon read a statement, which he said was from Trump's office, claiming that Trump "had a standing order...that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."
This is patently false. Trump and his team have not provided any proof that Trump actually conducted some sort of broad declassification of the documents that ended up at Mar-a-Lago. What's more, eighteen former top Trump administration officials, including two former White House chiefs of staff who spoke on the record, told CNN in August that they never heard of a standing Trump declassification order when they were serving in the administration and that they now believe the claim is false. The former officials used words like "ludicrous," "ridiculous" and "bullsh*t."

"Total nonsense," said one person who served as a senior White House official. "If that's true, where is the order with his signature on it? If that were the case, there would have been tremendous pushback from the Intel Community and DoD, which would almost certainly have become known to Intel and Armed Services Committees on the Hill."
|Locations=https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/01/politics/fact-check-trump-claims-fbi-search/index.html
|Markup=<b>Trump "had a standing order...that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."</b>
|uuid=df7adce4-03a1-4209-a7a2-b3d7d527dd65
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Justin
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Rht5,User:Kevinagomez, User:Billybob, User:Spoonfulofdreams
|Jurors=User:Bas, User:Armar
}}

Participant/1663777062

2022-09-21T16:17:43Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 3
|Workflow=Workflow/178
|Case ID=AffBjc3dc3af6bj3cd3c
}}

Verdict:AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc/5

2022-09-07T16:14:23Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/179
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
|User=User:Armar
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=96
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth percentage=75
|Whole truth text=-
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Nothing But the truth percentage=75
|Nothing But the truth text=-
|Deceit=To support a dictatorship that Ronald de Boer has lived in for 10 years and played football for. Maybe he is even getting payed for it.
|Deceit percentage=80
|Deceit text=-
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=40
|Motivation=I find it hard to believe he really loves Qatar so much to protect them so I think it is a combination of neglect of doing proper research and just stupidity
|Motivation percentage=75
|Motivation text=-
|Social acceptability=Unacceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=70
|Label=A unforgivable lie
|Label percentage=75
}}

Verdict:AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc/5

2022-09-07T16:10:46Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
|Workflow=Workflow/179
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Participant=Participant/1662566450
}}

Workflow/179

2022-09-07T16:00:52Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Admin
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
|Lie=Ronald de Boer as aambassader of Qatar lies about working conditions
|Accusation=The bad working conditions and high heat have caused a lot of working migrants to die a by Qatar so called "natural death". UN studies have found that the high temperatures and pour working conditions have a significant impact on the high death rate under migrant workers.

As a tv personal Ronald de Boer supports Qatar and says that the numbers in the news and in particular 6500 workers that died is taken out of context. And supports Qatar in their work around the World Cup preparations.
I believe it is a bad lie to support a dictatorship like Qatar in the harm they do to hard working immigrants.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/23/revealed-migrant-worker-deaths-qatar-fifa-world-cup-2022

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/08/qatar-failure-to-investigate-migrant-worker-deaths-leaves-families-in-despair/
|Locations=https://m.fcupdate.nl/ampartikel/?id=399916
|Markup=<i>he claimed that the 6,500 dead migrant workers were </i>"<b>taken out of context</b>. 
|uuid=8a6dc272-eecf-41a9-b9e1-8dfb67589682
|Random judge=done
|Judge=User:Frank
|Juror amount=5
|Random juror=User:Rht5, User:Drw1, User:Estragon, User:Slightlyarrogant,
|Jurors=User:Justin, User:Armar
}}

Participant/1662566450

2022-09-07T16:00:51Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Workflow=Workflow/179
|Case ID=AffBefDfe3af6be6dfEc
}}

User:Armar

2022-09-07T16:00:37Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{User
|Name=Armar Archbold
|Email=armararchbold@mac.com
|Online since=Wed, 07 Sep 2022 16:00:37 +0000
}}

Verdict:AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj/4

2022-08-31T16:36:24Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Role=Juror
|Workflow=Workflow/177
|Case ID=AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj
|User=User:Armar
|Name=Juror 2
|Truth=yes
|Truth percentage=60
|Whole truth=yes
|Nothing But the truth=no
|Deceit=
|Deceit percentage=
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=yes
|Deceit intended percentage=40
|Motivation=
|Motivation percentage=
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
|Social acceptability percentage=20
|Label=This is a claim that is believed to be true. but enacting it will nor result in the end of racism and colonialism. It is an incremental step. not a solution.
|Label percentage=100
}}

Verdict:AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj/4

2022-08-31T16:25:23Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=AffAieAdg0af6aiEadGj
|Workflow=Workflow/177
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 2
|Participant=Participant/1661962253
}}

Verdict:ScrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv/1

2022-08-31T16:20:18Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|Case ID=scrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv
|Workflow=Workflow/19
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Participant=Participant/1661962200
}}

Workflow/19

2022-08-31T16:10:03Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=Yes
|Stage=Needs jurors
|Filed by=User:Rhtcmu
|Case ID=scrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv
|Lie=Ballot Stuffing Lie
|Description=

Tweet by The Traveling Kit
@kits_in
#Kraken #KrakenReleased Sidney Powell suggests "Especially egregious conduct" in her filing the "rigged" system produced massive wins for
@realDonaldTrump
in these counties Trump won
Georgia counties:
Forsyth R 65.8%
Paulding R 63.9%
Cherokee R 68.8%
Hall R 70.9%
Barrow R 70.7%
#Kraken #KrakenReleased Sidney Powell suggests "Especially egregious conduct" in her filing the "rigged" system produced massive wins for
@realDonaldTrump
in these counties Trump won
Georgia counties:
Forsyth R 65.8%
Paulding R 63.9%
Cherokee R 68.8%
Hall R 70.9%
Barrow R 70.7%
|Locations=https://twitter.com/kits_in/status/1332015988921954305
|Markup=
<div><br></div><div>The Traveling Kit
</div><div>@kits_in
</div><div><i>#Kraken #KrakenReleased Sidney Powell suggests</i> <b>"Especially egregious conduct" in her filing the "rigged" system produced massive wins for
</b></div><div><b>@realDonaldTrump
</b></div><div><i> in these counties Trump won
</i></div><div><i>Georgia counties:
</i></div><div><i>Forsyth R 65.8%
</i></div><div><i>Paulding R 63.9%
</i></div><div><i>Cherokee R 68.8%
</i></div><div><i>Hall R 70.9%
</i></div><div><i>Barrow R 70.7%</i></div>
|uuid=b0af8bb0-77d5-4287-8059-ab8dc43976de
|Random judge=done
|Juror amount=5
|Judge=User:Rht6
|Suit date=2021-05-17
|Settlement date=2021-05-31
|Random juror=User:Researcher Joe, User:JohnDoe, User:UtterCaOS, User:CurtCole,User:Member5
|Change=yes
|Change seen by=none
|Meeting date=2021-05-17
|Declined juror=User:Scott
|Jurors=User:Armar
}}

Participant/1661962200

2022-08-31T16:10:01Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Juror
|Name=Juror 1
|Workflow=Workflow/19
|Case ID=scrQdsVm-FYRECGZs-tVVKJifv
}}

Verdict:OwVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ/2

2020-05-29T15:51:04Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|mwparselast=true
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Plaintiff
|Workflow=Workflow/10
|Case ID=owVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=90
|Whole truth=no
|Whole truth text=ddd
eee
fff

|Nothing But the truth=yes
|Deceit=
|Deceit percentage=
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=no
|Deceit intended percentage=80
|Motivation=
|Motivation percentage=
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
}}

Workflow/10

2020-05-29T15:39:59Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=Yes
|Stage=Needs judge
|Filed by=User:Armar
|Case ID=owVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ
|Lie=Mail-in voting is corrupt
|Description=Children steal mail-in ballots from mail boxes, as claimed by President Trump.
|Locations=www.twitter.com
|Markup=<b>Children steal mail-in ballots from mail boxes</b>, as claimed by President Trump.
|uuid=8c38c5f6-6601-4292-81c0-3aa63330d9de
|Random judge=User:Ad Strack van Schijndel
}}

Verdict:OwVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ/2

2020-05-29T15:39:58Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|mwparselast=true
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Plaintiff
|Workflow=Workflow/10
|Case ID=owVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ
|Truth=no
|Truth percentage=90
|Whole truth=yes
|Nothing But the truth=yes
|Deceit=
|Deceit percentage=
|Deceit text=
|Deceit intended=yes
|Motivation=
|Motivation percentage=
|Motivation text=
|Social acceptability=Acceptable
}}

Verdict:OwVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ/2

2020-05-29T15:38:55Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Verdict
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=owVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ
|Workflow=Workflow/10
}}

Participant/25

2020-05-29T15:38:54Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Participant
|User=User:Armar
|Role=Plaintiff
|Case ID=owVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ
|Workflow=Workflow/10
}}

Workflow/10

2020-05-29T15:38:49Z

Armar: Edited with WSForm

{{Workflow
|Plaintiff verdict=No
|Stage=Waiting for Plaintiff verdict
|Filed by=User:Armar
|Case ID=owVKganJ-hUExugIp-DcHtrtNZ
|Lie=Mail-in voting is corrupt
|Description=Children steal mail-in ballots from mail boxes, as claimed by President Trump.
|Locations=www.twitter.com
|Markup=<b>Children steal mail-in ballots from mail boxes</b>, as claimed by President Trump.
|uuid=8c38c5f6-6601-4292-81c0-3aa63330d9de
}}

User:Armar

2020-05-29T15:17:11Z

Armar: Created using WSUserPages